Fitness traits and larval survival of the lappet moth, Streblote panda (Hübner, 1820) (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae), reared on different host plants

African Entomology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 278-282

  Calvo, D ^a   Molina, J Ma ^a  

^a IFAPA CENTRO EL TORUÑO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LASIOCAMPIDAE; LEPIDOPTERA; PANDA; PHYLLODESMA AMERICANA;

EID: 9244240319     PISSN: 10213589     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ALLEN, S.E. (Ed.) 1989. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. 2nd Edition. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
2. BERNAYS, E.A. 1995. Effects of experience on host-plant selection. In: Cardé, R.T. & Bell, W.J. (Eds) Chemical Ecology of Insects 2. 47-68. Chapman & Hall, New York.
3. BLANEY, W.M. & SIMMONDS, M.S.J. 1992. Variability in insect-plant interactions. In: Menken, S.B.J., Visser, J.H. & Harrewijn, P. (Eds) Proceedings, 8th International Symposium Insect-Plant Relationships. 389-393. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
4. CAMBINI, A. & MAGNOLER, A. 1997. The influence of two evergreen oaks on development characteristics and fecundity of the gypsy moth. Redia 80: 33-43.
5. CAPINERA, J.L. 1978. Studies on host plant preferences and suitability exhibited by early-instar range caterpillar larvae. Environmental Entomology 7: 738-740.
6. DENT, D.R. & WALTON, M.P. (Eds) 1997. Methods in Ecological and Agricultural Entomology. CAB International, Wallingford.
7. ELLIS, A. & BOWERS, M.D. 1998. Effects of host plant species and artificial diet on growth of buckeye (Junonia coenia) and painted lady (Vanessa cardui) caterpillars (Nymphalidae). Journal of the Lepidopter-ist's Society 52: 73-83.
8. FREINA, J.J. DE & WITT, T.J. 1987. Die Bombyces und Sphinges der Westpaläarktis (Ins., Lepid.), Bd. 1. Edition Forschung & Wissenschaft Verlag GmbH, München.
9. GERSHENZON, J. & CROTEAU, R. 1991. Terpenoids. In: Rosenthal, G.A. & Berenbaum, M.R. (Eds). Herbivores. Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites. Volume I: The Chemical Participants. 165-219. 2nd Edition Academic Press, San Diego.
10. GØMEZ-CLEMENTE, F. 1941. Taragama repanda (Hübner), sobre naranjo. Boletín Patología Vegetal y Entomología Agrícola 10: 324-331.
11. HAUJIKOA, E. & NEUVONEN, S. 1985. The relationship between size and reproductive potential in male and female Epirrita autumnata (Lep., Geometridae). Ecological Entomology 10: 267-270.
12. JAENIKE, J. 1990. Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21: 234-273.
13. JERMY, T., HANSON, F.E. & DETHIER, V.G. 1968. Induction of specific food preference in lepidopterous larvae. Entomologia Experimentales et Applicata 11: 211-230.
14. MATTSON, W.J. 1980. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 119-161.
15. MOLINA, J.M. 1998. Lépidoptères asociados al cultivo del arándano en Andalucía Occidental. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal Plagas 24: 763-772.
16. MONTLLOR, C.B. & BERNAYS, E.A. 1993. Invertebrate predators and caterpillar foraging. In: Stamp. N.E. & Casey, T.M. (Eds) Caterpillars. Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging. 170-202. Chapman & Hall, New York.
17. MURUGAN, K. & GEORGE, A. 1992. Feeding and nutritional influence on growth and reproduction of Daphnis nerii (Linn.) (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 38: 961-967.
18. MUSTAPARTA, H. 1992. Specialization in herbivorous insects. In: Menken, S.B.J., Visser, J.H. & Harrewijn, P. (Eds) Proceedings, 8th International Symposium Insect-Plant Relationships. 395-399. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
19. NYLIN, S., WIKLUND, C., WICKMAN, P-O. & GARCÍA-BARROS, E. 1993. Absence of trade-offs between sexual size dimorphism and early male emergence in a butterfly. Ecology 74: 1414-1427.
20. REIJDEN, E.D. VAN DER & CHEW, F.S. 1992. Assessing host-plant suitability in caterpillars: is the weight worth the wait?. In: Menken, S.B.J., Visser, J.H. & Harrewijn, P. (Eds) Proceeedings, 8th International Symposium Insect-Plant Relationships. 69-70. Kluwer Dordrecht.
21. SCRIBER, J.M. & SLANSKY, F. 1981. The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annual Review of Entomology 26: 183-211.
22. SLANSKY, F. 1990. Insect nutritional ecology as a basis for studying host plant resistance. Florida Entomologist 73: 359-378.
23. SLANSKY, F.JR. 1993. Nutritional ecology: the fundamental quest for nutrients. In: Stamp, N.E. & Casey, (Eds) T.M. Caterpillars. Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints to Foraging. 29-91. Chapman & Hall. New York.
24. SMITH, C.M., KHAN, Z.R. & PATHAK, M.D. 1994. Techniques for Evaluating Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
25. STAMP, N.E. & WILKENS, R.T. 1993. On the cryptic side of life: being unapparent to enemies and the consequences for foraging and growth of caterpillars. In: Stamp, N.E. & Casey, T.M. (Eds) Caterpillars. Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints to Foraging. 283-330. Chapman & Hall, New York.
26. TAMMARU, T. & HAUKIOJA, E. 1996. Capital breeders and income breeders among Lepidoptera - consequences to population dynamics. OIKOS 77: 561-564.
27. ZHANG, B.CH. (1994). Index of Economically Important Lepidoptera. CAB International, Wallingford.