Foot infinitives in child second language English: An aspectual features account

Second Language Research

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 335-371

  Gavruseva, Elena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 8644266148     PISSN: 02676583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0267658304sr244oa     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Armon-Lotem, S. 1997: Root infinitives in child second language acquisition. McGill working papers in linguistics 13, 11-17.
2. Baker, M.C. 2003: Lexical categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bloom, L., Lifter, K. and Hafitz, J. 1980: Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language 56, 386-412.
4. Borer, H. 1994: The projection of arguments. In Benedicto, E. and Runner, J., editors, UMass occasional papers in linguistics. Amherst, MA: GLSA, 19-47.
5. de Swart, H. 1998: Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 347-85.
6. Dowty, D. 1979: Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
7. Gavruseva, E. 2002: Is there primacy of aspect in child L2 English? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5, 109-30.
8. - 2003: Aktionsart, aspect, and the acquisition of finiteness in early child grammar. Linguistics 41, 723-55.
9. Gavruseva, E. and Lardiere, D. 1996: The emergence of extended phrase structure in child L2 acquisition. In Stringfellow, A., Chana-Amitay, D., Hughes, E. and Zukowski, A., editors, BUCLD Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 225-36.
10. Grimshaw, J. 1994: Minimal projection and clausal structure. In Lust, B., Suñer, M. and Whitman, J., editors, Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Grondin, N. and White, L. 1996: Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French. Language Acquisition 1, 1-34.
12. Guéron, J. 2002: Sur la syntaxe de l'aspect. In Laca, B., editor, Temps et Aspect. Science du Language, 99-121.
13. Haznedar, B. 2001: The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, 1-39.
14. Haznedar, B. and Schwartz, B.D. 1997: Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In Hughes, E., Hughes, M. and Greenhill, A., editors, BUCLD Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 257-68.
15. Ionin, T. and Wexler, K. 2002: Why is 'is' easier than '-s'?: acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research 18, 95-136.
16. Joos, M. 1964: The english verb: form and meanings. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
17. Krifka, M. 1989: Nominal reference, temporal constitution, and quantification in event semantics. In Bartsch, R., van Benthem, J. and van Emde Boas, P., editors, Semantics and contextual expression. Dordrecht: Foris, 75-115.
18. Lardiere, D. 1998: Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research 14, 359-75.
19. Ouhalla, J. 1990: Sentential negation, relativized minimality and the aspectual status of auxiliaries. Linguistic Review 7, 183-231.
20. Paradis, J. and Crago, M. 2000: Tense and temporality: similarities and differences between language-impaired and second-language children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43, 834-48.
21. Paradis, J., Le Corre, M. and Genesee, F. 1998: The emergence of tense and agreement in child L2 French. Second Language Research 14, 227-56.
22. Partee, B. 1999: Nominal and temporal semantic structure: aspect and quantification. In Hajičová, E., Hoskovec, T., Leška, O., Sgall, P. and Skoumalová, Z., editors, Prague linguistic circle papers. Volume 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 99-108.
23. Phillips, C. 1995: Syntax at age two: Crosslinguistic differences. In Schütze, C.T., Ganger, J.B. and Broihier, K. editors, MIT working papers in linguistics 26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 325-82.
24. Prévost, P. 1997: Truncation in early child SLA: evidence from L2 French and German production data. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 13, 143-53.
25. Prévost, P. and White, L. 2000: Accounting for morphological variation in second language acquisition: truncation or missing inflection? In Friedemann, M-A. and Rizzi, L., editors, The acquisition of syntax. London: Longman, 202-35.
26. Rizzi, L. 1993/94: Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: the case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3, 371-93.
27. Rohde, A. 1996: The aspect hypothesis and the emergence of tense distinctions in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics 34, 1115-37.
28. Shirai, Y. and Andersen, R.W. 1995: The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: a prototype account. Language 71, 743-61.
29. Tenny, C. 1992: The aspectual interface hypothesis. In Sag, I.A. and Szabolcsi, A., editors, Lexical matters. CSLI Lecture Notes 24. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 1-27.
30. Vendler, Z. 1967: Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 56, 143-60.
31. Verkuyl, H. 1972: On the compositional nature of aspect. Dordrecht: Reidel.
32. - 1999: Aspectual issues: studies on time and quantity. Stanford University, CA: CSLI.