Negotiating from Mars to Venus: Gender in simulated international negotiations

Simulation & Gaming

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 226-248

  Florea, Natalie B ^a   Boyer, Mark A ^a   Brown, Scott W ^a   Butler, Michael J ^a   Hernandez, Magnolia ^a   Weir, Kimberly ^a   Meng, Lin ^a   Johnson, Paula R ^a   Lima, Clarisse ^a   Mayall, Hayley J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

computer mediated simulation; conflict resolution; decision making; gender; GLOBALED PROJECT; international negotiation; interpersonal interaction; negotiation styles

Indexed keywords

EID: 8744261441     PISSN: 10468781     EISSN: 1552826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046878103034002005     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
2. Bazerman, M.H. (1983). Negotiator judgment: A critical look at the rationality assumption. American Behavioral Scientist, 27(2), 211-228.
3. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J.M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.
4. Berton, P., Kimura, H., & Zartmaneds, I.W. (Eds.). (1999). International negotiation: Actors, structure/process, values. New York: St. Martin's.
5. Boyer, M. A., & Brown, S.W. (2001, October 11). What if women ran the world? Hartford Courant, p. A11.
6. Boyer, M. A., et al. (2002, March). Interacting with globalization: Evidence from the next generation of citizens as policy-makers. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Conference, New Orleans, LA.
7. Brown, S. W., & King, F.B. (2000). Constructivist pedagogy and how we learn: Educational psychology meets international studies. International Studies Perspectives, 1(3), 245-254.
8. Brown, S. W., & Mayall, H.J. (2000). ICONS 2000: An evaluation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
9. Brown, S. W., & Mayall, H.J. (2001). ICONS 2001: An evaluation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.
10. Brown, S. W., et al. (2002, April). Gender differences in a problem-based learning environment: Do they exist? Paper presented at the 2002 American Educational Research Association Conference, New Orleans, LA.
11. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Deaux, K.K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39(2), 105-116.
13. de Boer, C. (1985). The polls: The European peace movement and deployment of nuclear missiles. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 119-132.
14. Eisenstein, H. (1984). Contemporary feminist thought. London: Unwin Paperbacks.
15. Elshtain, J.B. (1987). Women and war. New York: Basic Books.
16. Enloe, C. (1990). Bananas, beaches, and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. London: Pandora.
17. Enloe, C. (1993). The morning after: Sexual politics at the end of the cold war. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Fite, D., Genest, M., & Wilcox, C. (1990, October). Gender differences in foreign policy attitudes. American Political Quarterly, 18, 492-513.
19. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Florea, N.B. (2003). The challenge of human security in the United Nations: A case for gender mainstreaming. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.
21. Frankovic, K. (1982). Sex and politics: New alignments, old issues. Political Science and Politics, 15, 439-448.
22. Gierycz, D. (2001). Women, peace and the United Nations: Beyond Beijing. In I. Skjelsbaek & D. Smith (Eds.), Gender, peace, and conflict (pp. 14-31). London: Sage.
23. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Goldstein, J.S. (2001). War and gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
25. Greenhalgh, L., & Gilkey, R.W. (1986). Our game, your rules: Developing effective negotiating approaches. In L. Moore (Ed.), Not as far as you think: The realities of working women (pp. 135-148). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
26. Harvey, F. P., & Brecher, M. (Eds.). (2002). Critical perspectives in international studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
27. Hopmann, T.P. (1996). The negotiation process and the resolution of international conflicts. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
28. Jonsson, C., & Hall, M. (2003). Communication: An essential aspect of diplomacy. International Studies Perspective, 4(2), 194-209.
29. Kardam, N. (2002). The emergence of a global gender equity regime. International Journal, 57, 409-438.
30. Kissinger, H. (1969). The Vietnam negotiations. Foreign Affairs, 47(2), 211-234.
31. Kolb, D. M., & Coolidge, G.G. (1995). Her place at the table: A consideration of gender issues in negotiation. In J.W. Breslin & J.Z. Rubin (Eds.), Negotiation theory and practice (pp. 261-277). Cambridge, MA: Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.
32. Kremenyuk, V.M. (Ed.). (1991). International negotiation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C.N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35. Mayall, H.J. (2002). An exploratory/descriptive look at gender differences in technology self-efficacy and academic self-efficacy in the GLOBALED PROJECT. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
36. McGlen, N. E., & Sarkees, M.R. (1993). Women in foreign policy: The insiders. New York: Routledge.
37. Miller, E. (1991). Men at risk. Kingston: Jamaica Publishing House.
38. Miller, E. (2001). Gender, power, and politics: An alternative perspective. In I. Skjelsbaek & D. Smith (Eds.), Gender, peace, and conflict (pp. 80-103). London: Sage.
39. Miller, J.B. (1976). Toward the new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.
40. Mueller, J. (1973). War, presidents, and public opinion. New York: John Wiley.
41. Mueller, J. (1994). Policy and opinion in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B.R. (1975). The psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
43. Salla, M. (2001). Women and war, men and pacifism. In I. Skjelsbaek & D. Smith (Eds.), Gender, peace, and conflict (pp. 68-79). London: Sage.
44. Sampson, E.E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43(1), 15-22.
45. Sharp, P. (1999). For diplomacy: Representation and the study of international relations. International Studies Review, 1(1), 33-58.
46. Skjelsbaek, I., & Smith, D. (Eds.). (2001). Gender, peace, and conflict. London: Sage.
47. Smith, D. (2001). The problem of essentialism. In I. Skjelsbaek & D. Smith (Eds.), Gender, peace, and conflict (pp. 32-46). London: Sage.
48. Snyder, S. (1999). Negotiating on the edge: North Korean negotiating behavior. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute for Peace Press.
49. Solomon, R.H. (1999). Chinese negotiating behavior: Pursuing interests through “old friends”. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute for Peace Press.
50. Tickner, J.A. (1992). Gender in international relations. New York: Columbia University Press.
51. Tickner, J.A. (1994). Feminist perspectives on peace and world security in the post-cold war era. In M.T. Klare (Ed.), Peace and world security studies: A curriculum guide. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
52. Tickner, J.A. (2001). Gendering world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
53. Tickner, J.A. (2002). Feminist perspectives on 9/11. International Studies Perspectives, 3(4), 333-350.
54. United Nations (UN). (1995 a, September). The Beijing Declaration and the platform for action (Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing, China, 4015, DPI/1766/Wom). New York: United Nations, Department of Public Information.
55. United Nations (UN). (1995 b). Participation of women in political life and decision-making (No. E/CN.6/1995/12). New York: Author.
56. United Nations (UN). (1995 c). Women 2000: The role of women in the United Nations peacekeeping (No. 1). New York: Author.
57. United Nations (UN). (1996). Implementation of the outcome of the Fourth World Conference on Women (Report of the Secretary-General, No. A/51/322). New York: Author.
58. United Nations Development Program. (2001). Human Development Report. New York: United Nations.
59. United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women. (1994). Gender and the agenda for peace (Report of the Secretary-General, No. GAP/1994/1). New York: Author.
60. Watson, C., & Kasten, B. (1988). Separate strengths? How women and men negotiate. Newark, NJ: Center for Negotiation and Conflict Resolution at Rutgers University.
61. Yamada, E. M., Tjosvold, D., & Draguns, G.J. (1983). Effects of sex-linked situations and sex composition on cooperation and style of interaction. Sex Roles, 9(4), 541-553.
62. Zartman, W.I. (Ed.). (1976). The 50% solution: How to bargain successfully with hijackers, strikers, bosses, oil magnates, Arabs, Russians, and other worthy opponents in this modern world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
63. Zartman, W. I., & Rubin, J.Z. (2000). Power and negotiation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.