Using Corpora to Analyze Gender

Using Corpora to Analyze Gender

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-228

  Baker, Paul ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85202774138     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (188)

1. Alsop, S., Moreton, E. and Nesi, H. (forthcoming), ‘The Uses of Storytelling in University Engineering Lectures’, ESP across Cultures, 10.
2. Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P. and Somekh, B. (2008), Teachers Investigate Their Work: An Introduction to Action Research across the Professions. London: Routledge.
3. Amaechi, J. (2010), ‘Homophobia Hurts Straight Men Too’, Pink News. www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/02/12/comment-homophobia-hurts-young-straight-mentoo/.12 February 2010.
4. Baker, P. (2005), Public Discourses of Gay Men. London: Routledge.
5. Baker, P. (2006), Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
6. Baker, P. (2010), ‘Will Ms Ever Be as Frequent as Mr? A Corpus-based Comparison of Gendered Terms across Four Diachronic Corpora of British English’, Gender and Language, 4(1): 125–9.
7. Baker, P. (2011), ‘Times May Change, but We’ll Always Have Money: Diachronic Variation in Recent British English’, Journal of English Linguistics, 39(1): 65–88.
8. Baker, P. (2013a forthcoming), ‘Does Britain Need Any More Foreign Doctors? Inter-analyst Consistency and Corpus-assisted (critical) Discourse Analysis’, in M. Charles, N. Groom and S. John (eds), Grammar, Text and Discourse: In Honour of Susan Hunston. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
9. Baker, P. (2013b forthcoming), ‘Considering Context When Analysing Representations of Gender and Sexuality: A Case Study’, in J. Flowerdew (ed.), Discourse in Context(s). London: Bloomsbury.
10. Baker, P, Gabrielatos, G. and McEnery, T. (2013), Discourse Analysis and Media Bias: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Baron, A., Rayson, P. and Archer, D. (2009), ‘Word Frequency and Key Word Statistics in Historical Corpus Linguistics’, in Ahrens, R. and Antor, H. (eds), Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 20(1): 41–67.
12. Baxter, J. (2003), Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Baxter, J. (2010), The Language of Female Leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Baxter, J. (2011), ‘Survival or Success? A Critical Exploration of the Use of “Doublevoiced Discourse” by Women Business Leaders in the UK’, Discourse and Communication, 5(3): 231–45.
15. Berger, J. (1972), Ways of Seeing. London: BBC Books/Pelican.
16. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999), Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
17. Bijeikienė, V. and Utka, A. (2006), ‘Gender-specific Features in Lithuan Parliamentary Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Sociolinguistic and Corpusbased Study’, SKY Journal of Linguistics, 19: 63–99.
18. Brindle, A. (2010), “Just Keep Your Pants on and in the Closet and You’ll Be Fine.” The Corpus Analysis of a White Supremacist Web Forum. Unpublished PhD thesis. Lancaster University.
19. Brooks, A. (1997), Postfeminisms: Feminism, Cultural Theory, and Cultural Forms. London: Routledge.
20. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987), Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2004), ‘Theorizing Identity in Language and Sexuality Research’, Language in Society, 33(4): 469–515.
22. Burr, V. (1995), An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.
23. Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
24. Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. and Moon, R. (2010), ‘“Curvy, Hunky, Kinky”: Using Corpora as Tools for Critical Analysis’, Discourse and Society, 21(2): 99–133.
25. Cameron, D. (1995), Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.
26. Cameron, D. (1998), ‘Gender, Language and Discourse: A Review Essay’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 23(4): 945–73.
27. Cameron, D. (2007), The Myth of Mars and Venus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Cameron, D. and Kulick, D. (2003), Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Charteris-Black and Seale, C. (2009), ‘Men and Emotion Talk: Evidence from the Experience of Illness’, Gender and Language, 3(1): 81–113.
30. Cheng, N., Chandramouli, R. and Subbalakshmi, K. P. (2011), ‘Author Gender Identification from Text’, Digital Investigation, 8: 78–88.
31. Clear, J. (1993), ‘From Firth Principles: Computational Tools for the Study of Collocation’, in M. Baker, G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Philadephia, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 271–92.
32. Coates, J. (ed.) (1998), ‘“Thank God I Am a Woman”: The Construction of Differing Femininities’, in D. Cameron (ed.), The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 295–320.
33. Coates, J. (2003), Men Talk. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34. Cohen, L. and Manion, L. (2000), Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
35. Connell, R. W. (1995), Masculinities. Oxford: Polity Press.
36. Cooper, R. (1982), ‘The Avoidance of Androcentric Generics’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 50: 5–20.
37. Curran, J. R. (2004), From Distributional to Semantic Similarity. Unpublished PhD thesis. Edinburgh University.
38. Deaux, K. and LaFrance, M. (1998), ‘Gender’, in D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds), Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn. New York: Random House, 788–827.
39. Deaux, K. and Major, B. (1987), ‘Putting Gender into Context: An Interactive Model of Gender-related Behavior’, Psychological Review, 94: 369–89.
40. Denzin, N. (2006), Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. 5th edn. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.
41. Dunning, T. (1993), ‘Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise an Coincidence’, Computational Linguistics, 19(1): 61–74.
42. Durrant, P. and Doherty, A. (2010), ‘Are High Frequency Collocations Psychologically Real? Investigating the Thesis of Collocational Priming’, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6(2): 125–55.
43. Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992), ‘Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-based Practice’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 21: 461–90.
44. Eckert, P. (2003), Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Edley, N. and Wetherell, M. (1999), ‘Imagined Futures: Young Men’s Talk about Fatherhood and Domestic Life’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2): 181–4.
46. Evert, S. (2009), ‘Corpora and Collocations’, in A. Lüdeling and M. Kytö (eds), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, 1212–48.
47. Fairclough, N. (2003), Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
48. Ferraresi, A., Zanchetta, E., Baroni, M. and Bernadini, S. (2008), ‘Introducing and Evaluating ukWaC, a Very Large Web-derived Corpus of English’, Proceedings of the WAC4 Workshop at LREC 2008, Marrakech: ELRA. Online document.
49. Fine, C. (2010), Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. New York: W. W. Norton.
50. Fishman P. M. (1977), ‘Interactional Shitwork’, Heresies, 2: 99–101.
51. Flowerdew, J. (ed.) (forthcoming), Discourse in Context. London: Bloomsbury.
52. Foucault, M. (1972), The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
53. Fowler, R. (1991), Language in the News. London: Routledge.
54. Freebody, P. and Baker, C. (1987), ‘The Construction and Operation of Gender in Children’s First School Books’, in A. Pauwels (ed.), Women, Language and Society in Australia and New Zealand. Sydney: Australian Professional Publications, 80–107.
55. Frost, P. (2006), ‘European Hair and Eye Color – A Case of Frequency-dependent Sexual Selection?’, Evolution and Human Behavior, 27: 85–103.
56. Fuertes-Olivera, P. A. (2007), ‘A Corpus-based View of Lexical Gender in Written Business English’, English for Specific Purposes, 26: 219–34.
57. Gill, R. (1993), ‘Justifying Justice: Broadcasters’ Accounts of Inequality in Radio’, in E. Burman and I. Parker (eds), Discourse Analytic Research. London: Routledge, 75–93.
58. Goldberg, P. A., Gottesdiener, M. and Aramson, P. R. (1975), ‘Another Put Down of Women? Perceived Attractiveness as a Function of Support of the Feminist
59. Movement’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32: 113–15.
60. Goodwin, M. H. (1990), He-said-she-said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
61. Gries, S. Th. (2009), Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. New York: Routledge.
62. Griffin, G. (1998), ‘Understanding Heterosexism: The Subtle Continuum of Homophobia’, Women and Language, 21(1): 33–7.
63. Hall, S. (1997), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage in Association with the Open University.
64. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994), An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
65. Harrington, K. (2008), ‘Perpetuating Difference? Corpus Linguistics and the Gendering of Reported Dialogue’, in K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Sauntson and J. Sunderland (eds), Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 85–102.
66. Harrison, M. A. and Shortall, J. C. (2011), ‘Women and Men in Love: Who Really Feels It and Says It First?’, Journal of Social Psychology, 151(6): 727–36.
67. Hasund, I. K. and Stenström, A.B. (1997), ‘Conflict-talk: A Comparison of the Verbal Disputes between Adolescent Females in Two Corpora’, in M. Ljung (ed.), Corpus-based Studies in English. Papers from the 17th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 119–33.
68. Hellinger, M., and Bußmann, H. (2001), ‘Gender across Languages. The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men’, in M. Hellinger and
69. H. Bußmann (eds), Gender across Languages Vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–25.
70. Herdağdelen, A. and Baroni, M. (2011), ‘Stereotypical Gender Actions Can Be Extracted from Web Text’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9): 1741–9.
71. Herek, G. M. (2004), ‘Beyond “Homophobia”: Thinking about Sexual Prejudice and Stigma in the Twenty-first Century’, Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1(2): 6–24.
72. Hochschild, A. and Machung, A. (1989), The Second Shift. New York: Viking Penguin.
73. Hofland, K. and Johansson, S. (1982), Word Frequencies in British and American English. Bergen, Norway: The Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.
74. Holmes, J. (1995), Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
75. Holmes, J. (2001), ‘A Corpus-based View of Gender in New Zealand English’, in M. Hellinger and H. Bußmann (eds), Gender across Languages Vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 115–36.
76. Holmes, J. and Schnurr, S. (2006), ‘Doing Femininity and Work: More than Just Relational Practice’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(1): 31–51.
77. Holmes, J. and Sigley, R. (2001), ‘What’s a Word Like Girl Doing in a Place Like This?’, in A. Smith and P. Peters (eds), New Frontiers of Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 247–63.
78. Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. (2003), “Feminine” Workplaces: Stereotypes and Reality’, in J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Malden, (USA, MA): Blackwell, 573–99.
79. Holmgreen, L.L. (2009), ‘Metaphorically Speaking: Constructions of Gender and Career in the Danish Financial Sector’, Gender and Language, 3(1): 1–32.
80. Hunston, S. (2002), Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Hyde, J. (2005), ‘The Gender Similarities Hypothesis’, American Psychologist, 60(6): 581–92.
82. Iyeiri, Y., Yaguchi, M. and Okabe, H. (2004), ‘To Be Different from or to B Different than in Present-day American English?’, English Today, 79(20/3): 29–33.
83. Jackson, C. (2006), ‘“Wild” Girls? An Exploration of “Ladette” Cultures in Secondary Schools’, Gender and Education, 18(4): 339–60.
84. Johnson, S. (1997), ‘Theorising Language and Masculinity: A Feminist Perspective’, in S. Johnson and U. H. Meinhof (eds), Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell, 47–64.
85. Johnson, S. and Ensslin, A. (2007), ‘“But Her Language Skills Shifted the Family Dynamics Dramatically” Language, Gender and the Construction of Publics in Two British Newspapers’, Gender and Language, 1(2): 229–54.
86. Judge, T. A. and Cable, D. M. (2004), ‘The Effect of Physical Height on Workplace Success and Income: Preliminary Test of a Theoretical Model’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3): 428–41.
87. Juloa, P. (2012), Using the Google Ngram Corpus to Measure Dialectical and Cultural Differences. Paper given at Chicago Colloquium on Digital Humanities and Computer Science, 17–19 November. University of Chicago.
88. Keeling, J. and Fisher, C. (2012), ‘Women’s Early Relational Experiences That Lead to Domestic Violence’, Qualitative Health Research, 22(11): 1559–67.
89. Kilgarriff, A. (2005), ‘Language Is Never Ever Ever Random’, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(2): 263–76.
90. Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P. and Tugwell, D. (2004), ‘The Sketch Engine’, Proceedings of Euralex. Lorient, France, July: 105–16.
91. King, B. (2011), ‘Language, Sexuality and Place: The View from Cyberspace’, Gender and Language, 5(1): 1–30.
92. Kirk, J. M., Kallen, J. L., Lowry, O., Rooney, R. and Mannion, M. (2011), The SPICE-Ireland Corpus: Systems of Pragmatic Annotation for the Spoken Component of ICE-Ireland. Version 1.2.2. Belfast: Queen’s University Belfast and Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
93. Kitzinger, C. (2008), ‘Conversation Analysis: Technical Matters for Gender Research’, in K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Sauntson and J. Sunderland (eds), Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 119–38.
94. Kjellmer, G. (1986), ‘“The Lesser Man”: Observations on the Role of Women in Modern English Writings’, in J. Arts and W. Meijs (eds), Corpus Linguistics II. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 163–76.
95. Koller, V. (2007), ‘“The World’s Local Bank”: Glocalisation as a Strategy in Corporate Branding Discourse’, Social Semiotics, 17(1): 111–30.
96. Koppel, M., Argamon, S. and Shimoni, A. R. (2002), ‘Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(4): 401–12.
97. Lakoff, R. (1975), Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
98. Lazar, M. (ed.) (2005), Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
99. Leech, G. (2003), ‘Modals on the Move: The English Modal Auxiliaries 1961–1992’, in R. Facchinetti, F. R. Palmer and M. Krug (eds), Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 223–40.
100. Iyeiri, Y., Yaguchi, M. and Okabe, H. (2004), ‘To Be Different from or to B Different than in Present-day American English?’, English Today, 79(20/3): 29–33.
101. Jackson, C. (2006), ‘“Wild” Girls? An Exploration of “Ladette” Cultures in Secondary Schools’, Gender and Education, 18(4): 339–60.
102. Johnson, S. (1997), ‘Theorising Language and Masculinity: A Feminist Perspective’, in S. Johnson and U. H. Meinhof (eds), Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell, 47–64.
103. Johnson, S. and Ensslin, A. (2007), ‘“But Her Language Skills Shifted the Family Dynamics Dramatically” Language, Gender and the Construction of Publics in Two British Newspapers’, Gender and Language, 1(2): 229–54.
104. Judge, T. A. and Cable, D. M. (2004), ‘The Effect of Physical Height on Workplace Success and Income: Preliminary Test of a Theoretical Model’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3): 428–41.
105. Juloa, P. (2012), Using the Google Ngram Corpus to Measure Dialectical and Cultural Differences. Paper given at Chicago Colloquium on Digital Humanities and Computer Science, 17–19 November. University of Chicago.
106. Keeling, J. and Fisher, C. (2012), ‘Women’s Early Relational Experiences That Lead to Domestic Violence’, Qualitative Health Research, 22(11): 1559–67.
107. Kilgarriff, A. (2005), ‘Language Is Never Ever Ever Random’, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(2): 263–76.
108. Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P. and Tugwell, D. (2004), ‘The Sketch Engine’, Proceedings of Euralex. Lorient, France, July: 105–16.
109. King, B. (2011), ‘Language, Sexuality and Place: The View from Cyberspace’, Gender and Language, 5(1): 1–30.
110. Kirk, J. M., Kallen, J. L., Lowry, O., Rooney, R. and Mannion, M. (2011), The SPICE-Ireland Corpus: Systems of Pragmatic Annotation for the Spoken
111. Component of ICE-Ireland. Version 1.2.2. Belfast: Queen’s University Belfast and Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
112. Kitzinger, C. (2008), ‘Conversation Analysis: Technical Matters for Gender Research’, in K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Sauntson and J. Sunderland (eds), Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 119–38.
113. Kjellmer, G. (1986), ‘“The Lesser Man”: Observations on the Role of Women in Modern English Writings’, in J. Arts and W. Meijs (eds), Corpus Linguistics II. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 163–76.
114. Koller, V. (2007), ‘“The World’s Local Bank”: Glocalisation as a Strategy in Corporate Branding Discourse’, Social Semiotics, 17(1): 111–30.
115. Koppel, M., Argamon, S. and Shimoni, A. R. (2002), ‘Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(4): 401–12.
116. Lakoff, R. (1975), Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
117. Lazar, M. (ed.) (2005), Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
118. Leech, G. (2003), ‘Modals on the Move: The English Modal Auxiliaries 1961–1992’, in R. Facchinetti, F. R. Palmer and M. Krug (eds), Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 223–40.
119. Leech, G. (2011), ‘The Modals ARE Declining: Reply to Neil Millar’s “Modal Verbs in TIME: Frequency Changes 1923–2006.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14:2 (2009), 191–220’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18: 547–64.
120. Livia, A. and Hall, K. (eds) (1997), Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender and Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
121. Locke, J. (2011), Duels and Duets. Why Men and Women Talk So Differently. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
122. Macalister, J. (2011), ‘Flower-girl and Bugler-boy No More: Changing Gender Representation in Writing for Children’, Corpora, 6(1): 25–44.
123. Manning, C. D. and Schütze, H. (1999), Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
124. Martin, C. L. and Ruble, D. N. (2004), ‘Children’s Search for Gender Cues: Cognitive Perspectives on Gender Development’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2): 67–70.
125. Mauranen, A. (2003), ‘“They’re a Little Bit Different”: Variation in Hedging in Academic Speech’, in K. Aijmer and A.B. Stenström (eds), Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 173–97.
126. Mauranen, A. (2004), ‘“But There’s a Flawed Argument”: Socialization into and through Metadiscourse’, in P. Leistyna and C. Meyer (eds), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Use. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 19–34.
127. McArthur, T. (1981), Longman Lexicon of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
128. McEnery, T. (2006), Swearing in English: Bad language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present. London: Routledge.
129. McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. (2012), Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
130. McEnery, T., Xiao, R. and Tono, Y. (2006), Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.
131. McIlvenny, P. (2002), ‘Critical Reflections on Performativity and the “Un/doing” of Gender and Sexuality’, in P. McIlvenny (ed.), Talking Gender and Sexuality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 111–49.
132. Meehan, A. and Janik, L. (1990), ‘Illusory Correlations and the Maintenance of Sex Role Stereotypes in Children’, Sex Roles, 22: 83–95.
133. Meyerhoff, M. (1987), ‘Language and Sex: Research in New Zealand’, in A. Pauwels (ed.), Women and Language in Australian and New Zealand Society. Sydney: Australian Professional Publications, 32–44.
134. Michel, J. B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Google Books Team, Pickett, J. P., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, D., Norvig, P., Orwant, J., Pinker, S., Nowak M. A. and Aiden, E. L. (2010), ‘Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books’, Science, 331(6014): 176–82.
135. Millar, N. (2009), ‘Modal Verbs in TIME: Frequency Changes 1923–2006’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2): 191–220.
136. Mills, S. (1998), ‘Post-feminist Text Analysis’, Language and Literature, 7(3): 235–53.
137. Motschenbacher, H. (2012), Language, Gender and Sexuality: Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
138. Motschenbacher, H. (forthcoming), ‘Gentlemen Before Ladies? A Corpus-Based Study of Conjunct Order in Personal Binomials’, Journal of English Linguistics.
139. Mullany, L. (2007), Gendered Discourse in Professional Communicatio Basingstoke: Palgrave.
140. Murphy, B. (2009), ‘“She’s a Fucking Ticket”: The Pragmatics of FUCK in Irish English – an Age and Gender Perspective’, Corpora, 4(1): 85–106.
141. Nevalainen, T. (2000), ‘Gender Differences in the Evolution of Standard English: Evidence from the Corpus of Early English Correspondence’, Journal of English Linguistics, 28(1): 38–59.
142. Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handleman, L. D. and Pennebaker, J. W. (2008), ‘Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text Samples’, Discourse Processes, 45: 211–36.
143. Nickerson, R. S. (1998), ‘Confirmation Bias; A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises’, Review of General Psychology, 2(2): 175–220.
144. Oakes, M. P. (1998), Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
145. Oakes, M. and Farrow, M. (2007), ‘Use of the Chi-square Test to Examine Vocabulary Differences in English-language Corpora Representing Seven
146. Different Countries’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22(1): 85–100.
147. Olatunji, B. O. and Sawchuk, C. N. (2005), ‘Disgust: Characteristic Features, Social Manifestations and Clinical Implications’, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(7): 932–62.
148. Olsen, M. (2005), ‘Écriture Féminine: Searching for an Indefinable Practice?’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 20: 147–64.
149. Pang, B. and Lee, L. (2008), ‘Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis’, Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2): 1–135.
150. Pearce, M. (2008), ‘Investigating the Collocational Behaviour of MAN and WOMAN in the BNC Using Sketch Engine’, Corpora, 3(1): 1–29.
151. Petley, J. (2006), ‘Still No Redress from the PCC’, in E. Poole and J. E. Richardson (eds), Muslims and the News Media. London: I.B. Taurus, 53–62.
152. Pilkington, J. (1998), ‘“Don’t Try and Make out That I’m Nice!!” The Different Strategies Women and Men Use When Gossiping’, in J. Coates (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 254–69.
153. Preacher, K. J. (2001), Calculation for the Chi-square Test: An Interactive Calculation Tool for Chi-square Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org.
154. Rayson, P. (2008), ‘From Key Words to Key Semantic Domains’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4): 519–49.
155. Rayson, P., Leech, G. and Hodges, M. (1997), ‘Social Differentiation in the Use of English Vocabulary: Some Analyses of the Conversational Component of the British National Corpus’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2(1): 133–52.
156. Remlinger, K. A. (2005), ‘Negotiating the Classroom Floor: Negotiating Ideologies of Gender and Sexuality’, in M. Lazar (ed.), Feminist Critical
157. Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 114–38.
158. Rich, A. C. (1980), ‘Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence’, Signs, 5(4): 631–60.
159. Richardson, R. (ed.) (2004), Islamophobia: Issues, Challenges and Action. United Kingdom, Trentham Books.
160. Romaine, S. (2001), ‘A Corpus-based View of Gender in British and American English’, in M. Hellinger and H. Bußmann (eds), Gender across Languages Vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 153–75.
161. Runnymede Trust (1997), Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All. London: Runnymede Trust.
162. Rychly, P. and Kilgarriff, A. (2007), ‘An Efficient Algorithm for Building a Distributional Thesaurus’, Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Prague, Czech Republic. Retrieved from www.kilgarriff.co.uk/Publications/2007-RychlyKilg-ACL-thesauruses.pdf.
163. Salama, A. (2011), ‘Ideological Collocation and the Recontexualization of Wahhabi-Saudi Islam Post-9/11: A Synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis’, Discourse and Society, 22(3): 315–42.
164. Schmid, H.J. (2003), ‘Do Men and Women Really Live in Different Cultures? Evidence from the BNC’, in A. Wilson, R. Rayson and T. McEnery (eds), Corpus Linguistics by the Lune. Lódź Studies in Language 8. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 185–221.
165. Sigley, R. and Holmes, J. (2002), ‘Looking at Girls in Corpora of English’, Journal of English Linguistics, 30(2): 138–57.
166. Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J. and Swales, J. M. (2002), The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
167. Stubbs, M. (1995), ‘Collocations and Semantic Profiles: On the Cause of the Trouble with Quantitative Methods’, Functions of Language, 2(1): 1–33.
168. Stubbs, M. (2001), Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. London: Blackwell.
169. Sunderland, J. (2004), Gendered Discourses. London: Palgrave.
170. Swales, J. (2005), Doing MICASE-based Investigations (II): Starting with a Category or Grammar Point. Document at http://micase.elicorpora.info/usingmicase-tips-tutorials Accessed 11 November 2012.
171. Tandon, N. (2008), Feminism: A Paradigm Shift. New Delhi: Atlantic.
172. Tannen, D. (1990), You Just Don’t understand: Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago.
173. Taylor, C. (2013), ‘Searching for Similarity Using Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies’, Corpora, 8(1): 81–114.
174. Thelwall, M. (2008), ‘Fk Yea I Swear: Cursing and Gender in MySpace’, Corpora, 3(1): 83–107.
175. Thimm, C., Koch, S. C. and Schey, S. (2003), ‘Communicating Gendered Professional Identity: Competence, Cooperation, and Conflict in the Workplace’, in J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Malden, (USA, MA): Blackwell Publishing, 528–49.
176. Toginini-Bonelli, E. (2001), Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
177. Troemel-Plotz, S. (1991), ‘Review Essay: Selling the Apolitical’, Discourse and Society, 2(4): 489–502.
178. Tsolmon, B., Kwon, A.-R. and Lee, K.-S. (2012), ‘Extracting Social Events Based on Timeline and Sentiment Analysis in Twitter Corpus’, in G. Bouma, A. Ittoo, E. Métais and H. Wortmann (eds), Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. Proceedings of 17th International Conference on
179. Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems. Groningen, The Netherlands. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7337: 265–70.
180. Van Alphen, I. (1987), ‘Learning from Your Peers: The Acquisition of Genderspecific Speech Styles’, in D. Brower and D. De Haan (eds), Women’s Language, Socialisation and Self-Image. Dordrecht: Foris, 58–75.
181. Van Dijk, T. (2008), Discourse and Context: A Socio-cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
182. Van Leeuwen, T. (1996), ‘The Representation of Social Actors’, in C. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 32–70.
183. Van Leeuwen, T. (2007), ‘Legitimation in Discourse and Communications’, Discourse and Communication, 1(1): 91–112.
184. Warner, M. (ed.) (1993), Fear of a Queer Planet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
185. Weinberg, G. (1973), Society and the Healthy Homosexual. Garden City: New York Anchor Press Doubleday & Co.
186. Williams, R. and Wittig, M. A. (1997), ‘“I’m Not a Feminist but...” Factors Contributing to the Discrepancy between Pro-feminist Orientation and Feminist Social Identity’, Sex Roles, 37(11/12): 885–904.
187. Wilson, A. and Thomas, J. (1997), ‘Semantic Annotation’, in R. Garside, G. Leech and A. McEnery (eds), Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Texts. London: Longman, 55–65.
188. Woods, A., Fletcher, P. and Hughes, A. (1986), Statistics in Language Studies.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.