Drip application of alternative fumigants to methyl bromide for strawberry production

HortScience

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1707-1715

  Ajwa, Husein A ^a   Trout, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); CROPS; FUMIGATION; GROWTH KINETICS; HYDROLYSIS; IRRIGATION; PATHOLOGY; SOIL MECHANICS; WEED CONTROL;

CASH CROPS; DRIP IRRIGATION; FRUIT YIELD; SOIL FUMIGATION;

FRUITS;

BIOMASS; FRUITS; FUMIGATION; GROWTH RATE; SOIL MECHANICS; WEED CONTROL;

FRAGARIA; FRAGARIA ANANASSA; FRAGARIA X ANANASSA;

EID: 9244265586     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.39.7.1707     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ajwa, H.A., T. Trout, J. Mueller, S. Wilhelm, S.D. Nelson, R. Soppe, and D. Shatley. 2002. Application of alternative fumigants through drip irrigation Systems. Phytopathology 92:1349-1355.
2. Ajwa HA, S. Fennimore, Z. Kabir, F. Martin, J. Duniway, G. Browne, T. Trout, R. Goodhue, and L. Guerrero. 2003. Strawberry yield under reduced application rates of chloropicrin and Inline in combination with metam sodium and VIF, p. 2. In: Proceedings Annual International Research Conference on methyl bromide alternatives and emissions reductions. 3-6 Nov. 2003, San Diego, Calif. http://www.mbao.org/.
3. Baines, R.C., R.H. Small, T.A. DeWolfe., J.P. Martin, and L.H. Stolzy. 1957. Control of the citrus nematode and Phytophthora spp. by Vapam HL. Plant Dis. Rpt. 41:405-414.
4. Ben-Yephet, Y. and Z.R. Frank. 1985. Effect of soil structure on penetration by metam-sodium and of temperature on concentrations required to kill soilborne pathogens. Phytopathology 75:403-406
5. California Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Pesticide use report. Calif. EPA, Dept. of Pest. Regulat., Info. Syst. Branch, Sacramento. http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/pur01rep/trends01.pdf.
6. California Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. Recommended permit conditions for using 1,3-dichloropropene pesticides (fumigant). Calif. EPA, Dept. of Pesticide Regulat., Sacramento. http://www.cdpr.ca.gov.
7. California Strawberry Commission. 2003. Strawberries Review. http://www.calstrawberry.com.
8. Cebolla V. 2002. Alternatives to methyl bromide in vegetable and strawberry crops in Spain, p. 61-65. In: Proceedings international conference on alternatives to methyl bromide. Sevilla, Spain.
9. Csinos, A.S., W.C. Johnson, A.W. Johnson, D.R. Sumner, R.M. McPherson, and R.D. Gitaitis. 1997. Alternative fumigants for methyl bromide in tobacco and pepper transplant production. Crop Protection 16:585-594.
10. Di Primo P, G. Abraham, M. Austerweil, B. Steiner, M. Beniches, I. Peretz-Alon, and J. Katan. 2003. Accelerated degradation of metam-sodium and Dazomet in soil: Characterization and consequences for pathogen control. Crop Protection 22:635-646.
11. Duniway J.M. 2002. Status of chemical alternatives to methyl bromide for preplant fumigation of soil. Phytopathology 92:1337-43.
12. Duniway JM., J.J. Hao, D.M. Dopkins, H. Ajwa, and G.T. Browne. 2001. Chemical, cultural, and biological alternatives to methyl bromide for strawberry, p. 41. In: Annual International Research Conference on methyl bromide alternatives and emissions reductions, Calif. http://www.mbao.org/.
13. EXTOXNET-CP. 2001. Pesticide information profile - Chloropicrin. Extension Toxicology Network. Available online at: http:pmep.cce.cornell.edu/ profiles/extonet/carbaryl-dicrotophos/chloropicrin-ext.html.
14. EXTOXNET-MB. 2001. Pesticide information profile - Methyl bromide. Extension Toxicology Network. Available online at: http:pmep.cce.cornell.edu/ profiles/extonet/haloxyfop-methyl-parathion/methyl-bromide-ext.html.
15. Fennimore, S.A., M.J. Haar, and H.A. Ajwa. 2003. Weed control in strawberry provided by shank-and drip-applied methyl bromide alternative fumigants. HortScience 38:55-61.
16. Gan, J., S.R. Yates, D. Wang, and F.F. Ernst. 1998. Effect of application methods on 1,3-dichloropropene volatilization from soil under controlled conditions. J. Environ. Quality. 27:432-438.
17. Gullino, M.L., A. Minuto, G. Gilardi, A. Garibaldi, H. Ajwa, and T. Duafala. 2002. Efficacy of preplant soil fumigation with chloropicrin for tomato production in Italy. Crop Protection 21:741-749.
18. Haar, M.J., S.A. Fennimore, H.A. Ajwa, and C.Q. Winterbottom. 2003. Chloropicrin effect on weed seed viability. Crop Protection 22:109-115.
19. Jaworski, C.A., S.M. McCarter, A.W. Johnson, and R.E. Williamson. 1978. Response of onions grown for transplants to soil fumigation. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 103:385-388.
20. Johnson, A.W. and J. Feldmesser. 1987. Nematicides - A historical review, p. 448-454 In: J.A. Veech and D.W. Dickson (ed.).Vistase on nematology. Soc. Nematol., Hyattsville, Md.
21. Johnson, A.W., S.M. McCarter, C.A. Jaworski, and R.E. Williamson. 1979. Chemical control of nematodes and soilborneplant-pathogenic fungi on cabbage transplants. J. Nem. 11:138-144.
22. Kasperbauer, M.J. 2000. Strawberry yield over red versus black plastic mulch. Crop Sci. 40:171-174.
23. Lakes Environmental Software. 2000. 1,3-dichloropropene fact sheet. Lakes Environmental Software. http://lakes-environmental.com.toxic/1_3- dichloropropene.html.
24. Lembright, H.W. 1990. Soil fumigation: Principles and application technology. J. Nematol. 22(Suppl.):632-644.
25. Locascio, S.J., J.P. Gilreath, D.W. Dickson, T.A. Kucharek, J.P. Jones, and J.W. Noling. 1997. Fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide for polyethylene-mulched tomato. HortScience 32:1208-1211.
26. Martin, F.N. 1992. The genus Pythium, p. 39-49. In: L. Singleton et al. (eds.). Methods for research on soil borne phytopathogenic fungi. Amer. Phytopathol. Soc., St. Paul, Minn.
27. McKenry, M.V. 1999. The replant problem and its management. Catalina Publ., Fresno, Calif.
28. McCarter, S.M., C.A. Jaworski, and A.W. Johnson. 1978. Effect of continuous plant culture and soil fumigation on soilborne plant pathogens and on growth of tomato transplants. Phytopathology 68:1475-1481.
29. McGovern, R.J., C.S. Vavrina, J.W. Noling, L.A. Datnoff, and H.D. Yonce. 1998. Evaluation of application methods of metam sodium for management of fusarium crown and root rot in tomato in southwest Florida. Plant Dis. 82:919-923.
30. McNiesh, N.C. Welch, and R.D. Nelson. 1985. Trickle irrigation requirements for strawberries in coastal California. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110:714-718.
31. Nicot, P.C. and D.I. Rouse. 1987. Precision and bias of three quantitative soil assays for Venicillium dahliae. Phytopathology 77:875-881.
32. Noling, J. W. and J.O. Becker. 1994. The challenge of research and Extension to define and implement alternative to methyl bromide. J. Nematol. 26(Suppl.):573-586.
33. Rabasse JM. 2002. Metam sodium on strawberry: Example of commercial replacement of methyl bromide in Spain and France, p. 27. In: Proceedings Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emission Reductions
34. Roberts, P.A., A.C. Magyarosy, W.C. Matthews, and D.M. May. 1988. Effects of Metam-sodium applied by drip irrigation on root-knot nematodes Pythium ultimum and Fusarium sp. in soil and on carrot and tomato roots. Plant Dis. 72:213-217.
35. Shaw, D.V., W.D. Gubler, K.D. Larson, and J. Hansen. 1996. Genetic variation for field resistance to Verticillium dahliae evaluated using genotypes and segregating progenies of California strawberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121:625-628.
36. Smelt, J.H., M. Leistra, M.C. Sprong and H.M. Nollen. 1974. Soil fumigation with dichloropropene and metham-sodium: Effect of soil cultivations on dose pattern. Pest. Sci. 4:419-428.
37. Trout, T., and H.A. Ajwa. 1999. Strawberries: drip irrigation and the promise of alternative fumigants. Irr. J. 49:6-7.
38. United Nations Environment Programme. 1997. Report of the 9th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete tire Ozone Layer. Montreal, Canada
39. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Protection of stratospheric ozone. Fed. Reg. 58:15,014-15,049.
40. United States Department of Agriculture. 2003. National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://www.usda.gov/nass/pubs/agstats.htm.
41. Verhagen C, G. Lebbink, and J. Bloem. 1996. Enhanced biodegradation of the nemadicides 1,3-dichloropropene and methyl isothiocyanate in a variety of soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 28:1753-1756.
42. Warton B, and J.N. Matthiessen. 2000. Enhanced biodegradation of metam sodium soil fumigant in Australia, p. 377-380. Proceedings of the BCPC Conference-Pests and Diseases 2000. 4C-4.
43. Watson, R.T., D.L. Albritton, S.O. Anderson, and S.E. Bapty. 1992. Methyl bromide: Its atmospheric science, technology, and economics. Montreal Protocol Assessment, United Nations Environ. Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
44. Wilhelm, S., R.C. Storkan, and J.E. Sagen. 1961. Verticillium wilt of strawberry controlled by fumigation of soil with chloropicrin and chloropicrin-methyl bromide mixtures. Phytopathology 51:744-748.
45. Wilhelm, S. and A.O. Paulus. 1980. How soil fumigation benefits the California strawberry industry. Plant Dis. 64:264-270
46. Wilhelm, S. and R.C. Storkan. 1990. Large scale soil fumigation growth response. Phytopathology 49:530-531.
47. Wilhelm, S, and F.V. Westerlund. 1994. Chloropicrin - Soil fumigant. Calif. Strawberry Comm., Watsonville.
48. Wilhelm, S. 1999. The California strawberry industry and soil fumigation. A Review. Calif. Strawberry Comm., Watsonville.