Educational interactive multimedia software: Can it effectively teach engineering concepts?

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 3, Issue , 1999, Pages 435-441

  Reamon, Derek T ^a   Sheppard, Sheri D ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULA; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS;

DESIGN PROJECTS; DIRECT CURRENT; EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS; ENGINEERING CONCEPTS; INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARES; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; TEACHING TECHNIQUES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 8744224101     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC99/DTM-8783     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Oppenheimer, T., The Computer Delusion, in The Atlantic Monthly. 1997. p. 45-62.
2. Banks, G.M., Qualifying paper and mini proposal, in Education. 1994, Stanford University: Stanford. p. 42.
3. Buckley, B.C., Multimedia, misconceptions, and working models of biological phenomena: Learning about the circulatoiy system, in Education. 1992, Stanford University: Stanford. p. 301.
4. Rogers, Y. and M. Scaife. How Can Interactive Multimedia Facilitate Learning in Works hop on Intelligence and Multimodality in Multimedia Inteifaces. 1996. Edinburgh, Scotland: AAAI Press.
5. Mayer, R.E., Multimedia Learning: Are We Asking the Right Questions Educational Psychologist, 1997. 32(1): p. 1-19.
6. Lopuck, L., Designing Multimedia, ed. L. Sizensky. 1996, Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
7. Reeves, B. and C. Nass, The Media Equation. 1996, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 305.
8. Flori, R.E., M.A. Koen, and D.B. Oglesby, Basic Engineering Software for Teaching Dynamics. ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, 1996: p. 6 1-67.
9. Regan, M. and S.D. Sheppard, Interactive Multimedia Courseware and Hands-on Learning Experience: An Assessment Study. ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, 1996. 85(2): p. 123-130.
10. Waterworth, J.A., Multimedia Interaction with Computers. 1992, Chichester, West Sussex, England: Ellis Horwood Limited. 213.
11. Wilde, D.J. Using Student Preferences to Guide Design Team Composition. in Design Engineering Technical Conferences. 1997. Sacramento, CA: ASME.
12. Wankat and Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering. 1993, New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
13. Claxton, C.S. and P.H. Murrell, Learning Styles: Implications for Improving Educational Practices. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, ed. J.D. Fife. Vol. 4. 1987, College Station, TX: Association for the Study of Higher Education. 103.
14. Felder, R., Matters of Style. ASEE Prism, 1998(April 1998).
15. Reaion. I., Educational Inu 1/2,acti ie Muinnietha Softu 1/2are: The Inii)act of I,teract,i 1/2itv on L 1/2ariung, in Mechiaucal Eiigiu 1/2 1/2iing. 1999, Stanford University: Stanford. CA. p. I 7X.