When prototypicality makes 'maybes' look more certain: Another look at targets' vigilance towards prejudice cues

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 437-457

  Morera, Maria D ^a   Dupont, Emmanuelle ^b,c   Leyens, Jacques Philippe ^b   Désert, Michel ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c FUND FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9344271128     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.207     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baron, R. S., Burgess, M. L., & Kao, C. F. (1991). Detecting and labelling prejudice: Do female perpetrators go undetected? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 115-123.
2. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
3. Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218-228.
4. Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Broadnax, S., & Blaine, B. (1999). Beliefs in U.S. government conspiracies against Blacks among black and white college students: Powerlessness or system blame? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 941-955.
5. Croizet, J. C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588-594.
6. Dion, K. L. (1975). Women's reactions to discrimination from members of the same or opposite sex. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 294-306.
7. Dion, K. L., & Earn, B. M. (1975). The phenomenology of being a target of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 944-950.
8. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio, & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Gomez, J. P., & Trierweiler, S. J. (1999). Exploring cross-group discrimination: Measuring the dimensions of inferiorization. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1900-1926.
10. Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.
11. Inman, M. L. (2001). Do you see what I see?: Similarities and differences in victims' and observers' perceptions of discrimination. Social Cognition, 19, 521-546.
12. Inman, M. L., & Baron, R. S. (1996). Influence of prototypes on perceptions of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 727-739.
13. Inman, M. L., Huerta, J., & Oh, S. (1998). Perceiving discrimination: The role of prototypes and norms violation. Social Cognition, 16, 418-450.
14. Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Reacting to impending discrimination: Compensation for prejudice and attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1357-1367.
15. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgements as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organization justice (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K., (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and Empirical Advances. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 251-330.
17. Me Conahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. F. Dovidio, & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91-125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Moy, J., & Ng, S. H. (1996). Expectation of outgroup behaviour: Can you trust the outgroup? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 333-340.
19. Nickerson, K. J., Helms, J. E., & Terrell, F. (1994). Cultural mistrust, opinions about mental illness, and black students' attitudes toward seeking psychological help from a white counsellor. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 378-385.
20. Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ethnic identity moderates perception of prejudice: Judgements of personal versus group discrimination and subtle versus blatant bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 550-561.
21. Rodin, M. J., Price, J. M., Bryson, J. B., & Sanchez, F. J. (1990). Asymmetry in prejudice attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 481-504.
22. Smith, H. J., & Spears, R. (1996). Ability and outcome evaluation as a function of personal and collective (dis)advantage: A group escape from individual bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 690-704.
23. Smith, H. J., Spears, R., & Oyen, M. (1994). 'People like us': The influence of personal deprivation and group membership salience on justice evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 277-299.
24. Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Doosje, B. (2001). The (il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. T. Jost, & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 332-362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Steele, C., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
26. Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.
27. Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgements. Advances in experimental social psychology, 34, 1-60.
28. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2001). The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (Vol. 2, pp. 49-66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 95-104.
30. Vivian, J. E., & Berkowitz, N. H. (1993). Anticipated outgroup evaluations and intergroup bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 513-524.