-
1
-
-
84981834016
-
The unfavorable cervix and induction of labor using a cervical balloon
-
Embrey M.P., Mollison B.G. The unfavorable cervix and induction of labor using a cervical balloon. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common. 74:1967;44-45
-
(1967)
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common
, vol.74
, pp. 44-45
-
-
Embrey, M.P.1
Mollison, B.G.2
-
2
-
-
0027210102
-
A randomized clinical trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervix
-
Rouben D., Arias F. A randomized clinical trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 82:1993;290-293
-
(1993)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.82
, pp. 290-293
-
-
Rouben, D.1
Arias, F.2
-
3
-
-
0028299856
-
Induction of labor by balloon catheter: A randomized comparison with PGE2 vaginal peccaries
-
Lyndrup J., Nickelsen C., Weber T., Molnitz E., Guldbaek E. Induction of labor by balloon catheter: a randomized comparison with PGE2 vaginal peccaries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 47:1994;189-192
-
(1994)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
, vol.47
, pp. 189-192
-
-
Lyndrup, J.1
Nickelsen, C.2
Weber, T.3
Molnitz, E.4
Guldbaek, E.5
-
4
-
-
0032860537
-
Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labour at term in nulliparous women
-
Seyb S.T., Berka R.J., Socol M.L., Dooley S.L. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labour at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 94:1999;600-607
-
(1999)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.94
, pp. 600-607
-
-
Seyb, S.T.1
Berka, R.J.2
Socol, M.L.3
Dooley, S.L.4
-
5
-
-
0020044075
-
Prostaglandin levels in amniotic fluid during balloon-induced cervical softening and labor at term
-
Manabe Y., Manabe A., Takahashi A. Prostaglandin levels in amniotic fluid during balloon-induced cervical softening and labor at term. Prostaglandins. 23:1982;247-248
-
(1982)
Prostaglandins
, vol.23
, pp. 247-248
-
-
Manabe, Y.1
Manabe, A.2
Takahashi, A.3
-
6
-
-
0024342785
-
Ripening the highly unfavorable cervix with extraamniotic saline instillation or vaginal prostaglandin E2 application
-
Schreyer P., Sherman D.J., Arieli S. Ripening the highly unfavorable cervix with extraamniotic saline instillation or vaginal prostaglandin E2 application. Obstet Gynecol. 73:1989;938-942
-
(1989)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.73
, pp. 938-942
-
-
Schreyer, P.1
Sherman, D.J.2
Arieli, S.3
-
7
-
-
0028299856
-
Induction of labor by balloon catheter with extraamniotic saline infusion: A randomized comparison with PGE2 vaginal pessaries
-
Lyndrup J., Nickelsen C., Weber T. Induction of labor by balloon catheter with extraamniotic saline infusion: a randomized comparison with PGE2 vaginal pessaries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 53:1994;189-192
-
(1994)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
, vol.53
, pp. 189-192
-
-
Lyndrup, J.1
Nickelsen, C.2
Weber, T.3
-
8
-
-
0028589998
-
Use of Foley catheter as a cervical ripening agent prior to induction of labor
-
James C., Peedicayil A., Sheshadri L. Use of Foley catheter as a cervical ripening agent prior to induction of labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 47:1994;229-232
-
(1994)
Int J Gynecol Obstet
, vol.47
, pp. 229-232
-
-
James, C.1
Peedicayil, A.2
Sheshadri, L.3
-
9
-
-
0036794735
-
A comparison of vaginally administered misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction
-
Mullin P.M., House M., Paul R.H., Wing D.A. A comparison of vaginally administered misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 187:2002;847-852
-
(2002)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.187
, pp. 847-852
-
-
Mullin, P.M.1
House, M.2
Paul, R.H.3
Wing, D.A.4
-
10
-
-
0035082741
-
A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening
-
Sciscione A.C., Nguyen L., Manley J., Pollock M., Maas B., Colmorgen G. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol. 97:2001;603-607
-
(2001)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.97
, pp. 603-607
-
-
Sciscione, A.C.1
Nguyen, L.2
Manley, J.3
Pollock, M.4
Maas, B.5
Colmorgen, G.6
-
12
-
-
0036482770
-
A randomized comparison of early versus late amniotomy following cervical ripening with a Foley catheter
-
Levy R., Ferber A., Ben-Arie A., Paz B., Hazan Y., Blickstein I., et al. A randomized comparison of early versus late amniotomy following cervical ripening with a Foley catheter. BJOG. 109:2002;168-172
-
(2002)
BJOG
, vol.109
, pp. 168-172
-
-
Levy, R.1
Ferber, A.2
Ben-Arie, A.3
Paz, B.4
Hazan, Y.5
Blickstein, I.6
-
13
-
-
0036206706
-
Risk factors and outcome of failure to progress during the first stage of labor: A population-based study
-
Sheiner E., Levy A., Feinstein U., Hallak M., Mazor M. Risk factors and outcome of failure to progress during the first stage of labor: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 81:2002;222-226
-
(2002)
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
, vol.81
, pp. 222-226
-
-
Sheiner, E.1
Levy, A.2
Feinstein, U.3
Hallak, M.4
Mazor, M.5
-
14
-
-
72949135423
-
Induction of labor
-
Garrett W.J. Induction of labor. Med J Aust. 47:1960;929-935
-
(1960)
Med J Aust
, vol.47
, pp. 929-935
-
-
Garrett, W.J.1
-
16
-
-
0038677108
-
Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix
-
Johnson D.P., Davis N.R., Brown A.J. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 188:2003;1565-1569
-
(2003)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.188
, pp. 1565-1569
-
-
Johnson, D.P.1
Davis, N.R.2
Brown, A.J.3
-
17
-
-
0032711380
-
A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term
-
Abramovici D., Goldwasser S., Mabie B.C., Mercer B.M., Goldwasser R., Sibai B.M. A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 181:1999;1108-1112
-
(1999)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.181
, pp. 1108-1112
-
-
Abramovici, D.1
Goldwasser, S.2
Mabie, B.C.3
Mercer, B.M.4
Goldwasser, R.5
Sibai, B.M.6
-
18
-
-
0035120224
-
Balloon cervical ripening with extra-amniotic infusion of saline or prostaglandin E2: A double-blind, randomized controlled study
-
Sherman D.J., Frenkel E., Pansky M., Caspi E., Bukovsky I., Langer R. Balloon cervical ripening with extra-amniotic infusion of saline or prostaglandin E2: a double-blind, randomized controlled study. Obstet Gynecol. 97:2001;375-380
-
(2001)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.97
, pp. 375-380
-
-
Sherman, D.J.1
Frenkel, E.2
Pansky, M.3
Caspi, E.4
Bukovsky, I.5
Langer, R.6
-
19
-
-
17944388091
-
Cervical ripening; A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone
-
Perry K.G. Jr., Larmon J.E., May W.L., Robinette L.G., Martin R.W. Cervical ripening; a randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone. Am. J Obstet Gynecol. 178:1998;1333-1340
-
(1998)
Am. J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.178
, pp. 1333-1340
-
-
Perry Jr., K.G.1
Larmon, J.E.2
May, W.L.3
Robinette, L.G.4
Martin, R.W.5
-
20
-
-
0036087936
-
Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of techniques
-
Barrilleaux P.S., Bofill J.A., Terrone D.A., Magann E.F., May W.L., Morri J.C. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 186:2002;1124-1129
-
(2002)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.186
, pp. 1124-1129
-
-
Barrilleaux, P.S.1
Bofill, J.A.2
Terrone, D.A.3
Magann, E.F.4
May, W.L.5
Morri, J.C.6
-
21
-
-
0029832526
-
Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial
-
Mundle W.R., Young D.C. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 88:1996;521-525
-
(1996)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.88
, pp. 521-525
-
-
Mundle, W.R.1
Young, D.C.2
|