Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems as a Technology of Power: Empowerment or Panoptic Control?

Data Base for Advances in Information Systems

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 23-37

  Sia, Siew Kien ^a   Tang, May ^a   Soh, Christina ^a   Boh, Wai Fong ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

(ERP); Empowerment; Enterprise Resource Planning; Enterprise system; Organizational control; Panopticon

Indexed keywords

EID: 9744239781     PISSN: 00950033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/504350.504356     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barley, S. R. (1986). “Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 78–109.
2. Boudreau M. C., & Robey, D. (1996). “Coping with Contradictions in Business Process Reengineering.” Information Technology and People, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 40–57.
3. Ciborra, C. U., & Lanzara, G. F. (1994). “Formative Contexts and Information Technology: Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation in Organizations,” Accounting, Management and Information Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 61–86.
4. Clement, A. (1994). “Computing at Work: Empowering Action by Low Level Users,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 52–65.
5. Coombs, R., Knights, D., & Willmott, H. C. (1992). “Culture, Control and Competition: Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Information Technology in Organizations.” Organization Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1.
6. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, California: SAGE Publications Ltd.
7. Czarniawska-Joergers, B. (1988). Ideological Control in Non-ideological Organizations, New York: Praeger.
8. Dandeker, C. (1990). Surveillance, Power and Modernity: Bureaucracy and Discipline from 1700 to the Present Day, Great Britain: Polity Press.
9. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1998). “Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 491–512.
10. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). “Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory,” Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 121–147.
11. Dillard, J. F., & Burris, B. H. (1993). “Technocracy and Management Control Systems,” Accounting, Management and Information Technology, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 151–171.
12. Eccles, T. (1993). “The Deceptive Allure of Empowerment,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 13–21.
13. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1985). “Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches,” Management Science, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 134–149.
14. Frans, D. J. (1993). “Computer Diffusion and Worker Empowerment” Computers in Human Services, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 15–34.
15. Ford, J. D. (1979). “Institutional versus questionnaire measures of organizational structure: A reexamination,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 601–610.
16. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Peregrine Books: London.
17. Gill, T. G. (1995). “High-tech Hidebound: Case Studies of IT that Inhibited Organizational Learning,” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, Vol 5, No. 1, pp. 41–60.
18. Goold, M. & Quinn, J. J. (1990). “The Paradox of Strategic Controls,” Strategic Management Journal Vol. 11, pp. 43–57.
19. Gunge, S. P. (2000). “Business Process Reengineering and The New Organization.” In D. Knights &
20. H. Willmott (Eds.), The Reengineering Revolution: Critical Studies of Corporate Change, London: Sage Publications. pp. 114–133.
21. Gutek, B. A. & Winter, S. J. (1992). “Consistency of Job Satisfaction Across Situations or Framing Artifact.” Journal of Vocational Behavior Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 61–78.
22. Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Relationships of Centralization to other structural properties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 69, 32–40.
23. Hammer, M. & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering The Corporation, New York: Harper Collins Books.
24. Henderson, J. C., & Lee, S. (1992). “Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective,” Management Science, Vol. 38, No. 6.
25. Huber, G. P. (1984). “The Nature and Design of PostIndustrial Organizations,” Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 928 -952.
26. Huber, G. P. (1990). “A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence and Decision-Making,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 47- 71.
27. Kirsch, L. J. (1996). “The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process,” Organization Science, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1 -21.
28. Lucas, H. C. Jr., & Olson, M. H. (1994). “The Impact of IT on Organizational Flexibility,” Journal of Organizational Computing, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 155–176.
29. Lyon, D. (1993). “An Electronic Panopticon: A Sociological Critique of Surveillance Theory,” The Sociological Review, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 653 -678
30. Merchant, K. A. (1988). “Progressing Toward A Theory Of Marketing Control: A Comment.” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, pp. 40–44.
31. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Pohl, N. F. (1982). “Using retrospective Pre-Ratings to Counteract Response-Shift Confounding,” Journal of Experimental Education Vol. 50, pp. 211–214.
33. Psoinos, A., & Smithson, S. (1996). “Exploring the Relationship between Empowerment and Information Systems,” Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Information Systems, Lisbon, Portugal.
34. Rappeport, J. (1987). “Terms of Empowerment/Exemplars of Prevention: Toward a Theory of Community Psychology,” American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 121–148
35. Sayer, K. & Harvey, L. (1997). “Empowerment in Business Process Reengineering: An Ethnographic Study of Implementation Discourses,” Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia.
36. Sewell, G. (1998). “The Discipline of Teams: The Control of Team-Based Industrial Work through Electronic and Peer Surveillance.” Administrative Science Quarterly Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 397–428.
37. Sewell, G. & Wilkinson, B. (1992). “‘someone to watch over me: Surveillance, Discipline and The Just in Time Process,” Sociology Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 271–289.
38. Sia, S. K., Neo, B. S., et al. (1999). “Business Process Reengineering as a Technology of Power: Empowerment or Panoptic Control,” Academy of Management Meeting, Chicago.
39. Simons, R. (1991). “Strategic Orientation and Top Management Attention to Control Systems,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 49–62.
40. Spears, R. & Lea, M. (1994). “Panacea or Panoptic? The Hidden Power in Computer-Mediated Communication,” Communication Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 427–459.
41. Sprangers, M. & Hoogstraten, J. (1989). “Pretesting Effects in Retrospective Pretest-Posttest Designs.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 265–272.
42. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). “Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement and Validation,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 1442–1465.
43. Tannenbaum, A. S. (1968). Control in Organizations, New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, New York: Free Press.
46. Willmott, H. (1994). “Business Process Reengineering and Human Resource Management,” Personnel Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 34–46.
47. Wilson, F. (1995). “Managerial Control Strategies with the Networked Organization.” Information Technology and People, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 57–72.
48. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine, New York: Basic Books, Inc.