Comparative study of FAST gradient echo MRI sequences: Phantom study

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1030-1038

  Perrin, Rosalind L ^a   Ivancevic, Marko K ^a   Kozerke, Sebastian ^b   Vallee, Jean Paul ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

b TFE; Contrast media; Perfusion quantification; Sensitivity; Signal calibration; SSFP

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; FOURIER AQUIRED STEADY STATE GRADIENT ECHO SEQUENCE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFORMANCE; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STEADY STATE;

CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 9644281549     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20205     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lee HM, Wang Y. Dynamic k-space filling for bolus chase 3D MR digital subtraction angiography. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:99-104.
2. Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation 1999;99:763-770.
3. Vallee JP, Ivancevic M, Lazeyras F, et al. Use of high flip angle in T1-prepared FAST sequences for myocardial perfusion quantification. Eur Radiol 2003;13:507-514.
4. Chiu CW, So NM, Lam WW, Chan KY, Sanderson JE. Combined first-pass perfusion and viability study at MR imaging in patients with non-ST segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: feasibility study. Radiology 2003;226:717-722.
5. Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P, Mohrs OK, Kreitner KF, Thelen M. Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation-prepared TrueFISP. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:641-652.
6. Kraitchman DL, Chin BB, Heldman AW, Solaiyappan M, Bluemke DA. MRI detection of myocardial perfusion defects due to coronary artery stenosis with MS-325. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:149-158.
7. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2001;218:215-223.
8. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103:2230-2235.
9. Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P, et al. Perfusion MR imaging of the heart with TrueFISP. Rofo 2001;173:205-210. [Ger]
10. Vallee JP, MacFall JR, Lazeyras F, et al. Pitfalls in myocardial perfusion assessment with dynamic MR imaging after administration of a contrast material bolus in dogs. Acad Radiol 1999;6:512-520.
11. Larsson HB, Fritz-Hansen T, Rostrup E, Sondergaard L, Ring P, Henriksen O. Myocardial perfusion modeling using MRI. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:716-726.
12. Judd RM, Reeder SB, Atalar E, McVeigh ER, Zerhouni EA. A magnetization-driven gradient echo pulse sequence for the study of myocardial perfusion. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:276-282.
13. Wilke N, Simm C, Zhang J, et al. Contrast-enhanced first pass myocardial perfusion imaging: correlation between myocardial blood flow in dogs at rest and during hyperemia. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:485-497.
14. Schaefer S, van Tyen R, Saloner D. Evaluation of myocardial perfusion abnormalities with gadolinium-enhanced snapshot MR imaging in humans. Work in progress. Radiology 1992;185:795-801.
15. Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR. First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology 1990;174:757-762.
16. Bennett HF, Li D. MR imaging of renal function. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1997;5:107-126.
17. Ivancevic MK, Zimine I, Lazeyras F, Foxall D, Vallee JP. FAST sequences optimization for contrast media pharmacokinetic quantification in tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:771-778.
18. Dalla-Palma L, Panzetta G, Pozzi-Mucelli RS, Galli G, Cova M, Meduri S. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of chronic medical nephropathies with impaired renal function. Eur Radiol 2000;10:280-286.
19. Quick HH, Ladd ME, Hoevel M, et al. Real-time MRI of joint movement with trueFISP. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:710-715.
20. Yang D, Kodama T, Tamura S, Watanabe K. Evaluation of the inner ear by 3D fast asymmetric spin echo (FASE) MR imaging: phantom and volunteer studies. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:171-182.
21. Li T, Mirowitz SA. Comparative study of fast MR imaging: quantitative analysis on image quality and efficiency among various time frames and contrast behaviors. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:471-478.
22. Larsson HB, Stubgaard M, Sondergaard L, Henriksen O. In vivo quantification of the unidirectional influx constant for Gd-DTPA diffusion across the myocardial capillaries with MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:433-440.
23. Zur Y, Stokar S, Bendel P. An analysis of fast imaging sequences with steady-state transverse magnetization refocusing. Magn Reson Med 1988;6:175-193.
24. Epstein FH, Mugler JP, 3rd, Brookeman JR. Spoiling of transverse magnetization in gradient-echo (GRE) imaging during the approach to steady state. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:237-245.
25. Haacke EM. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York: Wiley; 1999, 914 p.