Temporary silicon-tethered ring-closing metathesis approach to C2-symmetrical 1,4-diols: asymmetric synthesis of D-altritol

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 63, Issue 20, 1998, Pages 6768-6769

  Andrew Evans, P ^a   Srinivasa Murthy, V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001081924     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo9811524     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. 2-symmetrical 1,4-diols, see: (a) Lieser, J. K. Synth. Commun. 1983,13, 765.
2. (b) Seebach, D.; Renaud, P. Helu. Chim. Acta 1985, 68, 2342.
3. Short, R. P.; Kennedy, R. M.; Masamune, S. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 1755.
4. Kirn, M.-J.; Lee, I. S. Synleit 1993, 767.
5. (e) Zwaagstra, M. E.; Meetsma, A.; Feringa, B. L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993,4,2163.
6. (f) Morin, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 5095.
7. (g) Vettel, S.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5849 and pertinent references therein.
8. (a) Burk, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,113, 8518.
9. (b) Burk, M. J.; Feaster, J. E.; Harlow, R. L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2, 569 and pertinent references therein.
10. Chong, J. M.; Clarke, I. S.; Koch, I.; Olbach, P. C.; Taylor, N. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 409 and pertinent references therein.
11. For a review on two-directional synthesis, see: Magnuson, S. R. Tetrahedron 1995, 57, 2167.
12. For recent reviews on temporary silicon-tethered strategies, see: (a) Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M.; Sieburth, S. McN. Synthesis 1997, 813.
13. (b) Gauthier, D. R., Jr.; Zandi, K. S.; Shea, K. J. Tetrahedron 1998,54, 2290.
14. For recent reviews on ring-closing metathesis, see: (a) Grubbs, R. H.; Miller, S. J.; Fu, G. C. Aec. Chem. Res. 1995,28,446.
15. (b) Armstrong, S. K. J. Chem. Soc., Ferkln Trans, l 1998, 371.
16. Grubbs, R. H.; Chang, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4413.
17. For some recent leading references on Ru-catalyzed ring-closing metathesis, see: (a) Fu, G. C.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,114, 5426.
18. (b) Meng, D.; Su, D.-S.; Balog, A.; Bertinato, P.; Sorenson, E. J.; Danishefsky, S. J.; Zheng, Y.-H.; Chou, T.-C.; He, L.; Horwitz, S. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,119,2733.
19. Martin, S. F.; Chen, H.-J.; Courtney, A. K.; Liao, Y.; Patzel, M.; Ramser, M. N.; Wagman, A. A. Tetrahedron 1996,52, 7251.
20. Furstner, A.; Langeman, K. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8746.
21. (e) Huwe, C. M.; Blechert, S. Synthesis 1997, 61.
22. (f) Clark, J. S.; Kettle, J. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 127.
23. (g) Barrett, A. G. M.; Baugh, S. P. D.; Gibson, V. C.; Giles, M. R.; Marshall, E. L.; Procopiou, P. A. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1997,155.
24. (h) Yang, Z.; He, Y.; Vourloumis, D.; Vallberg, H.; Nicolaou, K. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997,36, 166.
25. Kim, S. H.; Figueroa, L; Fuchs, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2601.
26. (j) Harrity, J. P. A.; Visser, M. S.; Gleason, J. D.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,1488.
27. (k) Litinas, K. E.; Salteris, B. E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans, l 1997,2869.
28. Delgado, M.; Martin, J. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,38,6299.
29. Linderman, R. J.; Siedlecki, J.; O"Neill, S. A.; Sun, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,119,6919.
30. (n) Kirkland, T. A.; Grubbs, R. H.J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7310.
31. (o) Crimmins, M. T.; Choy, A. L. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7548.
32. (p) Ovaa, H.; Leeuwenburgh, M. A.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Van der Marel, G. A.; Van Boom, J. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3025.
33. (q) Miller, J. F.; Termin, A.; Koch, K.; Piscopio, A. D. J. Org. Chem. 1998,63,3158.
34. (r) Burke, S. D.; Ng, R. A.; Morrison, J. A.; Albert!, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3160 and pertinent references cited within these articles.
35. 10 equation presented
36. Gao, Y.; Hanson, R. M.; Klunder, J. M.; Ko, S. Y.; Masamune, H.; Sharpless, K B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,109, 5765.
37. Habashita, H.; Kawasaki, T.; Akaji, M.; Tamamura, H.; Kimachi, T.; Fujii, N.; Ibuka, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,38, 8307.
38. The reduced rates of reaction are presumably a function of the increased steric hindrance due to allylic substituent. For related examples of this type of problem in ring-closing metathesis, see: (a) Chang, S.; Grubbs, R. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,38,4757.
39. (b) Meyer, C.; Cossy, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7861.
40. 4 855.3697, found 855.3722.
41. Mikiko, M.; Fumiaki, O.; Mayumi, M.; Yohko, T.; Yutaka, A.; Akihiro, O. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1997, 45, 962.
42. 4 827.3384, found 827.3369.
43. 2-symmetrical 1,4-diol 9 in 65% overall yield. equation presented
44. This proved to be a more challenging example that required 0.5 equiv of the Grubbs' catalyst 3 for complete conversion.
45. Shi, G.; Alfonso, D.; Fatope, M. O.; Zeng, L.; Gu, Z.-m.; Zhao, G.-x.; He, K.; MacDougal, J. M.; McLaughlin, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,117, 10409.
46. (a) Kann, R. M.; Haskins, W. T.; Hudson, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947, 69, 624.
47. (b) Angyal, S. J.; Le Fur, R. Carbohydr. Res. 1980,84, 201.
48. Ko, S. Y.; Lee, A. W. M.; Masamune, S.; Reed, L. A., III; Sharpless, K. B.; Walker, F. J. Tetrahedron 1990,46, 245.
49. 3)].