Targeted cellular adhesion at biomaterial interfaces

Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 252-259

  Dillow, Angela K ^a   Tirrell, Matthew ^a  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

D aspartic acid; ECM extracellular matrix; F phenylalanine; G glycine; L leucine; N asparagine; PEG polyethylene glycol; PLAL poly(lactic acid co lysine); R arginine; S serine; SFA surface force apparatus

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001125268     PISSN: 13590286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0286(98)80099-5     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Lauffenburger D.A. Making connections count. Nature. 383:1996;390-391.
2. Horwitz A.E. Integrins and health. Sci Am. 1997;68-75.
3. Tirrell M, Hammer D.A. Biological adhesion at interfaces. Annu Rev Mater Sci. 26:1996;651-691.
4. Elbert D.L., Hubbell J.A. Surface treatments of polymers for biocompatibility. Annu Rev Mater Sci. 26:1996;365-394.
5. Cook A.D., Hrkach J.S., Nicholas N.G., Johnson IM, Pajvani U.B., Cannizzaro SM, Langer R. Characterization and development of RGD-peptide-modified poly(lactic acid-co-lysine) as an interactive, resorbable biomaterial. J Biomed Mater Res. 35:1997;513-523 This article focuses on creating a new class of biodegradable scaffold materials that incorporate ligands for specific cellular interactions that will specifically direct cellular responses.
6. Han D.K., Hubbell J.A. Synthesis of polymer network scaffolds from L-lactide and poly(ethylene glycol) and their interaction with cells. Macromolecules. 30:1997;6077-6083 This paper describes a type of tissue-engineered scaffolding and addresses an additional and key factor in creating a material which modulates and directs specific cellular interactions in order to engineer specific tissues, with the combined features that this polymer will resist nonspecific protein adsorption and cellular adhesion.
7. Cima L.G. Polymer substrates for controlled biological interactions. J Cell Biochem. 56:1994;155-161.
8. Saad B, Matter S, Ciardelli G, Uhlschmid G.K., Welti M, Neuenschwander P, Suter U.W. Interactions of osteoblasts and macrophages with biodegradable and highly porous poly-esterurethane foam and its degradation products. J Biomed Mater Res. 32:1996;355-366.
9. Saad B, Hirt T.D., Welti M, Ulhschmid G.K., Neuenschwander P, Suter U.W. Development of degradable polyesterurethanes for medical applications: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res. 36:1997;65-74.
10. Saad B, Keiser OM, Welti M, Ulhschmid G.K., Neuenschwander P, Suter U.W. Multiblock copolyesters as biomaterials: in vitro biocompatibility testing. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 8:1997;497-505.
11. Slepian M.J., Hubbell J.A. Polymeric endoluminal gel paving: hydrogel systems for local barrier creation and site specific drug delivery. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 24:1997;11-30.
12. Lanza R.P., Langer R, Chick W.L. Principles of Tissue Engineering. 1997;Academic Press, San Diego, This recent book is an excellent reference for the wide variety of topics relating to tissue engineering. It includes good sections relevant to novel biomaterials and bioadhesion.
13. Hern D.L., Hubbell J.A. Incorporation of adhesion peptides into nonadhesive hydrogels useful for tissue resurfacing. J Biomed Mater Res. 39:1998;266-276 This paper points out an important consideration in the design of biomaterials that target specific cellular responses. For example, one must consider the biomaterials ability to inhibit nonspecific adsorption and promote specific cellular response, but the surface accessibility and concentration is key to specific recognition. This paper also demonstrates that high densities of control or active peptide sequences can generate nonspecific protein adsorption that ultimately promotes cell spreading even when the cells do not recognize a specific ligand. However, when the peptide is presented in a nonsterically hindered environment, specific cellular recognition is demonstrated by significant cell spreading only of the active peptide, even in the absence of serum proteins.
14. Laemmel E, Penhoat J, Warocquier-Clerout R, Sigot-Luizard M-F. Heparin immobilized on proteins usable for arterial prosthesis coating: growth inhibition of smooth-muscle cell. J Biomed Mater Res. 39:1998;446-452.
15. Amiji MM. Surface modification of chitosan membranes by complexation-interpenetration of anionic polysaccharides for improved blood compatibility in hemodialysis. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 8:1996;281-298.
16. Zhang Y.Y. Self-assembly of hydrophobically modified polyelectrolytes on solid substrates in aqueous environments. [PhD Thesis]. 1997;University of Minnesota, Minnesota.
17. Kohler A.S., Parks P.J., Mooradian D.L., Rao G.H., Furcht L.T. Platelet adhesion to novel phospholipid materials: modified phosphatidylcholine covalently immobilized to silica, polypropylene, and PTFE materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 32:1996;237-242.
18. Iwasaki Y, Mikami A, Kurita K, Yui N, Ishihara K, Nakabayashi N. Reduction of surface-induced platelet activation on phospholipid polymer. J Biomed Mater Res. 36:1997;508-515.
19. Baumgartner J.N., Yang C.Z., Cooper S.L. Physical property analysis and bacterial adhesion on a series of phosphonated polyurethanes. Biomaterials. 18:1997;831-837.
20. Ishihara K, Nomura H, Mihara T, Kurita K, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N. Why do phospholipid polymers reduce protein adsorption? J Biomed Mater Res. 39:1998;323-330.
21. Okumura M, Ohgushi H, Dohi Y, Katuda T, Tamai S, Koerten H.K., Tabata S. Osteoblastic phenotype expression on the surface of hydroxyapatite ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res. 37:1997;22-29.
22. Yamamoto M, Kato K, Ikada Y. Ultrastructure of the interface between cultured osteoblasts and surface-modified polymer substrates. J Biomed Mater Res. 37:1997;29-36.
23. Smetana K, Lukas J, Paleckova V, Bartunkova J, Liu F.T., Vacik J, Gabius H.J. Effect of chemical structure of hydrogels on the adhesion and phenotypic characteristics of human monocytes such as expression of galectins and other carbohydrate-binding sites. Biomaterials. 18:1997;1009-1014.
24. Mathur A.B., Collier T.O., Kao W.J., Wiggins M, Schubert M.A., Hiltner A, Anderson JM. In vivo biocompatibility and stability of modified polyurethanes. J Biomed Mater Res. 36:1997;246-257.
25. Peckham SM, Turitto V.T., Glantz J, Puryear H, Slack SM. Hemocompatibility studies of surface-treated polyurethane- based chronic indwelling catheters. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 8:1997;847-858.
26. Thomas C.H., McFarland C.D., Jenkins M.L., Reaania A, Stelle J.G., Healy K.E. The role of vitronectin in the attachment and spatial distribution of bone-derived cells on materials with patterned surface chemistry. J Biomed Mater Res. 37:1997;81-93 This paper demonstrated the importance of adsorbed ECM proteins on biomaterial surfaces and their effect on subsequent cellular adhesion.
27. Rezania A, Thomas C.H., Branger A.B., Waters CM, Healy K.E. The detachment strength and morphology of bone cells contacting materials modified with a peptide sequence found within bone sialoprotein. J Biomed Mater Res. 37:1997;9-19.
28. Mrksich M, Dike L.E., Tien J, Ingber D.E., Whitesides GM. Using microcontact printing to pattern the attachment of mammalian cells to self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on transparent films of gold and silver. Expt Cell Res. 235:1997;305-313 Whitesides and co-workers developed the microcontact printing technique (μCP) that can produce patterns with dimensions as small as 200 nm in certain cases, but 1 μm conveniently. This technique is much easier, timely and less expensive than photolithography and provides a two-dimensional control of patterns. This method uses a stamp to transfer a patterned layer of alkanethiol to a gold or silver surface. Self-assembled monolayers were formed at this surface only in the regions where the alkanethiol was deposited.
29. Mrksich M, Chen C.S., Xia Y, Dike L.E., Ingber D.E., Whitesides GM. Controlling cell attachment on contoured surfaces with self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on gold. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:1996;10775-10778.
30. Altankov G, Groth T, Krasteva N, Albrecht W, Paul D. Morphological evidence for a different fibronectin receptor organization and function during fibroblast adhesion on hydrophobic glass substrata. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 8:1997;721-740.
31. Gorman S.P., Jones D.S., Mawhinney WM, McGovern J.G., Adair C.G. Conditioning fluid influences on the surface properties of silicone and polyurethane peritoneal catheters: implications for infection. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 8:1997;631-635.
32. Nomura S, Lundber F, Stollenwerk M, Nakamura K, Ljungh A. Adhesion of staphylococci to polymers with and without immobilized heparin in cerebrospinal fluid. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater). 38:1997;35-42.
33. Dickinson R.B., Nagel J.A., Proctor R.A., Cooper S.L. Quantitative comparison of shear-dependent Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to three polyurethane ionomer analogs with distinct surface properties. J Biomed Mater Res. 36:1997;152-162 This paper describes the possible mechanisms involved in cellular attachment and detachment on various biomaterial surfaces. The role that ECM proteins play on initial adhesion events, as well as the rates of detachment is not well understood, but this paper attempts to analyze these phenomena.
34. Marra K.G., Winger TM, Hanson S.R., Chaikof E.L. Cytomimetic biomaterials. 1. In situ polymerization of phospholipids on an alkylated surface. Macromolecules. 30:1997;6483-6488 This paper illustrates the ability to control molecular architecture at the surface of biomaterials through the self-assembly of amphiphiles and consequently polymerizing these amphiphiles to create a bilayer that is stable under a variety of conditions.
35. Mrksich M. Using self-assembled monolayers to understand the biomaterials surfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2:1997;83-88.
36. Losche M. Protein monolayers at interfaces. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2:1997;546-556.
37. Zasadzinski J.A., Viswanathan R, Madsen L, Garnaes J, Schwartz D.K. Langmuir-Blodgett films. Science. 263:1994;1726-1733.
38. Winger TM, Ludovice P.J., Chaikof E.L. Lipopeptide conjugates: biomolecular building blocks for receptor activating membrane-mimetic structures. Biomaterials. 17:1996;437-441.
39. Spevak W, Foxall C, Charych D.H., Dasgupta F, Nagy J.O. Carbohydrates in acidic multivalent assembly: nanomolar P-selectin inhibitors. J Med Chem. 39:1996;1018-1020.
40. Brunk D.K., Hammer D.A. Quantifying rolling adhesion with a cell-free assay: E-selectin and its carbohydrate ligands. Biophys J. 72:1997;2820-2833.
41. Bendas G, Vogel J, Bakowski U, Krause A, Muller J, Rothe U. A liposome-based model system for simulation of lectin-induced cell adhesion. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1325:1997;297-308 This paper illustrates the important information that can be obtained from model biomimetic systems and perturbations to their specific adhesions by steric and electrostatic forces. Through the use of this type of model system, a tremendous amount of practical information can be obtained to aid the development of materials for tissue engineering and drug delivery applications.
42. Dori Y, Tirrell M. Supported bioactive Langmuir-Blodgett bilayers. Symp Surf Biomaterials. 1997;144-147.
43. Berndt P, Fields G.B., Tirrell M. Synthetic lipidation of peptides and amino acids: monolayer structure and properties. J Am Chem Soc. 117:1995;9515-9522.
44. Yu Y-C, Berndt P, Tirrell M, Fields G.B. Self-assembling amphiphiles for construction of protein molecular architecture. J Am Chem Soc. 118:1996;12515-12520 This paper and Yu et al., 1997 [45] describe the ability to use peptide amphiphiles with long-chain dialkyl tails to produce supported bilayers of a controlled surface density. Additionally, these amphiphiles were molecularly constructed to facilitate the appropriate secondary and supersecondary structure of the native peptide.
45. Yu Y-C, Pakalns T, Dori Y, McCarthy J.B., Tirrell M, Fields G.B. Construction of biologically active protein molecular architecture using self-assembly peptide-amphiphiles. Methods Enzymol. 289:1997;571-587.
46. Haverstick K, Pakalns T, Yu Y-C, McCarthy J.B., Fields G.B., Tirrell M. Targeted cell interactions with surfaces incoporating synthetic peptide amphiphile. PMSE. 77:1997;584-585.
47. Chen C.S., Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber D.E. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science. 276:1997;1425-1428 This paper describes the role that cell spreading, shape and focal contact area play in cellular vitality and programmed cell death. Important implications concerning cellular biomechanics, coupled with specific material interactions, are presented in this article.
48. Peppas N.A., Sahlin J.J. Hydrogels as mucoadhesive and bio-adhesive materials: a review. Biomaterials. 17:1997;1553-1561.
49. Dammer U, Popescu O, Wagner P, Anselmetti D, Guntherodt H.J., Misevic G.N. Binding strength between cell adhesion proteoglycans measured by atomic force microscopy. Science. 267:1995;1173-1175.
50. Nopplsimson D.A., Needham D. Avidin-biotin interactions at vesicle surfaces - adsorption and binding, cross-bridge formation, and lateral interactions. Biophys J. 70:1996;1391-1401.
51. Deruelle M, Leger L, Tirrell M. Adhesion at the solid-elastomer interface: influence of the interfacial chains. Macromolecules. 28:1995;7419-7428.
52. Johnson K.L., Kendall K, Roberts A.D. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc R Soc Lond A. 324:1971;301-313.
53. Wong J.Y., Kuhl T.L., Israelachvilli J.N., Mullah N, Zalipsky S. Direct measurement of a tethered ligand-receptor interaction potential. Science. 275:1997;820-822 This article provides quantitative information describing the important differences in long and short range behavior, as well as the on- and off-rates of the interaction between tethered ligands and model receptors. This type of information is crucial in the effective development of drug delivery systems.
54. Sheth S.R., Leckband D. Measurements of attractive forces between proteins and end-grafted poly(ethylene glycol) chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:1997;8399-8404 This work has important implication in the use of PEG brushes as a universal surface coating for the elimination of protein adhesion because many of the applications may be used in situations where the load exceeds that required for the protein-brush penetration.
55. Dillow A, Tirrell M. A method for the measurement of adhesion between soft biomaterials. Peppas N.A., Mooney D.J., Mikos A.G., Brannon-Peppas L. Proceedings of the Topical Conference on Biomaterials, Carriers for Drug Delivery, and Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. 1997;157-159 AIChE, New York, The authors describe a method that is well suited for measuring the adhesion between peptide segments on biomimetic surfaces with model receptors (or even possibly with entire cells) to provide a method for quantitatively measuring ECM-mediated cellular adhesion.
56. Garcia A.J., Duchenyne P, Boettiger D. Quantification of cell adhesion using a spinning disc device and application to surface-reactive materials. Biomaterials. 18:1997;1091-1098.
57. Charych D, Chenge Q, Reichert A, Kuziemko G, Stroh M, Nagy J, Spevak W, Stevens RC. A 'litmus test' for molecular recognition using artificial membranes. Chem Biol. 3:1996;113-120 This work represents an important cytomimetic development as well as a useful analytical device.
58. Josse F, Mrksich M, Whitesides G. On-line detection of nonspecific protein adsorption at artificial surfaces. Anal Chem. 69:1997;3321-3328.