Challenges in constructing a cross-national ethics code for psychologists

European Psychologist

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 275-277

  Fisher, Celia B ^a,b  

^a FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9344243491     PISSN: 10169040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040.9.4.275     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073.
2. Canadian Psychological Association.(2000). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (3rd ed.). Ottawa: Author.
3. Callahan, D. (1982). Should there be an academic code of ethics? Journal of Higher Education, 53, 335-344.
4. Fisher, C.B. (2003a). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Fisher, C.B. (2003b). An ethics code for academics. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9, 171-179.
6. Frankel, M.S. (1996). Developing ethical standards for responsible research: Why? Form? Functions? Process? Outcomes? Journal of Dental Research, 75, 832-835.
7. Pettifor, J.P. (2004). Professional ethics across national boundaries. European Psychologist, 9, 264-272.
8. Seitz, J., & O'Neill, P. (1996) Ethical decision-making and the code of ethics of the Canadian Psychological Association. Canadian Psychology, 37, 23-30.