Relation between change of hearing and (modified) Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap score

Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 565-570

  Meijer, A G W ^a   Wit, H P ^a   Albers, F W J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Hearing disability; Interval for true change; Self assessment; Test retest

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDER; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODIFIED AMSTERDAM INVENTORY FOR AUDITORY DISABILITY AND HANDICAP SCORE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF EVALUATION; TYMPANOPLASTY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TYMPANOPLASTY;

EID: 9344259169     PISSN: 03077772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00844.x     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. KRAMER S.E., KAPTEYN T.S. & FESTEN J.M. (1995) Factors in subjective hearing disability. Audiology 34, 311-320
2. MEIJER A.G.W., WIT H.P., TENVERGERT E.M. et al. Reliability and validity of the modified Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap. Int. J. Audiol. 42, 220-226
3. DEMOREST M.E. & WALDEN B.E. (1984) Psychometric principles in the selection, interpretation, and evaluation of communication self-assessment inventories. J. Speech. Hear. Disord. 49, 226-240
4. WEINSTEIN B.E., SPITZER J.B. & VENTRY I.M. (1986) Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly. Ear Hear. 7, 295-299
5. DEMOREST M.E. & ERDMAN, S.A. (1988) Retest stability of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Ear Hear. 9, 237-242
6. TULEY M.R., MULRO C.D., AGUILAR C. et al. (1990) A critical reevaluation of the Quantified Denver Scale of Communication function. Ear Hear. 11, 56-61
7. NEWMAN C.W., WEINSTEIN B.E., JACOBSON O.P. et al. (1991) Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults. Ear Hear. 12, 355-357
8. ANDERSSON G., MELIN L., LINDBERG P et al. (1995) Development of a short scale for self-assessment of experiences of hearing loss. Scand. Audiol. 24, 147-154
9. LUTMAN M.E., BROWN E.J. & COLES R.R. (1987) Self-reported disability and handicap in the population in relation to pure-tone threshold, age, sex and types of hearing loss. Br. J. Audiol. 21, 45-58
10. GATEHOUSE S. (1990) Determinants of self-reported disability in older subjects. Ear Hear. 11(Suppl), 57S-65S
11. NEWMAN C.W., WEINSTEIN B.E., JACOBSON O.P. et al. (1990) The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear. 11, 430-433