Managing familial risk in genetic testing

Genetic Testing

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 356-359

  Taub, Sara ^a   Morin, Karine ^a   Spillman, Monique A ^a   Sade, Robert M ^a   Riddick, Frank A ^a  

^a AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFIDENTIALITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FAMILY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC RISK; GENETIC SCREENING; HEALTH; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT; PATIENT INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROBABILITY; RELATIVE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECT;

EID: 9744279034     PISSN: 10906576     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/gte.2004.8.356     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. (2001). AMA Study on Physicians' Use of the World Wide Web, AMA Press, Chicago.
2. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. (2004). Principles of Medical Ethics. In: Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations. AMA Press, Chicago.
3. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HUMAN GENETICS. (1998). Professional disclosure of familial genetic information. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 474-483.
4. ANDREWS, L.B. (1997). The genetic information superhighway: rules of the road for contacting relatives and recontacting former patients. In Human DNA: Law and Policy: International and Comparative Perspectives. B.M. Knoppers and C. Laberge (eds.). Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp. 133-144.
5. ANNAS, G.J., et al. (1995). Drafting the genetic privacy act: science, policy and practical consideration. J. Law Med. Ethics 23, 360-366.
6. COLLINS, F.S. (1999). Shattuck Lecture: Medical and Societal Consequences of the Human Genome Project. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 28-37.
7. COUNCIL ON ETHICAL AND JUDICIAL AFFAIRS. (2004). Opinion 5.05, Confidentiality. In Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations. American Medical Association, Chicago.
8. GELLER, G., et al. (1997). Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer: the process of informed consent. J. Am. Med. Assn. 227, 1467-1474.
9. GOSTIN, L.O., and HODGE, J.G. (1999). Genetic privacy and the law: an end to genetics exceptionalism. Jurimetrics 40, 21-58.
10. HAKIMIAN, R. (2000). Disclosure of Huntington's Disease to family members: the dilemma of known but unknowing parties. Genet. Test. 4, 359-364.
11. HAYES, C.V. (1992). Genetic testing for Huntington's Disease: a family issue. N. Engl. J. Med. 327, 1449-1451.
12. MACKLIN, R. (1992). Privacy control of genetic information. In Gene Mapping: Using Law and Ethics as Guides. G.J. Annas and S. Elias (eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.
13. McKINNON, W.C., et al. Predisposition genetic testing for late-onset disorders in adults: a position paper of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J. Am. Med. Assn. 278, 1217-1220.
14. NATIONAL COALITION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION IN GENETICS. (2001). Core Competencies in Genetics Essential for All Health-Care Professionals. National Coalition for Health Professional Education in Genetics, Lutherville, MD.
15. Pate v. Threkel 661 So.2d 278 (Fla. 1995).
16. PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION FOR THE STUDY OF ETHICAL PROBLEMS IN MEDICINE AND BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH. (1983). Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions: The Ethical, Social, and Legal implications of Genetic Screening, Counseling, and Education Programs. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
17. Safer v. Estate of Pack, 291 N.J. Super. 619, 677 A.2d 1188 (1996).
18. WACHBROIT, R. (1993). Rethinking medical confidentiality: the impact of genetics. Suffolk University Law Review 27, 1391-1410.