Preference for insulin delivery systems among current insulin users and nonusers

Clinical Therapeutics

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1498-1505

  Summers, Kent H ^a   Szeinbach, Sheryl L ^b   Lenox, Sheila M ^c  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

insulin injection pen device; insulin nonusers; insulin users; patient preference; syringe; vial

Indexed keywords

INSULIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG PREFERENCE; DRUG UTILIZATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INSULIN INFUSION; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL ASPECT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; SYRINGE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; DRUG PACKAGING; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; INJECTIONS, SUBCUTANEOUS; INSULIN; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SYRINGES;

EID: 9644260875     PISSN: 01492918     EISSN: 1879114X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus N Engl J Med 329 1993 977 986
2. [published correction appears in Lancet. 1999;354:602] UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) Lancet 352 1998 837 853
3. Abraira C., Colwell J.A., and Nuttall F.Q. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on glycemic control and complications in type II diabetes (VA CSDM). Results of the feasibility trial. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in Type II Diabetes Diabetes Care 18 1995 1113 1123
4. Royle P., Waugh N., and McAuley L. Inhaled insulin in diabetes mellitus Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 3 2003 CD003890
5. Ginsberg B.H., Parkes J.L., and Sparacino C. The kinetics of insulin administration by insulin pens Horm Metab Res 26 1994 584 587
6. Gnanalingham M.G., Newland P., and Smith C.P. Accuracy and reproducibility of low dose insulin administration using pen-injectors and syringes Arch Dis Child 79 1998 59 62
7. Lteif A.N., and Schwenk W.E. Accuracy of pen injectors versus insulin syringes in children with type 1 diabetes Diabetes Care 22 1999 137 140
8. Hyer S.L., Froyd H.E., and Kohner E.M. Effect of the NovoPen on glycaemic control and patient independence in diabetics with visual impairment Pract Diabetes 5 1988 197 199
9. Chantelau E., Schiffers T., Schutze J., and Hansen B. Effect of patient-selected intensive insulin therapy on quality of life Patient Educ Couns 30 1997 167 173
10. Dahl-Jorgensen K. Modern insulin therapy in children and adolescents Acta Paediatr Suppl 88 1999 25 30
11. Corsi A., Torre E., and Coronel G. Pre-filled insulin pen in newly insulin-treated diabetic patients over 60 years old Diab Nutr Metab 10 1997 78 81
12. Bohannon N.J., Ohannesian J.P., and Burdan A.L. Patient and physician satisfaction with the Humulin®/Humalog® Pen, a new 3-mL prefilled pen device for insulin therapy Clin Ther 22 2000 1049 1067
13. Murray J.M., and Delahunty C.M. Mapping consumer preference for the sensory and packaging attributes of cheddar cheese Food Qual Pref 11 2000 419 435
14. Engel J.F., Blackwell R.D., and Miniard P.W. Consumer Behavior 8th ed 1995 Dryden Press Fort Worth, Tex
15. Morwitz V.G., and Pluzinski C. Do polls reflect opinions or do opinions reflect polls? The impact of political polling on voters' expectations, preferences, and behavior J Consumer Res 23 1996 53 67
16. Ruland C.M., Kresevic D., and Lorensen M. Including patient preferences in nurses' assessment of older patients J Clin Nurs 6 1997 495 504
17. Gerber R.A., Cappelleri J.C., Kourides I.A., and Gelfand R.A. Treatment satisfaction with inhaled insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes: Randomized controlled trial Diabetes Care 249 2001 1556 1559
18. Cappelleri J.C., Cefalu W.T., and Rosenstock J. Treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes: A comparison between an inhaled insulin regimen and a sub cutaneous insulin regimen Clin Ther 244 2002 552 564
19. Chapman G.B. Expectations and preferences for sequences of health and money Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 67 1996 59 75
20. Brown G.C., Brown M.M., and Sharma S. Quality of life associated with diabetes mellitus in an adult population J Diabetes Complications 14 2000 18 24
21. Linville P.W., and Fischer G.W. Preferences for separating or combining events J Pers Soc Psychol 60 1991 5 23
22. Paddock L.E., Veloski J., and Chatterton M.L. Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with diabetes disease management Diabetes Care 23 2000 951 956
23. Szeinbach S.L., Barnes J.H., Summers K.H., and Lenox S.M. Development of an instrument to assess expectations of and preference for an insulin injection pen compared with the vial and syringe Clin Ther 26 2004 590 597
24. Kravitz R. Patients' expectations for medical care: An expanded formulation based on a review of the literature Med Care Res Rev 53 1996 3 27
25. Oliver R.L., and Winer R.S. A framework for the formation and structure of consumer expectations: Review and propositions J Econ Psych 8 1987 469 499
26. Zemencuk J.K., Feightner J.W., and Hayward R.A. Patients' desires and expectations for medical care in primary care clinics J Gen Intern Med 13 1998 273 276
27. Hubbert A.R., Sehorn A.G., and Brown S.W. Service expectations: The consumer versus the provider Int J Serv Industry Manage 6 1995 6 21
28. Available at: Partnership For Anthrax Vaccine Education US Anthrax Attacks 2001 Accessed July 26, 2004
29. Managing Your Diabetes: Basic Facts About Diabetes 1998 Eli Lilly Indianapolis, Ind
30. Hair J.F. Jr., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., and Black W.C. Multiple regression analysis Multivariate Data Analysis 5th ed 1998 Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ 141 238
31. Armstong J.S., and Overton T.S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys J Market Res 14 1977 396 402
32. Heiberg T., and Kvien T.K. Preferences for improved health examined in 1,024 patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Pain has highest priority Arthritis Rheum 47 2002 391 397
33. Chapman G.B. Preferences for improving and declining sequences of health outcomes J Behav Decis Making 13 2000 203 218
34. van der Waal M.A., Casparie A.F., and Lako C.J. Quality of care: A comparison of preferences between medical specialists and patients with chronic diseases Soc Sci Med 42 1996 643 649