A Systemic Functional Grammar of French: From Grammar to Discourse

A Systemic Functional Grammar of French: from Grammar to Discourse

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-214

  Caffarel, Alice ^a   Halliday, M A K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85202421045     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (114)

1. Barthes, R. (1967) Degree 2#ro & Elements of Semiology, trans. A. Lavers and C. Smith. London: Jonathan Cape.
2. Bateman, J. A. (1989) ‘Dynamic systemic-functional grammar: a new frontier’, Word, 40 (1-2) 263-86.
3. Battye, A. and Hintze, M.-A. (1992) The French Language Today. London: Routfedge.
4. Beckett, S. (1952) En Attendant Godot. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
5. Behnstedt, P. (1973) Viens-tu? Est-ce que tu viens? Tu viens? Formen und Strukturen des direkten Fragesatzes im Französischen. Tübingen: Narr.
6. Birmant, L. (1991) Le Parc National des Pyrénées Raconté aux Enfants. Tarbes: Nadine Bruneau-Hulin.
7. Blanche-Benveniste, C, Bilger, M., Rouget, C. and van den Eynde, K. (1991) ‘Poupée’, in Le Français Parlé. Paris: Editions du centre national de la recherche scientifique, pp. 259-61.
8. Bottinelli, L., Gerbaldi, M. and Gouguenheim, L. (1984) ‘Décrire puis expliquer l’Univers’, Les Dossiers Spéciaux du Grand Quid Illustré: Etoiles et Galaxies. Paris: Robert Laffont.
9. Buzzati, D. (1968) La Fameuse Invasion des Ours en Sicile. Paris: Editions Stock.
10. Byrne, L. S. R. and Churchill, E. L. (1986) A Comprehensive French Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Caffarel, A. (1992) ‘Interacting between a generalized tense semantics and register-specific semantic tense systems: a bi-stratal exploration of the semantics of French tense’, Language Sciences, 14, (4) 385-418.
12. Caffarel, A. (2004a) ‘A metafunctional profile of French’, in A. Caffarel, J. R. Martin and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (eds) Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 77-137.
13. Caffarel, A. (2004b) ‘The construal of a second-order semiosis in Camus’ LEtranger1, in D. Banks (ed.) Text and Texture. Paris: L’harmattan, pp. 537-70.
14. Caffarel, A., Martin J. R., and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004) Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
15. Camus, A. (1942) L’Etranger. Paris: Gallimard.
16. Combettes, N. (1975) Pour une Linguistique Textuelle. Nancy: Académie de Nancy-Metzxrdp.
17. Comrie, B. (1976) Aspect. London: Cambridge University Press.
18. Coveney, A. (1990) ‘Variation in interrogatives in spoken French: a preliminary report’, in J. N. Green and W. Ayres-Bennett (eds) Variation and Change in French: Essays Presented to Rebecca Posner on the Occasion of her Sixtieth Birthday, New York: Routledge, pp. 116-33.
19. Danes, F. (1964) ‘A three-level approach to syntax’ Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 1, 225-40.
20. Daniélou, A. (1975) ‘Les fous de Dieu’, Les Fous de Dieu: Contes Gangétiques. Paris: Buchet/Chastel, pp. 141-84.
21. De Beauvoir, S. (1945) Les Bouches Inutiles. Paris: Gallimard.
22. de Saussure, F. (1972) Cours de Linguistique Générale, ed. T. de Mauro. Paris: Payot.
23. Delacorta (1985) Vida. Paris: Mazarine.
24. des Forêts, L.-R. (1947) Le Bavard. Paris: Gallimard.
25. Dixon, R. M. W. (1979) ‘Ergativity’, Language, 55, (1) 59-138.
26. Dixon, R. M. W. (1994) Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Eggins, S. (1994) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
28. Fawcett, R. P., van der Mije, A. and van Wissen, A. (1988) ‘Towards a Systemic Flowchart Model for Discourse Structure’, in R. P. Fawcett and D.J. Young (eds) New Developments in Systemic Linguistics, Vol. 2. London: Pinter, pp. 116-43.
29. Firbas,J. (1987) ‘On the delimitation of theme in functional sentence perspective’, in R. Dirven and V. Friend (eds) Functionalism in Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 137-56.
30. Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (1979) Language and Control London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
31. Fries, P. (1981) ‘On the status of Rheme in English: arguments from discourse’, Forum Linguisticum, 6, (1) 1-38.
32. Fuller, G. (1995) ‘Engaging Cultures: Negotiating Discourse in Popular Science’, unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.
33. Gadet, F. (1991) ‘Le parlé coulé dans l’écrit: le traitement du détachement par les grammairiens du XXe siècle’, Langue Française No. 89. Paris: Larousse.
34. Giono, J. (1974) Le Cheval Fou. Paris: Gallimard.
35. Grimshaw, J. (1982) ‘On the lexical representation of Romance reflexive clitics’, in Joan Bresnan (ed.) The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 87-147.
36. Guillaume, G. (1929) Tempset Verbe. Théorie des Aspects, des Modes et des Temps, collection linguistique publiée par la société de linguistique de Paris, tome XXVII. Paris: Champion.
37. Guillaume, G. (1945) LArchitectonique du Temps dans les Langues Classiques. Copenhagen: Munskgaard.
38. Guillaume, G. (1984 [1943]) Langage et Science du Langage (3rd edn). Paris: Librairie A. G. Nizet/Quebec: Presses de l’université Laval.
39. Hagège, C. (1978) ‘Du Thème au Thème en passant par le sujet. Pour un théorie cyclique’, La Linguistique, 14, (2) 3-38.
40. Hagège, C. (1982) La Structure des Langues. Que sais-je. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
41. Hagège, C. (1984) L’Homme de Paroles, folio essais. Paris: Fayard.
42. Halliday, M. A. K. (1966) ‘The concept of rank: a reply’, Journal of Linguistics, 2(1) 110-18.
43. Halliday, M. A. K. (1967) ‘Notes on transitivity and theme in English’, Parts 1 & 2, Journal of Linguistics, 3, 37-81 and 199-244.
44. Halliday, M. A. K. (1968) ‘Notes on transitivity and theme in English’, Part 3, Journal of Linguistics, 4,179-215.
45. Halliday, M. A. K. (1975) Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
46. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
47. Halliday, M. A. K. (1979) ‘Modes of meaning and modes of expression: types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions’, in D.J. Allerton, E. Carney and D. Holdcroft (eds) Function and Context in Linguistics Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-79.
48. Halliday, M. A. K. (1981 [1965]) ‘Types of structure’, in M. A. K. Halliday and J. R. Martin (eds) Readings in Systemic Linguistics. London: Batsford Academic and Educational, pp. 29-41.
49. Halliday, M. A. K. (1984) ‘Language as code and language as behaviour: a systemic-functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of dialogue’, in R. P. Fawcett, M. A. K. Halliday, S. Lamb and A. Makkai (eds) The Semiotics of Language and Culture, Volume 1: Language as Social Semiotic, London: Pinter, pp. 3-35.
50. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985a) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
51. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985b) Spoken and Written Language. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
52. Halliday, M. A. K. (1992) ‘How do you mean?', in M. Davies and L. Ravelli (eds) Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice. London: Pinter, pp. 20-35.
53. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn) London: Edward Arnold.
54. Halliday, M. A. K. (1998) ‘The notion of “context” in language education’, in M. Ghadessy (ed.) Text and Context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 1-24.
55. Halliday, M. A. K. (2002) ‘Computing meanings: some reflections on past experience and present prospects’, in G. Huang and Z. Wang (eds) Discourse and Language Functions. Shanghai: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, pp. 3-25.
56. Halliday, M. A. K. (2002 [1996]) ‘On grammar and grammatics’, in J. Webster (ed.) On Grammar. Vol. 1 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, London and New York: Continuum, pp. 384-417.
57. Halliday, M. A. K. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn), revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Edward Arnold.
58. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
59. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1985) Language, Context and Text: A Social Semiotic Perspective, Geelong: Deakin University Press.
60. Halliday, M. A. K., and Martin, J.R. (1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: The Falmer Press.
61. Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999) Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.
62. Hasan, R. (1985a) ‘Meaning, context and text: fifty years after Malinowski’, in J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves (eds) Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Norwood, NJ:Ablex, pp. 16-50.
63. Hasan, R. (1985b) Linguistics, Language and Verbal Art. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
64. Hasan, R. (1987) ‘The grammarian’s dream: lexis as most delicate grammar’, in M. A. K. Halliday and R. P. Fawcett (eds) New Developments in Systemic Linguistics: Theory a.nd Description. London: Pinter, pp. 184-211.
65. Hasan, R. (1989) ‘Semantic variation and sociolinguistics’, Australian Journal of Linguistics, 221-75.
66. Hjelmslev, L. (1943) Omkring Sprogteoriens Crundloeaeggehe. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
67. Hopper, R J., and Thompson, S. A. (1980) ‘Transitivity in grammar and discourse’, Language, 56, 251-399.
68. Judge, A. and Healey, F. G. (1985) A Reference Grammar of Modern French. London: Edward Arnold.
69. Lambrecht, K. (1988). ‘Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French’, with J. Haiman in Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, in J. Haiman and S. Thompson (eds) Clause Combining in Discourse and Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 135-79.
70. Leeman-Bouix, D. (1994) Les Fautes de Français Existent-elks’? Paris: Seuil.
71. Lukin, A. (2005) ‘Mapping media bias: a multidimensional affair’, Australian Journalism Review, 27 (1) 139-55.
72. Martin,J. R. (1985) ‘Process and Text: two aspects of semiosis’, in J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves (eds) Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol. I: selected theoretical papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 248-74.
73. Martin, J. R. (1991) ‘Intrinsic functionality: implications for contextual theory’, Social Semiotics, 1 (1) 99-162.
74. Martin, J. R. (1992) English Text. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
75. Martin, J. R. (1994) ‘Metalinguistic diversity: the case from case’, in R. Hasan, C. Cloran and D. Butt (eds) Functional Descriptions: Theory in Practice. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 323-74.
76. Martin, J. R. (1995a) ‘Logical meaning, interdependency and the linking particle na/-ngin Tagalog’, Functions of Language, 2 (2) 189-228.
77. Martin, J. R. (1995b) ‘Text and clause: fractal resonance’, in T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Text. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 5-42.
78. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1988) ‘Representational issues in systemic-functional grammar’, in J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves (eds) Systemic-functional Approaches to Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 136-75.
79. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1990) ‘Metafunctional complementarity and resonance in syntagmatic organization’, mimeo, Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.
80. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1991) ‘Language on language: the grammar of semiosis’, Social Semiotics, 1 (2) 69-111.
81. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1992) ‘Interpreting the textual metafunction’, in M. Davies and L. Ravelli (eds) Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice. London: Pinter, pp. 37-81.
82. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1993) ‘Register in the round’, in M. Ghadessy (ed.) Register Analysis: Theory and Practice. London: Pinter, pp. 221-92.
83. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1994) ‘THEME as an enabling resource in ideational ‘knowledge’, in M. Ghadessy (ed.) Thematic Development in English Texts. London: Pinter, pp. 20-54.
84. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995) Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
85. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004) ‘Descriptive motifs and generalizations’, in A. Caffarel, J. R. Martin and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (eds) Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 537-673.
86. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Nesbitt, C. (1996) ‘On the idea of theory-neutral descriptions’, in R. Hasan, C. Cloran and D. Butt (eds) Functional Descriptions: Theory in Practice. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 39-85.
87. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Thompson, S. (1989) ‘The structure of discourse and “subordination”', in J. Haiman and S. Thompson (eds) Clause Combining in Discourse and Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 275-330.
88. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Inui, K. and Teruya, K. (1994) ‘Notes on a systemic-functional interpretation of the grammar of Japanese’, manuscript, Macquarie University and the University of NSW.
89. Michaud, G. and Rimmel, A. (1990) Le Nouveau Guide de France. Paris: Hachette.
90. Morel, M.-A. (1992) ‘L’opposition thème/rhème dans la structuration des dialogues oraux’', Journal ojFrench Language Studies, 2, (1) 61-74.
91. Nesbitt, C. and Plum, G. (1988) ‘Probabilities in a systemic functional grammar: the clause complex in English’, in R. P. Fawcett and D.J. Young (eds) New Developments in Systemic Linguistics, Vol. 2. London: Pinter, pp. 1-38.
92. O’Donnell, M. (1990) ‘A dynamic model of exchange’, Word, 42 (3) 293-327.
93. Painter, C. (2001) Learning through Language in Early Childhood. London: Continuum.
94. Pike, K. L., and Pike, E. G. (1982) Grammatical Analysis (2nd edn). Arlington, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
95. Plank, F. (ed.) (1979) Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Academic Press.
96. Pottier, B. (1992) Théorie et Analyse en Linguistique. Paris: Hachette.
97. Ravelli, L. (1991) ‘A dynamic approach to grammar’, in F. Christie (ed.) Literacy in Social Processes. Papers from the Inaugural Australian Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference held at Deahin University, January 1990. Darwin: Centre for Studies of Language in Education, pp. 159-68.
98. Ravelli, L. (1995) ‘A dynamic perspective: implications for metafunctional interaction and an understanding of rheme’, in R. Hasan and P. H. Fries (eds) On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 187-234.
99. Robbe-Grillet, A. (1957) La Jalousie. Paris: Les Editions De Minuit.
100. Robbe-Grillet, A. (1966) ‘La plage’, trans. B. Wright, in P. Lyon (ed.) Parallel Text: French Short Stories 1. London: Penguin, pp. 11-23.
101. Rothemberg, M. (1989) ‘Quelques moyens syntaxiques de rhématisation et de thématisation en Français’, Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris, 84, 143-61.
102. Rousset, H. (1977) Arts de Corée. Paris: Bibliothèque des Arts.
103. SainhSoline, C. (1972). ‘Le tabac vert’, trans P. Newmark, in S. Lee (ed.) Parallel Text: French Short Stories 2. London: Penguin, pp. 13-47.
104. Sartre, J.-P. (1939) ‘Le mur’, Le mur. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 10-38.
105. Sefton, P. (1995) ‘State-potentials and Social Subjects in Systemic-functional Theory: Towards a Computational Socio-semiotics’, unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.
106. Teruya, K. (2004) ‘Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Japanese’, in A. Caffarel, J. R. Martin and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (eds) Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 185-254.
107. Teruya, K. (forthcoming) Systemic Functional Grammar of Japanese. London and New York: Continuum.
108. Teruya, K., Akerejola, E., Andersen, T., Caffarel, A., Lavid, J., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Petersen, U. H., Patpong, P. and Smedegaard, F. (forthcoming) ‘Typology of MOOD: a text-based and system-based functional view’, in R. Hasan and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (eds) Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, Vol. 2. London: Equinox.
109. Tesnière, L. (1959) Eléments de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
110. Thomas, H. (1966) ‘L’offensive’, trans. K. Thomson, in P. Lyon (ed.) Parallel Text: French Short Stories 1. London: Penguin, pp. 111-33.
111. Ventola, E. (1987) The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Pinter.
112. Vian, B. (1972) ‘Les fourmis’, trans R. Corbett, in S. Lee (ed.) Parallel Text: French Short Stories 2. London: Penguin, pp. 49-75.
113. Wu, C. (2000) ‘Modelling Linguistic Resources: A Systemic Functional Approach’, unpublished PhD thesis, Dept of Linguistics, Macquarie University.
114. Zribi-Hertz, A. (1987) ‘La réflexivité ergative en français moderne’, Le Français Moderne, 23-53.