Chloropicrin effect on weed seed viability

Crop Protection

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 109-115

  Haar, M J ^a   Fennimore, S A ^a   Ajwa, H A ^a   Winterbottom, C Q ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Sunrise Growers   (United States)

Author keywords

Erodium cicutarium (L.) L'Her; Fragaria x ananassa Duch.; Malva parviflora L.; Metam sodium; Methyl bromide alternatives; Polygonum aviculare L.; Portulaca oleracea L.; Soil fumigation; Stellaria media (L.) Mill

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CONTROL; FUMIGANT; HERBICIDE; SEED; VIABILITY; WEED CONTROL;

ERODIUM CICUTARIUM; MALVA PARVIFLORA; POLYGONUM AVICULARE; PORTULACA OLERACEA; STELLARIA MEDIA;

EID: 0037290724     PISSN: 02612194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00119-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams, P.B., Johnston, S.A., Krikun, J., Carpenter, H.E., 1983. Application of metham sodium by sprinkler irrigation to control lettuce drop caused by Sclerotinia minor. Plant Dis. 67, 24-26.
2. Agamalian, H.S., Elmore, C.L., Fischer, B.B., 1994. Weeds. In: Flint, M.L. (Ed.), Integrated Pest Management for Strawberries. University of California IPM public, no. 3351, Oakland, CA, pp. 99-113.
3. Ajwa, H.A., Trout, T., 2000. Strawberry growth and yield with three years of drip fumigation. Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, Orlando, FL. Abstract 25.
4. Ajwa, H.A., Trout, T., Mueller, J., Wilhelm, S., Nelson, S.D., Soppe, R., Shatley, D., 2002. Application of alternative fumigants through drip irrigation systems. Phytopathology, in press.
5. Albritton, D.L., Aucamp, P.J., Megie, G., Watson, R.T. (Eds.), 1998. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion. Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project. Report no. 44. World Meteorology Org., Geneva.
6. California department of pesticide regulation [CADPR], 2001. Currently Registered Organophosphate, Carbamate and Prop. 65 Active Ingredients. Available online at http:www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/empm/grants/orgcarb.htm.
7. Carpenter, J., Lynch, L., Trout, T., 2001. Township limits on 1,3-D will impact adjustments to methyl bromide phase-out. Calif. Agric. 55, 12-18.
8. Castro, C.E., Belser, N.O., 1981. Photohydrolysis of methyl bromide and chloropicrin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29, 1005-1008.
9. Chandler, J.M., 1990. Estimated losses of crops to weeds. In: Pimentel, D. (Ed.), CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture., Vol. III. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 95-109.
10. Csinos, A.S., Summer, D.R, Johnson, W.C., Johnson, A.W., McPherson, R.M., Dowler, C.C., 2000. Methyl bromide alternatives in tobacco, tomato and pepper transplant production. Crop Prot. 19, 39-49.
11. Egley, G.H., 1986. Stimulation of weed seed germination in soil. Rev. Weed Sci. 2, 67-89.
12. Gan, J., Yates, S.R., Ernst, F.F., Jury, W.A., 2000. Degradation and volatilization of the fumigant chloropicrin after soil treatment. J. Environ. Qual. 29, 1391-1397.
13. Gerstl, Z., Mingelgrin, U., Yaron, B., 1977. Behavior of vapam and methylisothiocyante in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 545-548.
14. Grabe, D.F. (Ed.), 1970. Tetrazolium Testing Handbook. Contribution No. 29 to the Handbook on Seed Testing. Association of Official Seed Analysts, p. 62.
15. Harris, D.C., 1990. Control of verticillium wilt and other soil-borne diseases of strawberry in Britain by chemical soil disinfestations. J. Hortic. Sci. 65 (4), 401-408.
16. Hartz, T.K., DeVay, J.E., Elmore, C.L., 1993. Solarization is an effective soil disinfestations technique for strawberry production. HortScience 28, 104-106.
17. Himelrick, D.G., Dozier Jr., W.A., 1991. Soil fumigation and soil solarization in strawberry production. Adv. Straw. Prod. 10, 12-28.
18. Littell, R.C., Freund, R.J., Spector, P.C., 1991. SAS® System for Linear Models, 3rd Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, p. 329.
19. Littell, R.C., Milliken, C., Stroup, G.A., Walter, W., Wolfinger, R.D., 1996. SAS® System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, p. 633.
20. Locascio, S.J., Gilreath, J.P., Dickson, D.W., Kucharek, T.A., Jones, J.P., Noling, J.W., 1997. Fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide for polyethylene mulched tomato. HortScience 32 (7), 1208-1211.
21. Munnecke, D.E., Van Grundy, S.D., 1979. Movement of fumigants in soil, dosage responses and differential effects. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 17, 405-429.
22. Munnecke, D.E., Kolbezen, M.J., Bricker, J.L., 1982. Effect of moisture, chloropicrin and methyl bromide singly and in mixture on sclerotia of Sclerotium rolfsii and Verticillium albo-atrum. Phytopathology 72, 1235-1238.
23. Noling, J.W., Becker, J.O., 1994. The challenge of research and extension to define and implement alternatives to methyl bromide. J. Nematol. 26, 573-586.
24. Pieczarka, S.J., Warren, G.F., 1959. Screening procedure for determining activity of chemicals against imbibed dormant seeds. Weeds 7, 133-140.
25. SAS Institute Inc., 1989. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Version 6, 4th Edition, Vol. 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, p. 846.
26. Shaw, D.V., Larson, K.D., 1999. A meta-analysis of strawberry yield response to preplant soil fumigation with combinations of methyl bromide-chloropicrin and four alternative systems. HortScience 34, 839-845.
27. Smelt, J.H., Leistra, M., 1974. Conversion of metham-sodium to methyl isothiocyanate and basic data on the behavior of methyl isothiocyante in soil. Pestic. Sci. 5, 401-407.
28. Smith, R.F., Bendixen, W.E., Fennimore, S.A., 2001. University of California Integrated Pest Management Pest Mangement Guidelines: Strawberry. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Public. no. 3339.
29. Teasdale, J.R., Taylorson, R.B., 1986. Weed seed response to methyl isothiocyanate and metham. Weed Sci. 34, 520-524.
30. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, 2000. Economic implications of the methyl bromide phaseout. Agriculture Information Bull. No. 756.
31. United States Department of Agriculture National Agriculture Statistics Service, 2001. Vegetables 2000 Summary. USDA Agricultural Statistics Board National Agricultural Statistics Service.
32. Wang, D., Yates, S.R., 1998. Methyl bromide emission from fields partially covered with a high-density polyethylene and virtually impermeable film. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 2515-2518.
33. Wang, D., Yates, S.R., Ernst, F.F., Gan, J., Jury, W.A., 1997. Reducing methyl bromide emission with a high barrier plastic film and reduced dosage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 3686-3691.
34. Wilhelm, S., Paulus, A., 1980. How soil fumigation benefits the California Strawberry Industry. Plant Dis. 64, 264-270.
35. Yagi, K., Williams, J., Wang, N.Y., Cicerone, R.J., 1993. Agricultural Soil fumigation as a source of atmospheric methyl bromide. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 8420-8423.
36. Zhang, W.M., McGiffen Jr., M.E., Becker, J.O., Ohr, H.D., Sims, J.J., Kallenbach, R.L., 1997. Dose response of weeds to methyl iodide and methyl bromide. Weed Res. 37, 181-189.
37. Zhang, W., McGiffen Jr., M.E., Becker, J.O., Ohr, H.D., Sims, J.J., Campbell, S.D., 1998. Effect of soil physical factors on methyl iodide and methyl bromide. Pestic. Sci. 53, 71-79.