Project IMPACT: Influencing and Supporting Teacher Change in Predominantly Minority Schools

Mathematics Teachers in Transition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 309-356

  Campbell, Patricia R ^a   White, Dorothy Y ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139631392     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203053713-20     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject-matter knowledge part of the equation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2. Teachers’knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice (pp. 1—48). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Baroody, A. J. (1987). Children’s mathematical thinking: A developmental framework for preschool, primary, and special education teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Beane, D. B. (1985). Mathematics and science: Critical filters for the future of minority students. Washington, DC: The American University, The Mid-Atlantic Center for Race Equity.
4. Brophy, J. J. (1991). Conclusion. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2. Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice (pp. 349-364). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Campbell, P. F. (1996). Empowering children and teachers in the elementary mathematics classrooms of urban schools. Urban Education, 30, 449-475
6. Campbell, P. E, Rowan, T. E., & Cheng, Y. (1995, April). Project IMPACT. Mathematics achievement in predominately minority elementary classrooms attempting reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
7. Carey, D. A., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Franke, M. L. (1995). Equity and mathematics education. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds,),New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 93-125). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499-531.
9. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd. ed., pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
10. Clewell, B. C., Thorpe, M. E., & Anderson, B. T. (1987, May). Intervention programs in math, science, and computer science for minority and female students in grades four through eight. Princeton, NJ: Educational Tfesting Service.
11. Cobb, P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23, 87-103.
12. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms and learning environments for teachers and researchers. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 4, pp. 125-146). Reston, VA: National Council of Tteachers of Mathematics.
13. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1991). A constructivist approach to second grade mathematics. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 157-176). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., Wood, T., Wheatley, G., & Merkel, G. (1988). Creating a problem-solving atmosphere. Arithmetic Teacher, 36(1), 46-47.
15. Even, R., & Lappan, G. (1994). Constructing meaningful understanding of mathematics content. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics 1994 Yearbook (pp. 128—143). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
16. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 403—434.
17. Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan.
18. Fennema, E., & Meyer, M. R. (1989). Gender, equity and mathematics. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Equity in education (pp. 146-157). Bristol, PA: Falmer.
19. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 1-9). Bristol, PA: Falmer.
20. Fullan, M. with Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Greenes, C., Schulman, L., & Spungin, R. (1993). Techniques of problem solving communication deck. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour.
22. Gross, S. (1988). Participation and performance of women and minorities in mathematics. Volume I: Findings by gender and racial /ethnic group (Final Report of the National Science Foundation Grant No. MDR-8470384; available from the Department of Educational Accountability, Montgomery County Public Schools, 850 Hungerford Drive, Rockville, MD 20850)
23. Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290-294.
24. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97). New York: Macmillan.
25. House, P. A. (1980). Making a problem of junior high school mathematics. Arithmetic Tkacher, 28(2), 20-23.
26. Ladson-Billings, G. (1990). Like lightning in a bottle: Attempting to capture the pedagogical excellence of successful teachers of black students. Qualitative Studies in Education, 3,335-344.
27. Ladson-Billings, G. (1992). Culturally relevant teaching: The key to making multicultural education work. In C. A. Grant (Ed.), Research and multicultural education: From the margins to the mainstream (pp. 106-121). Bristol, PA: Falmer.
28. Lampert, M. (1989). Choosing and using mathematical tools in classroom discourse. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 1 (pp. 223-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29. Lappan, G., & Briars, D. (1995). How should mathematics be taught? In I. Carl (Ed.), Seventy-five years of progress: Prospects for school mathematics (pp. 131-156). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
30. Little, J. W. (1990). Tfeachers as colleagues. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now (pp. 165-193). New York: Falmer.
31. Lockheed, M. E., Thorpe, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Casserly, P., & McAloon, A. (1985, May). Sex and ethnic differences in middle school mathematics, science and computer science: What do we know ? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
32. Loucks-Horsley, S., Harding, C. K., Arbuckle, M. A., Murray, L. B., Dubea, C., & Williams, M. K. (1987). Continuing to learn: A guidebook for teacher development. Andover, MA: The Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands and The National Staff Development Council.
33. Malcom, S. M., Aldrich, M., Hall, P. Q., Boulware, P., & Stern, V. (1984, December). Equity and excellence: Compatible goals (AAAS Publication 84—14). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
34. National Council of Ifeachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
35. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
36. National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences
37. Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivism in mathematics education. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 4, pp. 7-18). Reston, VA: National Council of Ifeachers of Mathematics.
38. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39. Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effect of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
40. Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. P. (1991). Teachers’knowledge of students’ mathematics problem-solving knowledge. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2. Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice (pp. 49—86). Greenwich, CT JAI Press.
41. Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 1—40.
42. Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1992). Creating constructivist environments and constructing creative mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 505—528.
43. Putnam, R. T., Lampert, M., & Peterson, P. L. (1990). Alternative perspectives on knowing mathematics in elementary schools. In C. B. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16, pp. 57-150). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
44. Romberg, T. A., & Pitman, A. (1994). A strategy for social change. In N. L. Webb & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Reforming mathematics education in America’s cities: The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project (pp. 48-66). New York: Teachers College Press.
45. Russell, S. J., & Corwin, R. B. (1989). Statistics: The shape of data. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour.
46. Schifter, D., & Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education: Stories of teachers meeting the challenge of reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
47. Shaw, K. L., & Jakubowski, E. H. (1991). Teachers changing in changing times. Focus on learning problems in mathematics, 13(4), 13-20.
48. Silver, E. A., Smith, M. S., & Nelson, B. S. (1995). The QUASAR Project: Equity concerns meet mathematics education reform in the middle school. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 9-56). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114—145.
50. Steffe, L. P., Cobb, P., & von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag.
51. Stein, M. K., Silver, E. A., & Smith, M. S. (in press). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices: A symposium on mathematics and science learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Thompson, A. G. (1985). Teachers’conceptions of mathematics and the teaching of problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 281-294). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. von Glasersfeld, E. (1990). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 4, pp. 19-29). Reston, VA: National Council of Tteachers of Mathematics.
54. Wideen, M. F. (1992). School-based teacher development. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 123-155). Bristol, PA: Falmer.