Schoolwork task performance of students at risk of delays

Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 191-198

  Fisher, Anne G ^a,b   Duran, Gerri A ^c  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Children; Occupational therapy; Participation; School; Task performance

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; APTITUDE; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; ONSET AGE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 9744276034     PISSN: 11038128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11038120410003664     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. O'Dougherty M, Wright FS. Children born at medical risk: factors affecting vulnerability and resilience. In: Rolf J, Masten AS, Cicchetti D, Nuechterlein KH, Weintraub S, eds. Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 120-40.
2. Entwisle DR, Alexander KL, Steffel-Olson L. Children, schools, and inequality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.
3. Johnson GM. An ecological framework for conceptualizing educational risk. Urban Education 1994; 29: 34-49.
4. Natriello G, McDill EL, Pallas AM. Schooling disadvantaged children: racing against catastrophe. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1990.
5. Schorr LB, Schorr D. Within our reach: breaking the cycle of disadvantage. New York: Anchor Press Double-day, 1988.
6. Werner EE. Risk and resilience in individuals with learning disabilities: lessons learned from the Kauai longitudinal study. Learning Disabil Res Practice 1993; 8: 28-34.
7. Werner EE, Smith RS. Overcoming the odds: high risk children from birth to adulthood Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.
8. Arroyo AA, Rhoad R, Drew P. Meeting diverse student needs in urban schools: research-based recommendations for school personnel. Preventing School Failure 1999; 43: 145-53.
9. Johnson GM. Teachers in the inner city: experience-based ratings of factors that place students at risk. Preventing School Failure 1997; 42: 19-26.
10. McWhirter JJ, McWhirter BT, McWhirter AM, McWhirter EH. At-risk youth: a comprehensive response, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1998.
11. Entwisle DR, Alexander KL. Summer setback: race, poverty, school composition, and mathematics achievement in the first two years of school. Am Sociol Rev 1992; 57: 72-84.
12. Howard S, Dryden J, Johnson B. Childhood resilience: review and critique of literature. Oxford Rev Educ 1999; 25: 307-23.
13. Daniel B, Wassell, S. Assessing and promoting resilience in vulnerable children: school years (vol. 2). London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 2002: 9-16.
14. Spekman NJ, Herman KL, Vogel SA. Risk and resilience in individuals with learning disabilities: a challenge to the field. Learning Disabil Res Practice 1993; 8: 59-65.
15. Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1987; 57: 316-31.
16. Thomsen K. Building resilient students: integrating resiliency into what you already know and do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2002: 1-44.
17. Pianta RC, Egeland B, Sroufe LA. Maternal stress and children's development: prediction of school outcomes and identification of protective factors. In: Rolf J, Masten AS, Cicchetti D, Nuechterlein KH, Weintraub S, eds. Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 215-35.
18. Werner EE. High-risk children in young adulthood: a longitudinal study from birth to 32 years. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1989; 59: 72-81.
19. Hixson J, Tinzmann MB. Who are the "at-risk" students of the 1990's. 1990 [18 pages]. Available at: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/equity.htm.
20. Fisher AG, Bryze K, Hume V. School AMPS: School Version of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Ft Collins, CO: Three Star Press, 2002.
21. Head Start Program Performance Standards. 45 C.F.R. 1304.20(f)(2)(i) p. 55.
22. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments. 34 C.F.R. 303.16. Available at: http://www.ideapractices.org.
23. Heward WL. Exceptional children: an introduction to special education, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Merrill, 2003: 10.
24. American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56: 609-39.
25. Bricker D. Early intervention for at-risk and handicapped infants, toddlers, and preschool children. Palo Alto, CA: VORT, 1989.
26. Cole K, Swisher M, Thompson M, Fewell R. Enhancing sensitivity of assessment instruments for children: graded multi-dimensional scoring. J Assoc Persons with Severe Handicaps 1985; 10: 209-14.
27. Gifford BR. Introduction. In: Gifford BR, O'Connor MC, eds. Changing assessments: alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 1992.
28. Sattler JM. Assessment of children, 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Author, 1988.
29. Gardner H. Assessment in context: the alternative to standardized testing. In: Gifford BR, O'Connor MC, eds. Changing assessments: alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 1992: 93.
30. Merritt BK, Fisher AG. Gender differences in ADL performance. Arch Rehabil Med 2003; 84: 1872-7.
31. Fisher AG. Assessment of motor and process skills: development, standardization, and administration manual. 5th ed (vol. 1). Ft Collins, CO: Three Star Press, 2003.
32. Fisher AG. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills: user manual. 5th ed (vol. 2). Ft Collins, CO: Three Star Press, 2003.
33. Magalhães LC. Assessing motor and process skills during naturalistic classroom observation: pilot study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, 1995.
34. Atchison BT, Fisher AG, Bryze K. Rater reliability and internal scale and person response validity of the School Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Am J Occup Ther 1998; 52: 843-50.
35. Fisher AG, Bryze K, Atchison BT. Naturalistic assessment of functional performance in school settings: reliability and validity of the School AMPS scales. J Outcome Meas 2000; 4: 504-22.
36. World Health Organization international classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: Author, 2001.
37. Rosenthal R. Parametric measures of effect size. In: Cooper H, Hedges L, eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1994.
38. Cohen J. St atistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988: 25-7.