Quantum Tensor Product Structures are Observable Induced

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 6, 2004, Pages

  Zanardi, Paolo ^a,b   Lidar, Daniel A ^c   Lloyd, Seth ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b ISI FOUNDATION   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS; STATE SPACE METHODS; TENSORS;

MORPHING; QUANTUM COMPUTING; QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING (QIP); TENSOR PRODUCT STRUCTURES (TPS);

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 8744287124     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.060402     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. C.H. Bennett and D.P. DiVincenzo, Nature (London) 404, 247 (2000).10.1038/35005001
2. D.A. Meyer et al, Science 289, 1431 (2000).10.1126/science.289.5484.1431a
3. P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 077901 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.077901
4. L. Viola, E. Knill, and R. Laflamme, J. Phys. AJPHAC5 34, 7067 (2001);
5. L.-A. Wu and D.A. Lidar, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 43, 4506 (2002).10.1063/1.1499208
6. For an alternative perspective see H. Barnum et al, e-print quant-ph/0305023.
7. A state is said to be entangled if it cannot be written as a convex sum of tensor product states [R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989)]. 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277
8. D. Loss and D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevA.57.120
9. D. Bacon et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1758 (2000); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1758
10. D.P. DiVincenzo et al, Nature (London) 408, 339 (2000); 10.1038/35042541
11. P. Zanardi and S. Lloyd, e-print quant-ph/0305013 [Phys. Rev. A (to be published)].
12. D.A. Lidar and L.-A. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017905 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017905
13. F. Verstraete and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 010404 (2003); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.010404
14. S.D. Bartlett and H.M. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 097903 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.097903
15. D. Gottesman, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1862 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1862
16. Details of calculations for this and other examples are given in P. Zanardi et al, e-print quant-ph/0308043.
17. L.M. Duan and G.C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953 (1997); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1953
18. P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3306 (1997); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3306
19. D.A. Lidar et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2594
20. E. Knill et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2525 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2525
21. L. Viola et al, Science 293, 2059 (2001).10.1126/science.1064460