Reliability and validity of the (modified) Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 220-226

  Meijer, Astrid G W ^a   Wit, Hero P ^a   TenVergert, Els M ^a   Albers, Frans W J ^a   Muller Kobold, Jeroen P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

AIAD; Hearing disability; Hearing quality; Psychometric analysis; Self assessment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS; DISABILITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HEARING DISORDER; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0142058085     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992020309101317     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Andersson G, Melin L, Lindberg P, Scott B (1995). Development of a short scale for self-assessment of experiences of hearing loss. Scand Audiol 24:147-154.
2. Demorest ME, Walden BE (1984). Psychometric principles in the selection, interpretation, and evaluation of communication self-assessment inventories. J Speech Hear Disord 49:226-240.
3. Gatehouse S (1990). Determinants of self-reported disability in older subjects. Ear Hear 11(suppl):57S-65S.
4. Gatehouse S (1991). The contribution of central auditory factors to auditory disability. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 476(suppl):182-188.
5. Gatehouse S (1991). The role of non-auditory factors in measured and self-reported disability. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 476(suppl):249-256.
6. Giolas TG, Owens E, Lamb SH, Schubert ED (1979). Hearing Performance Inventory. J Speech Hear Disord 44:169-195.
7. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH (1990). How to develop and validate a new quality of life instrument. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. New York: Raven Press, pp. 47-57.
8. Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Festen JM, Tobi H (1995). Factors in subjective hearing disability. Audiology 34:311-320.
9. Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Festen JM, Tobi H (1996). The relationship between self-reported hearing disability and measures of auditory disability. Audiology 35:277-287.
10. Lutman ME (1990). Hearing disability in the elderly. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 476(suppl):239-248.
11. Lutman ME, Robinson DW (1992). Quantification of hearing disability for medicolegal purposes based on self-rating. Br J Audiol 26:297-306.
12. Lutman ME, Brown EJ, Coles R (1987). Self-reported disability and handicap in the population in relation to pure-tone threshold, age, sex and types of hearing loss. Br J Audiol 21:45-58.
13. Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GA (1990). The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear 11:430-433.
14. Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GA (1991). Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults. Ear Hear 12:355-357.
15. Nunnally JM, Bernstein IH (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Schow RL, Gatehouse S (1990). Fundamental issues in self-assessment of hearing. Ear Hear 11(suppl):6S-16S.
17. Schow RL, Smedley TC, Longhurst TM (1990). Self-assessment and impairment in adult/elderly hearing screening-recent data and new perspectives. Ear Hear 11(suppl):17S-27S.
18. Stewart MG (2001). Outcomes and patient-based hearing status in conductive hearing loss. Laryngoscope 111:1-21.
19. Weinstein BE, Ventry IM (1983). Audiometric correlates of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. J Speech Hear Disord 48:379-384.