Orientational relaxation in Brownian rotors with frustrated interactions on a square lattice

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 1503-1511

  Lee, Sung Jong ^a   Kim, Bongsoo ^b  

^a Suwon University   (South Korea)

^b Changwon National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000488290     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.1503     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. For recent reviews, see (a) articles in the frontiers of material science in Science 267, 1615 (1995)
2. (b) M. D. Ediger, C. A. Angell, and S. R. Nagel, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 13 200 (1996).
3. The mode coupling theory of supercooled liquids is reviewed in (a) B. Kim and G. F. Mazenko, Adv. Chem. Phys. 78, 129 (1990)
4. (b) W. Gd¨otze and L. Sjögren, Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 241 (1992);(c) R. Schilling, in Disordered Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994);(d) Special Issue Devoted to Relaxation Kinetics in Supercooled Liquids-Mode Coupling Theory and Its Experimental Tests, edited by S. Yip, Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. 24 (1995);(e) K. Kawasaki, in Progress in Statistical Physics, Proceedings of the International Conference in Statistical Physics in Memory of Professor Soon-Tahk Choh, edited by W. Sung et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
5. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 126 (1997), Dynamics of Glass Transition and Related Topics, Proceedings of Yukawa International Seminar.
6. Model glassy systems may be categorized into two classes. The first class includes models which have a trivial Hamiltonian. The glassy behavior in this class of models is due to kinetic constraints present in the models. Facilitated kinetic Ising models [G. H. Fredrickson and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1244 (1984)]
7. lattice-gas models with constraint [W. Kob and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. E 48, 4364 (1993)]
8. Phys. Rev. Eand the rotating hard needle model [C. Renner, H. Löwen, and J. L. Barrat, 52, 5091 (1995)] belong to this class.
9. See J. Jäckle, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 126, 53 (1997), for further discussions on the dynamics of this class of model systems. The second class of models are characterized by their nontrivial random or/and frustrated Hamiltonians, which give rise to glassy behavior. Potts glass, p-spin-interaction spin glass
10. [J. P. Bouchaud, L. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and M. Mézard, Physica A 222, 243 (1996), and references therein]
11. and the frustrated lattice gas model [M. Nicodemi and A. Coniglio, Phys. Rev. E 57, R39 (1998)], as well as the present model belong to this class. The nature of the possible relationship between these two classes is an important question to be resolved.
12. J. P. Bouchaud and M. Mézard, J. Phys. I 4, 1109 (1994);see also J. P. Bouchaud, L. F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and M. Mézard, in Spin Glasses and Random Fields, edited by A. P. Young (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
13. S. Franz and J. Hertz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2114 (1995).
14. P. Chandra, L. B. Ioffe, and D. Sherrington, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 713 (1995)
15. Phys. Rev. Lett.P. Chandra, M. V. Feigelman, and L. B. Ioffe, 76, 4805 (1996)
16. P. Chandra, M. V. Feigelman, L. B. Ioffe, and D. M. Kagan, Phys. Rev. B 56, 11 553 (1997)
17. Phys. Rev. BP. Chandra, L. B. Ioffe, and D. Sherrington, 58, R14 669 (1998).
18. B. Kim and S. J. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3709 (1997).
19. P. K. Dixon, L. Wu, S. R. Nagel, B. D. Williams, and J. P. Carini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1108 (1990).
20. See also for criticisms and discussions on this, A. Kudlik , Europhys. Lett. 32, 511 (1995)
21. Europhys. Lett.S.R. Nagel , 36, 473 (1996)
22. Europhys. Lett.A. Kudlik , 36, 475 (1996).
23. H. Suga, in Slow Dynamics in Condensed Matter, Proceedings of The First Tohwa International Symposium (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1991).
24. D. L. Leslie-Pelecky and N. O. Birge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1232 (1994)
25. D. L. Leslie-PeleckyN. O. BirgePhys. Rev. B 50, 13 250 (1994).
26. R. Brand, P. Lunkenheimer, and A. Loidl, Phys. Rev. B 56, R5713 (1997).
27. D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 28, 5515 (1983)
28. D. R. Nelson, in Application of Field Theory to Statistical Mechanics, edited by L. Garrido (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984).
29. M. Goldstein, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 3728 (1969).
30. F. Stillinger, Science 267, 1939 (1995).
31. S. Teitel and C. Jayaprakash, Phys. Rev. B 27, 598 (1983).
32. J. Villain, J. Phys. (Paris) 36, 581 (1975)
33. J. V. José, L. P. Kadanoff, S. Kirkpatrick, and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 16, 1217 (1977).
34. J. M. Kosterlitz and D. Thouless, J. Phys. C 6, 1181 (1973)
35. J. Phys. CJ. M. Kosterlitz, 7, 1046 (1974).
36. For a review, see E. Granato, J. M. Kosterlitz, and M. P. Nightingale, Physica B 222, 266 (1996).
37. T. C. Halsey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1018 (1985)
38. T. C. HalseyPhysica B 152, 22 (1988).
39. M. Y. Choi and D. Stroud, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7109 (1987)
40. Phys. Rev. BM. Y. Choi, J. S. Chung, D. Stroud, and J. Choi, 40, 5147 (1989).
41. T. C. Halsey, Phys. Rev. B 31, 5728 (1985).
42. C. Denniston and C. Tang, e-print cond-mat/9710060
43. see also P. Gupta, S. Teitel, and M. J. P. Gingras, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 105 (1997).
44. K. Binder and A. P. Young, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 801 (1986)
45. K. H. Fischer and J. A. Hertz, Spin Glasses (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991)
46. Spin Glasses and Random Fields, edited by A. P. Young (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
47. L. J. Lewis and G. Wahnström, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3865 (1994)
48. G. Wahnström and L. J. Lewis, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 126, 261 (1997).
49. F. Sciortino, P. Gallo, P. Tartaglia, and S.-H. Chen, Phys. Rev. E 54, 6331 (1996).
50. S. Kämmerer, W. Kob, and R. Schilling, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5450 (1997).
51. D. Sidebottom, R. Bergman, L. Börjesson, and L. M. Torell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3587 (1992)
52. Phys. Rev. Lett.D. SidebottomR. BergmanL. BörjessonL. M. Torell71, 2260 (1993).
53. W. Götze and L. Sjögren, Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 241 (1992).
54. N. Menon and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1230 (1995)
55. R. L. Leheny and S. R. Nagel, Europhys. Lett. 39, 447 (1997).
56. P. Lunkenheimer, A. Pimenov, M. Dressel, Yu. G. Goncharov, R. Böhmer, and A. Loidl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 318 (1996).
57. D. Bitko, N. Menon, S. R. Nagel, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aeppli, Europhys. Lett. 33, 489 (1996).
58. B. Kim and G. F. Mazenko, Phys. Rev. A 45, 2393 (1992).
59. H. Miyagawa, Y. Hiwatari, B. Bernu, and J. P. Hansen, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 3879 (1988).
60. G. Wahnström, Phys. Rev. A 44, 3752 (1991).
61. S. Sanyal and A. K. Sood, Europhys. Lett. 34, 361 (1996)
62. S. SanyalA. K. SoodProg. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 126, 163 (1997).
63. S. Sastry, P. G. Debenedetti, and F. H. Stillinger, Nature (London) 393, 554 (1998)
64. Nature (London)see also A. Angell, 393, 521 (1998).
65. F. Fujara, B. Geil, H. Sillescu, and G. Fleischer, Z. Phys. B 88, 195 (1992)
66. M. T. Ciceron and M. D. Ediger, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 7210 (1996), and references therein.
67. D. N. Perera and P. Harrowell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 120 (1998).
68. R. Yamamoto and A. Onuki, Phys. Rev. E 58, 3515 (1998).
69. M. Nicodemi and A. Coniglio, Phys. Rev. E 57, R39 (1998).
70. S. J. Lee and B. Kim, and J.-R. Lee, e-print cond-mat/9810149.
71. R. D. Mountain and D. Thirumalai, Phys. Rev. A 36, 3300 (1987).
72. A. Rahman, Phys. Rev. A136, A405 (1964).
73. T. Odagaki and Y. Hiwatari, Phys. Rev. A 43, 1103 (1991).
74. W. Kob and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. E 51, 4626 (1995).
75. M. M. Hurley and P. Harrowell, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 10 521 (1996).
76. J.-N. Roux, in Slow Dynamics in Condensed Matter, Proceedings of The First Tohwa University International Symposium, edited by K. Kawasaki, T. Kawakatsu, and M. Tokuyama (AIP, New York, 1991)
77. H. Löwen, J.-P. Hansen, and J.-N. Roux, Phys. Rev. A 44, 1169 (1991).
78. T. Gleim, W. Kob, and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4404 (1998).