Image analysis studies of dimensional changes in swellable hydrophilic polymer matrices

Polymers for Advanced Technologies

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 683-689

  Vlachou, Marilena ^a   Naseef, Hani ^a   Efentakis, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Gels; Hydrophilic polymers; Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose; Image analysis system; Swelling

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; DRUG PRODUCTS; GELS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; SOLUBILITY; SWELLING;

HYDRAULIC PRESS; HYDROXYPROPYL METHY1CELLULOSE (HPMC); SODIUM DICLOFENAC;

ORGANIC POLYMERS;

POLYMER;

EID: 9944255580     PISSN: 10427147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pat.531     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Sung KC, Nixon PR, Skoug JW, Ju RT, Gao P, Topp EM, Patel MV. Effect of formulation variables on drug and polymer release from HPMC-based matrix tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 1996; 142:53.
2. Chien TW. Drug Delivery Systems (2nd edn, chapt. 2). Marcel Dekker: New York, 1992.
3. Colombo P. Swelling-controlled release in hydrogel matrices for oral route. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1993; 11: 37.
4. Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Modelling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001; 48:139.
5. Lee PI, Peppas NA. Prediction of polymer dissolution in swellable controlled-release systems. J. Contr. Rel. 1987; 6: 207.
6. Lee PI, Kim C. Probing the mechanisms of drug release from hydrogels. J. Contr. Rel. 1991; 16: 229.
7. Bettini R, Peppas NA, Colombo P. Polymer relaxation in swellable matrices contributes to drug release. Int. I. Symp. Contr. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 1998; 25: 26.
8. Konrad R, Christ A, Zessin G, Cobet U. The use of ultrasound and pnetrometer to characterize the advancement of swelling and eroding fronts in HPMC matrices. Int. J. Pharm. 1998; 163: 123.
9. Rajabi-Siahboomi AR, Bowtell RW, Mansfield P, Henderson A, Davies MC, Melia CD. Structure and behaviour in hydrophilic matrix sustained release dosage forms: 2. NMR-imaging studies of dimensional changes in the gel layer and core of HPMC tablets undergoing hydration. J. Contr. Rel. 1994; 31: 121.
10. Shapiro M, Jarema MA, Gravina S. Magnetic resonance imaging of an oral gastrointestinal-therapeutic-system (GITS) tablet. J. Contr. Rel. 1996; 38: 123.
11. Ferrero C, Munoz-Ruiz A, Jimenez-Castellanos MR. Fronts movement as a useful tool for hydrophilic matrix release mechanism elucidation. Int. J. Pharm. 2000; 202: 21.
12. Moussa JS, Cartilier LH. Characterization of moving fronts in cross-linked amylose matrices by image analysis. J. Contr. Rel. 1996; 42: 47.
13. Gao P, Skoug JW, Nixon PR, JU TR, Stemm NL, Sung KC. Swelling of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose matrix tablets. 2.Mechanistic study of the influence of formulation variables on matrix performance and drug release. J. Pharm. Sci. 1996; 85(7): 732.
14. Lee PI. Dimensional changes during drug release from a glassy hydrogel matrix. Polym. Commun. 1983; 24 (2): 45.
15. Papadimitriou E, Buckton G, Efentakis M. Probing the mechanisms of swelling of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose matrices. Int. J. Pharm. 1993; 98 : 57.
16. Yang L, Fassihi R. Examination of drug solubility, polymer types, hydrodynamics and loading dose on drug release behaviour from a triple-layer asymmetric configuration delivery system. Int. J. Pharm. 1997; 155: 219.
17. Conte U, Maggi L. Modulation of the dissolution profiles from Geomatrix® multi-layer matrix tablets containing drugs of different solubility. Biomaterials 1999; 17(9): 889.
18. Gao P, Meury RH. Swelling of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrix tablets. 1. Characterization of swelling using a novel optical imaging method. J. Pharm. Sci. 1996; 85(7): 725.
19. Levis DH. Controlled drug release from polymeric matrices involving moving boundaries. In Controlled Release of Pesticides and Pharmaceuticals, Lee PI (ed). Plenum Publishing: New York, 1981; 39-48.
20. Bettini R, Catellani PL, Santi P, Massimo G, Peppas NA, Colombo P. Translocation of drug particles in HPMC matrix gel layer: effect of drug solubility and influence on release rate. J. Contr. Rel. 2001; 70: 383.
21. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker EM, Bud P, Peppas NA. Mechanism of solute release from porus hydrophilic polymers. Int. J. Pharm. 1983; 15 25.
22. Solinis MA, De la Cruz Y, Hermandez RM, Gascon AR, Calvo B, Pedraz JL.Release of ketoprofen enantiomers from HPMC KlOOM matrices diffusion studies. Int. J. Pharm. 2002; 239: 61.
23. Efentakis M, Vlachou M, Choulis NH. Effects of excipients on swelling and drug release from compressed matrices. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1997; 23: 107.
24. Khan KA, Rhodes CT. Effect of compaction pressure on the dissolution efficiency of some direct compression systems. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1972; 47:594.
25. Khan KA. The concept of dissolution efficiency. J. Pharm. Pharm. 1975; 27:48.
26. Anderson NH, Bauer M, Bousac N, Khan-Malek R, Munden P, Sandaro M. An evaluation of fit factors and dissolution efficiency for the comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1998; 17: 811.