New engineering faculty for the new millennium

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 4409-4419

  Homkes, Rick ^a   Morales, Carlos R ^a   Rowe, Kenneth E ^a   Smith, Mark L ^a,b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY CALUMET   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOMS; ENGINEERING FACULTY; INDUSTRIAL PRESENTATIONS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS (IS);

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; LABORATORIES; PUBLISHING; QUERY LANGUAGES; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 8644245903     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bloom, B., et al, The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of the Educational Goals. Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. McKay Press, New York, USA (1956).
2. Langan, D., Doran, M., Feinstein, D., & Longenecker, H., A cognitive-based approach to the implementation to the introductory computer science programming sequence. 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Washington, DC, USA, Session 1626 [CD-ROM] (1996).
3. Internal Document. Computer Technology Department, School of Technology, Purdue University (1998).
4. Fairweather, J.S., Education: The forgotten element in industry-university relationships. The Review of Higher Education, 14, 1, 33-41 (1991).
5. Brunn, S.D., Hiring, evaluation, promotion and tenure decisions is a US geography department. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 14,2, 111-123 (1990).
6. Walker, D., Universities in Britain agree to tenure changes to get bigger grants. Chronicles of Higher Education, 33, 13, 1-32 (1986).
7. Shifflet, B., & Patterson, P., Succeeding in the tenure and promotion process. Physical Educator, 52, 3, 160-169 (1995).
8. Marsh, J.C., Should scholarly production be the primary criterion for tenure decisions? Yes. Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 2, 132-135 (1992).
9. Collins, M.L., The reform of teacher education: Is it possible? Contemporary Education, 69, 1, 48-52 (1997).
10. Schoenfeld, A.C. & Magnan, R., Mentor in a Manual, Madison, WI: Magna Publications, 177 (1992).
11. DePasquale, S., Hendricks, M., & Keiger, D., "Tenure Under Scrutiny", John Hopkins Magazine, http://www.jhu.edu/~jhumag/0997web/ tenure.html, September, (1997).
12. Whicker, M. L., Kronefeld, J.J., & Strickland, R.A., Getting Tenure, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 80 (1993).
13. Homkes, R., Writing and publishing your way to tenure. 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, [CD-ROM: \papers\2275\227503ms.pdf - 7 pages]. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (1966).
14. Schoenfeld, A.C. & Magnan, R., Mentor in a Manual, Madison, WI: Magna Publications, 216-217 (1992).
15. Summerfield, M., "Issues in the Economics of Scholarly Communication", Columbia International Affairs Online, http://ww.columbia. edu/cu/libraries/digital/texts/econpap.html, March, (1998).
16. Magner, D., Tenure will be harder to get, experts say, but it won't disappear. Chronicle of Higher Education, 14 (1998, October 23).
17. Faculty Handbook for Academic Promotion and Tenure (3rd ed.). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University School of Technology, 2 (1995).