Does consumption of beer, alcohol, and bitter substances affect bitterness perception?

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 59, Issue 4-5, 1996, Pages 625-631

  Guinard, Jean Xavier ^a,b   Zoumas Morse, Christine ^a   Dietz, Jason ^a   Goldberg, Shelley ^a   Holz, Mylan ^a   Heck, Elizabeth ^a   Amoros, Abel ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Bitter substances; Bitterness of isohumulones; Consumption of beer; Liking; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; FLAVORING AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEER; BEVERAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLAVOR; FLUID INTAKE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; TASTE; TASTE ACUITY;

EID: 0029876419     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02124-8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Society of Brewing Chemists. Methods of analysis, eighth revised edition. St. Paul: American Society of Brewing Chemists, Inc.; 1992.
2. Briggs, D. E.; Hough, J. S.; Stevens, R.; Young, T. W. Malting and brewing science. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1981.
3. Dixon, W. J.; Massey, J. Introduction to statistical analysis: Sensitivity experiments. New York: MacGraw-Hill; 1960.
4. Guinard, J.-X.; Pangborn, R. M.; Shoemaker, C. F. Computerized procedure for time-intensity sensory measurements. J. Food Sci. 50:543-544; 1985.
5. Guinard, J.-X.; Pangborn, R. M.; Lewis, M. J. Effect of repeated ingestion on temporal perception of bitterness in beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 44:28-32; 1986.
6. Guinard, J.-X.; Hong, D. Y.; Zoumas-Morse, C.; Budwig, C.; Russell, G. F. Chemoreception and perception of the bitterness of isohumulones. Physiol. Behav. 56:1257-1263; 1994.
7. Guinard, J.-X.; Hong, D. Y.; Budwig, C. Time-intensity properties of sweet and bitter stimuli: Implications for sweet and bitter taste chemoreception. J. Sens. Stud. 10:45-71; 1995.
8. Mattes, R. D. Gustation as a determinant of ingestion. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 41:672-683; 1985.
9. Mattes, R. D. Influences on acceptance of bitter foods and beverages. Physiol. Behav. 56:1229-1236; 1994.
10. Mattes, R. D.; Mela, D. J. Relationship between and among selected measures of sweet-taste preference and dietary intake. Chem. Senses 11:523-539; 1986.
11. Meilgaard, M., Civille, G. V.; Carr, B. T. Sensory evaluation techniques. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1991.
12. Mela, D. Gustatory perception of isohumulones: Influence of sex and thiourea taster status. Chem. Senses 15:485-490; 1990.
13. Nasrawi, C. W.; Pangborn, R. M. The influence of testants on oral irritation by capsaicin. J. Sens. Stud. 3:287-294; 1989.
14. Nasrawi, C. W.; Pangborn, R. M. Temporal gustatory and salivary responses to capsaicin upon repeated stimulation. Physiol. Behav. 47:611-615; 1990.
15. Nasrawi, C. W.; Pangborn, R. M. Temporal effectiveness of mouth-rinsing on capsaicin mouth-burn. Physiol. Behav. 47:617-623; 1990.
16. Pangborn, R. M.; Pecore, S. D. Taste perception of sodium chloride in relation to dietary intake of salt. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 35:510-520; 1982.
17. Pangborn, R. M.; Bos, K. E. O.; Stern, J. S. Dietary fat intake and taste responses to fat in milk by under-, normal, and overweight women. Appetite 6:25-40; 1985.
18. Parducci, A. Contextual effects: A range-frequency analysis. In: Carterette, C.; Friedman, M. P., eds. Handbook of perception. Vol. II. Psychophysical judgement and measurement. New York: Academic Press; 1974:127-141.
19. Poikolainen, K.; Karkkainen, P. Diary gives more accurate information about alcohol consumption than questionnaire. Drug. Alcohol Depend. 11:209-216; 1983.
20. Rozin, P.; Mark, M.; Schiller, D. The role of desensitization to capsaicin in chili pepper ingestion and preference. Chem. Senses 6:23-31; 1981.
21. SAS users guide: Statistics. Version 6.09 edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1989.
22. Tanimura, S.; Mattes, R. D. Relationships between bitter taste sensitivity and consumption of bitter substances. J. Sens. Stud. 8:31-41; 1993.