-
2
-
-
0031140867
-
-
S.-H. Lo, D. A. Buchanan, Y. Taur, and W. Wang, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 18, 209 (1997).
-
(1997)
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
, vol.18
, pp. 209
-
-
Lo, S.-H.1
Buchanan, D.A.2
Taur, Y.3
Wang, W.4
-
3
-
-
7544228907
-
-
C. Boulas, J. V. Davidovits, F. Rondelez, and D. Vuillaume, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4797 (1996).
-
(1996)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.76
, pp. 4797
-
-
Boulas, C.1
Davidovits, J.V.2
Rondelez, F.3
Vuillaume, D.4
-
4
-
-
0001345895
-
-
D. Vuillaume, C. Boulas, J. Collet, J. V. Davidovits, and F. Rondelez, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1646 (1996).
-
(1996)
Appl. Phys. Lett.
, vol.69
, pp. 1646
-
-
Vuillaume, D.1
Boulas, C.2
Collet, J.3
Davidovits, J.V.4
Rondelez, F.5
-
7
-
-
33751158455
-
-
A. N. Parrikh, D. L. Allara, I. Ben Azouz, and F. Rondelez, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 7577 (1994).
-
(1994)
J. Phys. Chem.
, vol.98
, pp. 7577
-
-
Parrikh, A.N.1
Allara, D.L.2
Ben Azouz, I.3
Rondelez, F.4
-
14
-
-
0019688978
-
-
C. J. Koeneke, S. M. Sze, R. M. Levin, and E. Kinsbron, Tech. Dig. Int. Electron Devices Meet., 367 (1981);
-
(1981)
Tech. Dig. Int. Electron Devices Meet.
, pp. 367
-
-
Koeneke, C.J.1
Sze, S.M.2
Levin, R.M.3
Kinsbron, E.4
-
16
-
-
0031072047
-
-
S. A. Risthon, K. Ismaim, J. O. Chu, and K. Chan, Microelectron. Eng. 35, 361 (1997).
-
(1997)
Microelectron. Eng.
, vol.35
, pp. 361
-
-
Risthon, S.A.1
Ismaim, K.2
Chu, J.O.3
Chan, K.4
-
17
-
-
21944456906
-
-
See a review in edited by Plenum, New York
-
See a review in Langmuir-Blodgett films, edited by G. G. Roberts (Plenum, New York, 1990), pp. 376-389.
-
(1990)
Langmuir-Blodgett Films
, pp. 376-389
-
-
Roberts, G.G.1
-
18
-
-
21944449581
-
-
2 thickness was measured independently by ellipsometry on a bare wafer submitted to the same cleaning (see Ref. 2)
-
2 thickness was measured independently by ellipsometry on a bare wafer submitted to the same cleaning (see Ref. 2).
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
0003519909
-
-
-1. Upon introduction of disorder, the frequencies increase. See a review in Academic, Boston 237-304 (see Ref. 4)
-
-1. Upon introduction of disorder, the frequencies increase. See a review in A. Ulman, An introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films. From Langmuir-Blodgett to Self-assembly (Academic, Boston, 1991), pp. 6-17, 237-304 (see Ref. 4).
-
(1991)
An Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films. from Langmuir-Blodgett to Self-assembly
, pp. 6-17
-
-
Ulman, A.1
-
20
-
-
33644676365
-
-
R. Maoz, J. Sagiv, D. Degenhardt, H. Möhwald, and P. Quint, Supramol. Sci. 2, 9 (1995), and references therein.
-
(1995)
Supramol. Sci.
, vol.2
, pp. 9
-
-
Maoz, R.1
Sagiv, J.2
Degenhardt, D.3
Möhwald, H.4
Quint, P.5
-
22
-
-
21944436298
-
-
ox=3.5nm) Schottky FET. This device had no gate to source/drain gap: Gaithersberg (unpublished). Our devices were made as part of a program to test the feasibility of the use of SAMs in operating three-terminal devices, and the device geometry was not optimized to suppress this gap. Better intrinsic transconductance and current drain are expected for a no-gap hybrid nano-FET
-
ox=3.5nm) Schottky FET. This device had no gate to source/drain gap: J. R. Tucker and T. C. Shen, 3rd International Workshop on Quantum Functional Devices, Gaithersberg, 1997 (unpublished). Our devices were made as part of a program to test the feasibility of the use of SAMs in operating three-terminal devices, and the device geometry was not optimized to suppress this gap. Better intrinsic transconductance and current drain are expected for a no-gap hybrid nano-FET.
-
(1997)
3rd International Workshop on Quantum Functional Devices
-
-
Tucker, J.R.1
Shen, T.C.2
-
24
-
-
21944431964
-
-
Dielectric constant and thickness of our vinyl and COOH-terminated SAMs have been measured by ellipsometry, X-ray reflectivity and capacitance technique: Ph.D. thesis, University of Lille
-
Dielectric constant and thickness of our vinyl and COOH-terminated SAMs have been measured by ellipsometry, X-ray reflectivity and capacitance technique: J. Collet, Ph.D. thesis, University of Lille, 1997.
-
(1997)
-
-
Collet, J.1
-
25
-
-
21944432230
-
-
Expected theoretical value is 0.2 eV, see Ref. 16, but this value is lowered by the force image potential
-
Expected theoretical value is 0.2 eV, see Ref. 16, but this value is lowered by the force image potential.
-
-
-
|