Qubits as parafermions

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Volumn 43, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 4506-4525

  Wu, L A ^a   Lidar, D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035981732     PISSN: 00222488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1499208     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. H.S. Green, Phys. Rev. 90, 270 (1953).
2. O.W. Greenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 598 (1964).
3. A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998).
4. N. March, W.H. Young, and S. Sampanthar, The Many-Body Problem in Quantum Mechanics (Dover, New York, 1995).
5. P. Jordan and E. Wigner, Z. Phys. 47, 631 (1928).
6. S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, quant-ph/0003137.
7. M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
8. †} = 0 for i ≠ j, can be used to define "parabosons:" particles with unlimited occupation number per mode, but without a natural tensor product structure. Finally, we note that the particle we are referring to as a parafermion is also known sometimes as a "hardcore boson," e.g., K. Bernardet et al., Phys. Rev. B 65, 104519 (2002).
9. †} = 0 for i ≠ j, can be used to define "parabosons:" particles with unlimited occupation number per mode, but without a natural tensor product structure. Finally, we note that the particle we are referring to as a parafermion is also known sometimes as a "hardcore boson," e.g., K. Bernardet et al., Phys. Rev. B 65, 104519 (2002).
10. O.W. Greenberg and K.I. Macrae, Nucl. Phys. B 219, 358 (1983).
11. G.D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics, 3rd ed. (Kluwer Academic, New York, 2000).
12. D. Loss and D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998).
13. J.I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995).
14. P. Chen, C. Piermarocchi, and L.J. Sham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067401 (2001).
15. S. Lloyd, Science 273, 1073 (1996).
16. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G.J. Milburn, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001).
17. T.C. Ralph, W.J. Munro, and G.J. Milbum, quant-ph/0110115.
18. L.-A. Wu and D.A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. A 65, 042318 (2002).
19. D.A. Lidar and L.-A. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017905 (2002).
20. B. Wybourne, Classical Groups for Physicists (Wiley, New York, 1974).
21. S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 346 (1995), See N. Weaver, J. Math. Phys. 41, 240 (2000) for a formal proof.
22. S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 346 (1995), See N. Weaver, J. Math. Phys. 41, 240 (2000) for a formal proof.
23. D. Bacon, J. Kempe, D.A. Lidar, and K.B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1758 (2000).
24. D.P. DiVincenzo, D. Bacon, J. Kempe, G. Burkard, and K.B. Whaley, Nature (London) 408, 339 (2000).
25. D. Bacon, J. Kempe, D.P. DiVincenzo, D.A. Lidar, and K.B. Whaley, in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Experimental Implementations of Quantum Computation, Sydney, Australia, edited by R. Clark (Rinton, Princeton, NJ, 2001), p. 257.
26. D.A. Lidar, D. Bacon, J. Kempe, and K.B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. A 63, 022307 (2001).
27. A. Barenco, C.H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D.P. DiVincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J. Smolin, and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457 (1995).
28. D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 51, 1015 (1995).
29. B. Judd and J. Elliott, Topics in Atomic and Nuclear Theory (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, N.Z., 1970).
30. C.D. Batista and G. Ortiz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1082 (2001).
31. B.M. Terhal and D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032325 (2002).
32. E. Knill, "Fermionic Linear Optics and Matchgates," quant-ph/0108033.
33. A. Imamoglu, D.D. Awschalom, G. Burkard, D.P. DiVincenzo, D. Loss, M. Sherwin, and A. Small, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4204 (1999).
34. L. Viola, E. Knill, and R. Laflamme, J. Phys. A 34, 7067 (2001).
35. P.M. Platzman and M.I. Dykman, Science 284, 1967 (1999).
36. M.I. Dykman and P.M. Platzman, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 1095 (2000).
37. L.-A. Wu, M.S. Byrd, and D.A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057904 (2002).
38. P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 65, 042101 (2002).
39. I.L. Chuang and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3489 (1995).
40. R. Ionicioiu and P. Zanardi, quant-ph/0204118.
41. L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics Part 1 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1989).
42. C. Slichter, Principles of Magnetic Resonance, No. 1 in Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences (Springer, Berlin, 1996).
43. K.V. Kavokin, Phys. Rev. B 64, 075305 (2001).
44. N.E. Bonesteel, D. Stepanenko, and D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 207901 (2001).
45. G. Burkard and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 047903 (2002).
46. L.-A. Wu and D.A. Lidar, quant-ph/0202135.
47. V. Privman, I.D. Vagner, and G. Kventsel, Phys. Lett. A 239, 141 (1998).
48. D. Mozyrsky, V. Privman, and M.L. Glasser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5112 (2001).
49. L. Quiroga and N.F. Johnson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2270 (1999).
50. S.-B. Zheng and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 (2000).
51. B.E. Kane, Nature (London) 393, 133 (1998).
52. R. Vrijen, E. Yablonovitch, K. Wang, H.W. Jiang, A. Balandin, V. Roychowdhury, T. Mor, and D. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 62, 012306 (2000).
53. L.-M. Duan and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 737 (1998).
54. J. Kempe, D. Bacon, D.A. Lidar, and K.B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. A 63, 042307 (2001).
55. P.G. Kwiat, A.J. Berglund, J.B. Altepeter, and A.G. White, Science 290, 498 (2000).
56. D. Kielpinski, V. Meyer, M.A. Rowe, C.A. Sackett, W.M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D.J. Wineland, Science 291, 1013 (2001).
57. R.N. Cahn, Semi-Simple Lie Algebras and Their Representations (Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, MA, 1984), available online at http://www-physics.lbl.gov/∼rncahn/book.html.
58. That arbitrary single-qudit operations, together with a controlled operation between two qudits, are sufficient for universal quantum computation, follows from Theorem 1 in J.-L. Brylinski and R. Brylinski, quant-ph/0108062.