Faculty and resident preference for two different forms of lecture evaluation

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 191, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1815-1821

  Imseis, Hytham M ^a   Galvin, Shelley L ^a  

^a Mt Area Health Education Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluations; Lectures; Likert scale; Medical education

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESIDENT; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; TEACHER; TEACHING;

EID: 8544236962     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.068     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education. The ACCME's essential areas, elements, and decision-making criteria. June 2003. Available at: http://accme.org/incoming/17_system98_essential_areas.pdf.
2. R. Gottleib, J. Rogers, and K. Rainey Using curriculum evaluation as a basis for clinical faculty development Coll Stud J 36 2002 279 289
3. J.R. Kerridge, and B.P. Mathews Student rating of courses in HE: further challenges and opportunities Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 23 1998 71 83
4. A.R. Gues, M.A. Roubidoux, C.E. Blane, J.T. Fitzgerald, and R.A. Bowerman Limitations of student evaluations of curriculum Acad Radiol 6 1999 229 235
5. J. Baggott Reaction of lecturers to analysis results of students ratings of their lecture skills J Med Educ 62 1987 491 496
6. M.A. Albanese Challenges in using rater judgements in medical education J Eval Clin Pract 6 2000 305 319
7. S. Sall, D.R. Gromisch, S.H. Rubin, and M.L. Stone Improvement of faculty teaching performance in a department of obstetrics and gynecology by student evaluation Am J Obstet Gynecol 124 1976 217 221