Logical foundations of negotiation: Outcome, concession and adaptation

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 293-298

  Meyer, Thomas ^a   Foo, Norman ^a   Kwok, Rex ^b   Zhang, Dongmo ^c  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; SET THEORY; SOFTWARE AGENTS; THEOREM PROVING;

LOGICAL FOUNDATIONS; LOGICAL FRAMEWORK; NEGOTIATIONS; SOCIOLOGY;

FORMAL LOGIC;

EID: 9444231678     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Alchourrón, C. E.; Gärdenfors, P.; and Makinson, D. 1985. On the logic of theory change: Partial meet functions for contraction and revision. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50:510-530.
2. Booth, R. 2001. A negotiation-style framework for non-prioritised revision. In van Benthem, J., ed., Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference (TARK 2001), 137-150. San Francisco, California: Morgan Kaufmann.
3. Booth, R. 2002. Social contraction and belief negotiation. In Proceedings of KR'02, 375-384.
4. Bui, T. X., and Shakun, M. F. 1996. Negotiation processes, evolutionary systems design, and negotiator. In Shakun, M. F., ed., Negotiation Processes. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 39-53.
5. Gärdenfors, P. 1988. Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
6. Kraus, S.; Sycara, K.; and Evenchik, A. 1998. Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence 104:1-69.
7. Kraus, S. 2001. Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Systems. MIT Press.
8. Lau, R.; Essam, B.; Chan, S.; and Huang, Z. 2003. Belief revision for adaptive negotiation agents. 196-202.
9. Meyer, T.; Foo, N.; Kwok, R.; and Zhang, D. 2004. Logical foundations of negotiation: strategies and preferences. In Proceedings of KR'04.
10. Parsons, S.; Sierra, C.; and Jennings, N. 1998. Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8(3):261-292.
11. Rosenschein, J. S., and Zlotkin, G. 1994. Rules of Encounter. MIT Press.
12. Sandholm, T. 2002. e-mediator: A next generation electronic commerce server. Computational Intelligence 18(4):656-667.
13. Sycara, K. 1990. Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory and Decision 28:203-242.
14. van der Meyden, R. 1994. Mutual belief revision (preliminary report). In Proceedings of KR'94, 595-606.
15. Walton, D., and Krabbe, E. C. W. 1995. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. Albany, State University of New York Press.
16. Wooldridge, M., and Parsons, S. 2000. Languages for negotiation. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2000), 393-400.
17. Zhang, D.; Foo, N.; Meyer, T.; and Kwok, R. 2004. Negotiation as mutual belief revision. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-04).