Characterisation of the diatom photophobic response to high irradiance

Diatom Research

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 167-179

  Conn, Stanley A ^a   Bahena, Marlene ^a   Davis, Julia T ^a   Ragland, Ryan L ^a   Rauschenberg, Carlton D ^a   Smith, Brenda J ^a  

^a DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIATOM; IRRADIANCE; LIGHT;

BACILLARIOPHYTA; CRATICULA; CRATICULA CUSPIDATA;

EID: 8744244340     PISSN: 0269249X     EISSN: 21598347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0269249X.2004.9705869     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. BERTRAND, J., 1992. Mouvements des diatomées. II. Synthèse des mouvements. Cryptogamie Algologie, 13:49–71.
2. BERTRAND, J., 1999. Mouvements des diatomées. VI. Les efforts pendant le déplacement apical mesures, analyses, relations:longeur, vitesse, force. Cryptogamie Algologie, 20:43–57.
3. BRAY, D., 2001. Cell Movements, 2nd edition, 372New York:Garland Publishing.
4. COHN, S. A., 2001. “ Photo-stimulated effects on diatom motility ”. In Photomovement, Edited by:Häder, D. P., and Lebert, M. L., 375–402. Amsterdam:Elsevier.
5. COHN, S. A., and DISPARTI, N. C., 1994. Environmental factors influencing diatom cell motility. Journal of Phycology, 30:818–828.
6. COHN, S. A., and WEITZELL, R. E., 1996. Ecological considerations of diatom cell motility:I. Characterization of motility and adhesion in four diatom species. Journal of Phycology, 32:928–939.
7. COHN, S. A., SPURCK, T. P., and PICKETT-HEAPS, J. D., 1999. High energy irradiation at the leading tip of moving diatoms causes a rapid change of cell direction. Diatom Research, 14:193–206.
8. COHN, S. A., DAVIS, J. T., SMITH, B. J., and SCHULZE, J. R., 2002. Effect of multiple species and previous light exposure on motile responses in diatoms. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 13 (S):470a (Abstract)
9. COHN, S. A., FARRELL, J. F., MUNRO, J. D., RAGLAND, R. L., WEITZELL, R. E., and WIBISONO, B. L., 2003. The effect of temperature and mixed species composition on diatom motility and adhesion. Diatom Research, 18:225–243.
10. COOKSEY, B., and COOKSEY, K. E., 1980. Calcium is necessary for motility in the diatom. Amphora coffeaeformis. Plant Physiology, 65:129–131.
11. COOKSEY, K. E., 1981. Requirement for calcium in adhesion of a fouling diatom to glass. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 41:1378–1382.
12. EDGAR, L. A., and PICKETT-HEAPS, J. D., 1982. Ultrastructural localization of polysaccharides in the motile diatom. Navicula cuspidata. Protoplasma, 113:10–22.
13. EDGAR, L. A., and PICKETT-HEAPS, J. D., 1983. The mechanism of diatom locomotion. I. An ultrastructural study of the motility apparatus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 218:331–343.
14. EDGAR, L. A., and PICKETT-HEAPS, J. D., 1984. “ Diatom locomotion ”. In Progress in Phycological Research, Edited by:Round, F. E., and Chapman, D. J., Vol. 3, 47–88. Bristol:Biopress Limited.
15. EDGAR, L. A., and ZAVORTINK, M., 1983. The mechanism of diatom locomotion. II. Identification of actin. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 218:345–348.
16. FALCIATORE, A., D'ALCALA, M. R., CROOT, P., and BOWLER, C., 2000. Perception of environmental signals by a marine diatom. Science, 288:2363–2365.
17. GERSTNER, W., and KISTLER, W. M., 2002. Spiking Neuron Models. Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity, 494Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
18. HÄDER, D.-P., and HOICZYK, E., 1992. “ Gliding Motility ”. In Algal Cell Motility, Edited by:Melkonian, M., 1–38. New York:Chapman and Hall.
19. HARPER, M. A., 1977. “ Movements ”. In The Biology of Diatoms, Edited by:Werner, D., 224–249. Berkeley:University of California Press.
20. HAUPT, W., 1982. Light-mediated movement of chloroplaste. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 33:205–233.
21. HAY, S. I., MAITLAND, T. C., and PATERSON, D. M., 1993. The speed of diatom migration through natural and artificial substrata. Diatom Research, 8:371–384.
22. JOHNSON, R. E., TUCHMAN, N. C., and PETERSON, C. G., 1996. Changes in the vertical microdistribution of diatoms within a developing periphyton mat. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 16:503–519.
23. KASAHARA, M., KAGAWA, T., OIKAWA, K., SUETSUGU, N., MIYAO, M., and WADA, M., 2002. Chloroplast avoidance movement reduces photodamage in plants. Nature, 420:829–832.
24. MEWES, H., and RICHTER, M., 2002. Supplementary ultraviolet-B radiation induces a rapid reversal of the diadinoxanthin cycle in the strong light-exposed diatom. Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Plant Physiology, 130:1527–1535.
25. NULTSCH, W., 1971. Phototactic and photokinetic action spectra of the diatom. Nitzschia communis. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 14:705–712.
26. NULTSCH, W., 1975. “ Phototaxis and photokinesis ”. In Primitive Sensory and Communication Systems, Edited by:Carlile, M. J., 29–90. New York:Academic Press.
27. NULTSCH, W., and HÄDER, D.-P., 1988. Photomovement in motile microorganisms—II. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 47:837–869.
28. POULSEN, N. C., SPECTOR, I., SPURCK, T. P., SCHULTZ, T. F., and WETHERBEE, R., 1999. Diatom gliding is the result of an actin-myosin motility system. Cytoskeleton and Cell Motility, 44:23–33.
29. ROUND, F. E., and CRAWFORD, R. M., 1990. “ The Bacillariophyta ”. In Handbook of Protoctista, Edited by:Margulis, L., Corliss, J., Melkonian, M., and Chapman, D. J., 574–599. Boston:Jones and Bartlett.
30. ROUND, F. E., and PALMER, J. D., 1966. Persistent vertical migration rhythms in benthic microflora. II. Field and laboratory studies on diatoms from the bank of the River Avon. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 46:191–224.
31. ROUND, F. E., CRAWFORD, R. M., and MANN, D. G., 1990. The Diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera, 747Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
32. SMITH, H. L., 1888. A contribution to the life history of the Diatomaceae—Part II. Proceedings of the American Society of Microbiology, 9:126–167.
33. SPURCK, T. P., STONINGTON, O. G., SNYDER, J. A., PICKETT-HEAPS, J. D., BAJER, A., and MOLE-BAJER, J., 1990. UV-microbeam irradiations of the mitotic spindle. II. Spindle fiber dynamics and force production. Journal of Cell Biology, 111:1505–1518.
34. STEVENSON, R. J., and PETERSON, C. G., 1989. Variation in benthic diatom (Bacillariophyceae) immigration with habitat characteristics and cell morphology. Journal of Phycology, 25:120–129.
35. STEVENSON, R. J., PETERSON, C. G., KIRSCHTEL, D. B., KING, C. C., and TUCHMAN, N. C., 1991. Density-dependent growth, ecological strategies, and effects of nutrients and shading on benthic diatom succession in streams. Journal of Phycology, 27:59–69.
36. STONINGTON, O. G., SPURCK, T. P., SNYDER, J. A., and PICKETT-HEAPS, J. D., 1989. UV-microbeam irradiations of the mitotic spindle. I. The UV microbeam apparatus. Protoplasma, 153:62–70.
37. WEBSTER, D. R., COOKSEY, K. E., and RUBIN, R. W., 1985. An investigation of the involvement of cytoskeletal structures and secretion in gliding motility of the marine diatom, Amphora coffeaeformis. Cell Motility, 5:103–122.
38. WENDEROTH, K., 1982a. “ Photokinese und photophobische Reaktionen der Kieselalge ”. In Navicula peregrina, Göttingen, Germany:Institut für den Wissenschaftlichen Film. Biologie Film #C1388, Postfach 2351, 37013
39. WENDEROTH, K., 1982b. Reaktion der Kieselalge Navicula peregrina auf Belichtung verschiedener Zellabschnitte, Göttingen, Germany:Institut für den Wissenschaftlichen Film. Biologie Film #C1466, Postfach 2351, 37013
40. WENDEROTH, K., 1983. Phototaxis bei Desmidiaceen und Diatomeen. Biologie Film #C1496, Göttingen, Germany:Institut für den Wissenschaftlichen Film. Postfach 2351, 37013
41. WENDEROTH, K., 1984. Wirkungsspektrum der Step-down-Reaktion bei Diatomeen, Göttingen, Germany:Institut für den Wissenschaftlichen Film. Biologie Film #C1520, Postfach 2351, 37013
42. WILSON, P., and FORER, A., 1987. Irradiations of rabbit myofibrils with an ultraviolet microbeam. I. Effects of ultraviolet light on the myofibril components necessary for contraction. Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 65:363–375.