Negative differential resistance in the scanning-tunneling spectroscopy of organic molecules

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 59, Issue 12, 1999, Pages R7852-R7855

  Henderson, J ^c   Kubiak, C ^c  

^a Purdue University   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000067215     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.R7852     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. S. Datta, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2530 (1997), and references therein.
2. M. A. Reed, et al., Science 278, 252 (1997), and references therein.
3. J. Tersoff and D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B 31, 805 (1985);
4. Phys. Rev. BN. D. Lang, 34, 5947 (1986).
5. N. D. Lang, Phys. Rev. B 55, 9364 (1997).
6. I.-W. Lyo and Ph. Avouris, Science 245, 1369 (1989).
7. Scanning Tunneling Microscopy III, edited by R. Wiesendanger and H.-J. Güntherodt (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993).
8. A. L. Yeyati, A. Martín-Rodero, and F. Flores, Phys. Rev. B 56, 10 369 (1997).
9. Technically, Pt/Ir tips with composition 80:20 were used (Ir atoms have little effect on the tip electronic structure).
10. Seunghun Hong, Ph.D thesis, Department of Physics, Purdue University, 1998.
11. Y. Xia and G. M. Whiteside, Adv. Mater. 7, 471 (1995).
12. J. Cerdá, et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, 15 885 (1997);
13. Phys. Rev. BJ. Cerdá, et al., 56, 15 900 (1997).
14. V. T. Binh and J. Marien, Surf. Sci. 202, L539 (1988);
15. T. N. Todorov and A. P. Sutton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2138 (1993).
16. S. Datta, Electron Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
17. Under zero bias, both (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) are equal to the equilibrium Fermi energy of the STM/molecule system (Formula presented) which can be determined in principle using the relation (Formula presented) (Formula presented) is the number of electrons in the molecule, see Ref. 1). However, the calculated (Formula presented) is extremely sensitive to small changes in N, making it better to use (Formula presented) as a fitting parameter.
18. M. P. López Sancho, J. M. López Sancho, and J. Rubio, J. Phys. C 18, 1803 (1985).
19. M. J. McLennan, Y. Lee, and S. Datta, Phys. Rev. B 43, 13 846 (1991).
20. Our treatment here is equivalent to replacing the molecule by a large “atom” with the same density of states, whose electrostatic potential is (Formula presented) In principle, we could have calculated the detailed electrostatic potential variation (Formula presented) within the molecule self-consistently. However, such a detailed treatment does not seem justified here in view of the empirical nature of the EHT that we are using.
21. M. C. Desjonquères and D. Spanjaard, Concepts in Surface Physics, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996).
22. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996).
23. N. D. Lang, Phys. Rev. B 52, 5335 (1995);
24. N. D. Lang and Ph. Avouris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3515 (1998).