Key Terms in Pragmatics

Key Terms in Pragmatics

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-251

  Allott, Nicholas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85201032140     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (214)

1. Austin, J. L. (1956). A plea for excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 57, 1-30.
2. Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things With Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Berlin, I. (ed.). (1973). Essays on J. L. Austin. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Fann, K. T. (ed.) (1969). Symposium on J. L. Austin. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Humanities Press.
5. Bach, K. (1994). Conversational impliciture. Mind & Language, 9, 124-162.
6. Bach, K. (1999). The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22(4), 327-366.
7. Bach, K. and Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
8. Chomsky, N. (1992). Explaining language use. Philosophical Topics, 20, 205-231.
9. Kasher, A. (1991). Pragmatics and Chomsky’s research program. In A. Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn (pp. 122-149). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
10. Smith, N. V. (1999). Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Chapman, S. (2005). Paul Grice, Philosopher and Linguist. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Grice, P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66, 377-388. Reprinted in Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press: 213-23.
13. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Syntax & Semantics 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press:22-40.
14. Neale, S. (1992). Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15(5), 509-559.
15. Horn, L. R. (1984). Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. (pp. 11-42). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
16. Horn, L. R. (1989). A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Horn, L. R. (1996). Presupposition and implicature. In S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. (pp. 299-319). Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
21. Searle, J. R. (1968). Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts. The Philosophical Review, 77(4), 405-424.
22. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Searle, J. R., Kiefer, F. and Bierwisch, M. (eds) (1980). Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
24. Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Sperber, D. (1995). How do we communicate? In J. Brockman and K. Matson (eds), How Things Are: A Science Toolkit to the Mind (pp. 191-199). New York: W. Morrow.
26. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.: 1995). Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. R. Horn and G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics. (pp. 607-632). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
28. Ariel, M. (2008). Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
30. Atlas, J. D. (1977). Negation, ambiguity, and presupposition. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(3), 321-336.
31. Atlas, J. D. (1989). Philosophy Without Ambiguity: A Logico-Linguistic Essay.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32. Atlas, J. D. (2004). Presupposition. In L. R. Horn and G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 29-52). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
33. Austin, J. L. (1956). A plea for excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, See: http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0066-7374, 57, 1-30.
34. Austin, J. L. (1961a). Performative utterances. In Austin 1961b: 233-252.
35. Austin, J. L. (1961b). Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
36. Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things With Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37. Austin, J. L. (1966). Three ways of spilling ink. The Philosophical Review, 75(4), 427-440.
38. Bach, K. (1987). On communicative intentions: A reply to Recanati. Mind & Language, 2, 141-154.
39. Bach, K. (1988). Thought and Reference. Oxford: Clarendon.
40. Bach, K. (1994). Conversational impliciture. Mind & Language, 9, 124-162.
41. Bach, K. (1999). The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22(4), 327-366.
42. Bach, K. (2002). Semantic, pragmatic. In J. Keim Campbell, M. O’Rourke and D. Shier (eds), Meaning and Truth (pp. 284-292). New York: Seven Bridges Press.
43. Bach, K. (2004). Pragmatics and the philosophy of language. In L. R. Horn and G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 463-487). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
44. Bach, K. (2006). The top 10 misconceptions about implicature. In B. J. Birner and G. L. Ward (eds), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn (pp. 21-30). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
45. Bach, K. and Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
46. Benz, A., Jäger, G. and van Rooij, R. (eds) (2006). Game Theory and Pragmatics.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Berlin, I. (ed.) (1973). Essays on J. L. Austin. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
48. Birner, B. J. and Ward, G. L. (eds) (2006). Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning:Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R.Horn. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
49. Blakemore, D. (1989). Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
50. Blakemore, D. (1992). Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
51. Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Blakemore, D. (2004). Discourse markers. In L. R. Horn and G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 221-240). Malden, Mass:Blackwell.
53. Blakemore, D. and Carston, R. (2005). The pragmatics of sentential coordination with and. Lingua, 115(4), 569-589.
54. Bloom, P. (2000). How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
55. Breheny, R. (2002). The current state of (radical) pragmatics in the cognitive sciences. Mind & Language, 17(1,2), 169-187.
56. Breheny, R. (2003). On the dynamic turn in the study of meaning and interpretation. In J. Peregrin (ed.), Meaning in the Dynamic Turn (pp. 69-90). Dordrecht: Elsevier.
57. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Carston, R. (1988). Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics. In R. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality (pp. 155-181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Carston, R. (1993). Conjunction, explanation and relevance. Pragmalinguistica, 1, 79-98.
60. Carston, R. (1997). Enrichment and loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed. Linguistische Berichte, 8, 103-127.
61. Carston, R. (1998). Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In Carston and Uchida 1998: 179-236.
62. Carston, R. (2000). The relationship between generative grammar and (relevance-theoretic) pragmatics. Language and Communication, 20, 87-103.
63. Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
64. Carston, R. (2004). Relevance theory and the saying/implicating distinction. In L. R. Horn and G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics. (pp. 633-656). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
65. Carston, R. (2007). Linguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Synthese, 165(3), 321-345.
66. Carston, R. and Uchida, S. (1998). Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
67. Chapman, S. (2005). Paul Grice, Philosopher and Linguist. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.
68. Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner, ‘Verbal Behavior’, 1957. Language, 35, 26-58.
69. Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian Linguistics. Harper & Row.
70. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use.New York: Praeger.
71. Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
72. Chomsky, N. (1991a). Linguistics and adjacent fields: A personal view. In A. Kasher 1991a: 3-25.
73. Chomsky, N. (1991b). Linguistics and cognitive science: Problems and mysteries. In A. Kasher 1991a: 26-55.
74. Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Clark, H. (1977). Bridging. In P. Johnson Laird and J. Wason (eds), Thinking:Readings in Cognitive Science (pp. 411-420). Cambridge University Press.
76. Clark, H. (2002). Conversation, structure of. In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (pp. 820-823). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
77. Clark, H. and Gerrig, R. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 113, 121-126.
78. Cohen, L. J. (1971). Some remarks on Grice’s views about the logical particles of natural language. In Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Pragmatics of Natural Languages (pp. 50-68). New York: Humanities Press.
79. Davis, S. (ed.) (1991). Pragmatics: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80. Donnellan, K. S. (1966). Reference and definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review, 75(3), 281-304.
81. Ducrot, O. (1972). Dire et Ne Pas Dire. Paris: Hermann.
82. Ducrot, O. (1980). Les Échelles Argumentatives. Paris: Minuit.
83. Ducrot, O. (1984). Le Dire et le Dit. Paris: Minuit.
84. Ducrot, O. (1991). Slovene lectures (unpublished manuscript). Available at http://www.igorzagar.net/lectures.pdf. Retrieved 15 July 2009.
85. Fann, K. T. (ed.) (1969). Symposium on J. L. Austin. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Humanities Press.
86. Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
87. Fauconnier, G. (2004). Pragmatics and cognitive linguistics. In L. R. Horn and G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics. (pp. 657-674). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
88. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2008). Rethinking metaphor. In Gibbs 2008:53-66.
89. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.
90. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology.Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
91. Fodor, J. A. (2001). Language, thought and compositionality. Mind & Language, 16(1), 1-15.
92. Garcia-Carpintero, M. (2001). Gricean rational reconstructions and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. Synthèse, 128, 93-131.
93. Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.
94. Gibbs, R. W. (ed.) (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
95. Girotto, V., Kemmelmeier, M., Sperber, D. and van der Henst, J. B. (2001). Inept reasoners or pragmatic virtuosos? Relevance and the deontic selection task. Cognitions, 81(2), B69-76.
96. Grice, P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66, 377-388. Reprinted in Grice 1989b: 213-230.
97. Grice, P. (1968). Utterer’s meaning, sentence meaning and word meaning. Foundations of Language, 4, 225-242. Reprinted in Grice 1989b:117-37.
98. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Syntax & Semantics 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Grice 1989b: 22-40.
99. Grice, P. (1981). Presupposition and conversational implicature. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 183-198). New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Grice 1989b: 269-82.
100. Grice, P. (1982). Meaning revisited. In N. V. Smith (ed.), Mutual Knowledge (pp. 223-243). New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Grice 1989b:283-303.
101. Grice, P. (1989a). Retrospective Epilogue. In Grice 1989b: 339-385.
102. Grice, P. (1989b). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
103. Gutt, E.-A. (1991). Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Oxford:Blackwell.
104. Hare, R. M. (1970). Meaning and speech acts, Philosophical Review. 79, 3-24.
105. Harnish, R. M. (1976). Logical form and implicature. In T. Bever, J. Katz and D. T. Langendoen (eds), An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability. New York: Crowell. (pp. 313-92). Reprinted in Davis 1991: 316-64.
106. Horn, L. R. (1984). Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference:Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications (pp. 11-42). Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press.
107. Horn, L. R. (1988). Pragmatic theory. In F. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey (vol. I) (pp. 113-145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108. Horn, L. R. (1989). A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
109. Horn, L. R. (1996). Presupposition and implicature. In S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (pp. 299-319). Oxford:Blackwell.
110. Horn, L. R. (2004). Implicature. In L. R. Horn and G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics. (pp. 3-28). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
111. Horn, L. R. and Ward, G. L. (eds) (2004). The Handbook of Pragmatics.Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
112. Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
113. Hymes, D. (1987). A theory of verbal irony and a Chinookan pattern of verbal exchange. In J. Verschueren and Bertucelli-Papi, M. (eds), The Pragmatic Perspective (pp. 293-337). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
114. Israel, M. (2004). The pragmatics of polarity. In L. R. Horn and G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 701-723). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
115. Iten, C. (2005). Linguistic Meaning, Truth Conditions and Relevance: The Case of Concessives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
116. Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds) (1999). The Discourse Reader. London:Routledge.
117. Kadmon, N. (2001). Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus. Oxford: Blackwell.
118. Kamp, H. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. H. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Part I (pp. 277-322). Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.
119. Kaplan, D. (1979). On the logic of demonstratives. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1), 81-98.
120. Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In J. Almog, J. Perry, H. K. Wettstein, and D. Kaplan (eds), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481-614). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
121. Karttunen, L. (1973). Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(2), 169-193.
122. Karttunen, L. (1974). Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics, 1(1), 181-194.
123. Karttunen, L. and Peters, S. (1977). Requiem for presupposition. In K. Whistler (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 360-371). Berkeley Linguistics Society.
124. Kasher, A. (ed.) (1991a). The Chomskyan Turn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
125. Kasher, A. (1991b). Pragmatics and Chomsky’s research program. In A. Kasher 1991a: 122-149.
126. Kasher, A. (ed.) (1998). Pragmatics: Critical Concepts. (Vols. I-VI). London:Routledge.
127. Keenan, E. O. (1976). The universality of conversational postulates. Language in Society, 5, 67-80.
128. Kempson, R. (1988). Grammar and conversational principles. In F. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: the Cambridge Survey. (pp. 139-163).
129. Korta, K. and Perry, J. (2006). Pragmatics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatics/
130. Kripke, S. (1977). Speaker’s reference and semantic reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2, 255-276.
131. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
132. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
133. Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
134. Lasersohn, P. (1999). Pragmatic halos. Language, 75(3), 522-551.
135. Leech, G. N. (1980). Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
136. Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
137. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
138. Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
139. Levinson, S. C. (2004). Deixis. In L. R. Horn and G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 97-121). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
140. Levinson, S. C. (2006). On the human ‘interactional engine’. In N. J. Enfield and S. C. Levinson (eds), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction (pp. 39-69). Oxford: Berg.
141. Lewis, D. (1969). Convention. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
142. Martin, R. (1992). Irony and universe of belief. Lingua, 87(1-2), 77-90.
143. Matsui, T. (2000). Bridging and Relevance. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
144. Mey, J. (1993). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
145. Mill, J. S. (1867). An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy and of the Principal Philosophical Questions Discussed in his Writings. Third edition. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
146. Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories.Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
147. Millikan, R. G. (2005). Language: A Biological Model. Oxford University Press.
148. Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago, Ill: The University of Chicago Press.
149. Morris, C. W. (1946). Signs, Language, and Behavior. New York: G. Braziller.
150. Morris, C. W. (1964). Signification and Significance: A Study of the Relations of Signs and Values. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
151. Morris, C. W. (1971). Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague:Mouton.
152. Neale, S. (1990). Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
153. Neale, S. (1992). Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15(5), 509-559.
154. Nicolle, S. and Clark, B. (1999). Experimental pragmatics and what is said:A response to Gibbs and Moise. Cognition, 69(3), 337-354.
155. Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78(2), 165-188.
156. Noveck, I. A. and Sperber, D. (eds) (2004). Experimental Pragmatics.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
157. Noveck, I. A. and Sperber, D. (2007). The why and how of experimental pragmatics:The case of ‘scalar inferences’. In N. Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics. (pp. 184-212). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
158. Politzer, G. (2004). Reasoning, judgement and pragmatics. In Noveck and Sperber 2004: 94-115.
159. Politzer, G. and Macchi, L. (2000). Reasoning and pragmatics. Mind & Society, 1(1), 73-93.
160. Politzer, G. and Noveck, I. A. (1991). Are conjunction rule violations the result of conversational rule violations? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(2), 83-103.
161. Powell, G. (2001). The referential-attributive distinction: A cognitive account. Pragmatics and Cognition, 9(1), 69-98.
162. Recanati, F. (1986). On defining communicative intentions. Mind & Language, 1(3), 213-241.
163. Recanati, F. (1989). The pragmatics of what is said. Mind & Language, 4, 295-329.
164. Recanati, F. (1998). Pragmatics. In E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. (pp. 620-633). Routledge: London.
165. Recanati, F. (2002a). Does linguistic communication rest on inference? Mind & Language, 17, 105-126.
166. Recanati, F. (2002b). Unarticulated constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(3), 299-345.
167. Recanati, F. (2004a). Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
168. Recanati, F. (2004b). Pragmatics and semantics. In L. R. Horn and G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 442-462). Malden, Mass:Blackwell.
169. Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479-493.
170. Sacks, H., Jefferson, G. and Schlegloff, E. (1992). Lectures on Conversation.Oxford: Blackwell.
171. Sbisà, M. (2007). How to read Austin. Pragmatics, 17(3), 461-473.
172. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
173. Schiffer, S. R. (1972). Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
174. Schiffer, S. R. (2005). Russell’s Theory of Definite Descriptions. Mind, 114(456), 1135-1183.
175. Searle, J. R. (1968). Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts. The Philosophical Review, 77(4), 405-424.
176. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
177. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
178. Searle, J. R., Kiefer, F. and Bierwisch, M. (eds) (1980). Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
179. Searle, J. R., Parret, H., and Verschueren, J. (1992). (On) Searle on Conversation.Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
180. Smith, N. V. and Wilson, D. (1979). Modern Linguistics: The Results of Chomsky’s Revolution. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
181. Sperber, D. (1994). Understanding verbal understanding. In J. Khalfa (ed.), What is Intelligence? (pp. 179-198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
182. Sperber, D. (1995). How do we communicate? In J. Brockman and K. Matson (eds), How Things Are: A Science Toolkit to the Mind (pp. 191-199). New York: W. Morrow.
183. Sperber, D. (1997). Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind & Language, 12(1), 67-83.
184. Sperber, D. (2000). Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective (pp. 117-137). New York: Oxford University Press.
185. Sperber, D., Cara, F. and Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57(1), 31-95.
186. Sperber, D. and Girotto, V. (2002). Use or misuse of the selection task? Rejoinder to Fiddick, Cosmides, and Tooby. Cognition, 85(3), 277-290.
187. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Davis 1991: 550-63.
188. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.: 1995). Oxford: Blackwell.
189. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. R. Horn and G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 607-632). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
190. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2005). Pragmatics. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. (pp. 468-501). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
191. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2008). A deflationary account of metaphor. In Gibbs 2008: 84-108.
192. Stalnaker, R. (1970). Pragmatics. Synthese, 22(1), 272-289. Reprinted in Stalnaker 1999: 31-46.
193. Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), 447-457.
194. Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Munitz and P. K. Unger (eds), Semantics and Philosophy (pp. 471-482). New York:New York University Press. Reprinted in Stalnaker 1999: 47-62.
195. Stalnaker, R. (1999). Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
196. Stanley, J. (2000). Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23(4), 391-434.
197. Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59(235), 320-344.
198. Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review, 73(4), 439-460.
199. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. and Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675-91; discussion 691-735.
200. Travis, C. (1981). The True and the False: The Domain of the Pragmatic.Amsterdam: Benjamins.
201. Urmson, J. O. (1952). Parenthetical verbs. Mind, 61, 480-496.
202. van der Henst, J. B., Politzer, G. and Sperber, D. (2002). When is a conclusion worth deriving? A relevance-based analysis of indeterminate relational problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 8(1), 1-20.
203. Verschueren, J. (1978). Pragmatics: An Annotated Bibliography. Amsterdam:J. Benjamins.
204. Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.
205. Verschueren, J. and Östman, J.-O. (eds) (1995-present). Handbook of Pragmatics. (Several vols.) Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
206. Wharton, T. (2002). Paul Grice, saying and meaning. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 207-248.
207. Wilson, D. (1975). Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics. New York: Academic Press.
208. Wilson, D. and Carston, R. (2007). A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics:Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 230-259). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
209. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1988). Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In J. Dancy, J. M. E. Moravcsik and C. C. W. Taylor (eds), Human Agency: Language, Duty, and Value (pp. 77-101). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
210. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87(1/2), 53-76.
211. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua, 90(1), 1-25.
212. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2002). Truthfulness and relevance. Mind, 111(443), 583-632.
213. Wilson, D. and Wharton, T. (2006). Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1559-1579.
214. Žegerac, V. and Clark, B. (1999). Phatic interpretations and phatic communication. Journal of Linguistics, 35, 321-346.