Conceptual integration in Christine de Pizan’s City of Ladies

Linguistic Approaches to Literature

Volumn 1, Issue , 2002, Pages 1-22

  Hamilton, Craig ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85199357376     PISSN: 15693112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/lal.1.03ham     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Aitchison, J. 1997. The Articulate Mammal. London: Routledge. (4th ed.)
2. Blanchard, J. 1992. “Compilation and legitimation in the fifteenth century: Le livre la cité des dames.” In E. J. Richards (ed.), Reinterpreting Christine Pizan. 228–249. Athens, GA: U of Georgia Press.
3. Bruner, J. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Cerquiglini, J. 1993. “L’imaginaire du livre à la fin du Moyen Age: Pratiques lecture, théorie l’écriture.” MLN 108: 680–95.
5. Crisp, P. 2001. “Allegory: Conceptual metaphor in history.” Language and Literature 10: 5–19.
6. Culler, J. 1975. Structuralist Poetics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7. Duby, G. (ed). 1987. Histoire la France: 1348 à 1852. Paris: Larousse.
8. Enders, J. 1994. “The Feminist Mnemonics of Christine Pizan.” MLQ 55: 231–49.
9. Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 1995. “Conceptual integration and formal expression.” Metaphor and Symbol 10(3): 183–203.
11. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 1998. “Conceptual integration networks.” Cognitive Science 22: 133–187.
12. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 1999. “A mechanism for creativity.” Poetics Today 20: 397–418.
13. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.
14. Glucksberg, S. and Keysar, B. 1993. “How metaphors work.” In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. 401–424. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (2nd ed).
15. Grady, J., Oakley, T. and Coulson, S. 1999. “Blending and metaphor.” In R. Gibbs and G. Steen (eds), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, 101–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Greenblatt, S. 1983. “Murdering Peasants: Status, genre, and the representation of rebellion.” Representations 1: 1–29.
17. Herman, D. 1997. “Scripts, sequences, and stories: Elements of a postclassical narratology.” PMLA 112: 1046–59.
18. Jahn, M. 1997. “Frames, preferences, and the reading of third-person narratives: Towards a cognitive narratology.” Poetics Today 18: 441–68.
19. Knapp, S. 1985. Personification and the sublime: From Milton to Coleridge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Laennec, C. M. 1993. “Christine Antygrafe: Authorial ambivalence in the works of Christine Pizan.” In C. Singley and S. E. Sweeney (eds), Anxious Power: Reading, writing, and ambivalence in narrative by women, 35–49. Albany: State University of New York Press.
21. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
22. Leavis, F. R. 1955. “Women in love.” D. H. Lawrence: Novelist, 162–205. London: Chatto and Windus. (1968 reprint).
23. MacKay, D. G. 1986. “Prototypicality among metaphors: On the relative frequency of personification and spatial metaphors in literature written for children versus adults.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 1 (2): 87–107.
24. Margolis, N. 1986. “Christine Pizan: The poetess as historian.” Journal of the History of Ideas 47: 361–75.
25. McLeod, G. 1992. “Poetics and antimisogynist polemics in Christine Pizan’s Le livre la cité des dames.” In Richards E.J. (ed.), Reinterpreting Christine Pizan., 37–47. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
26. Nichols, S. 1993 “Picture, image, and subjectivity in medieval culture.” MLN 108: 617–637.
27. Pizan, C. de. [1405] 1982. The Book of the City of Ladies. (Trans. E. J. Richards. Intr. Maria Warner). New York: Persea.
28. Pizan, C. de. [1405] 1986. Le live de la cité des dames. (Trans. T. Moreau and E. Hicks). Paris: Stock / Moyen Age.
29. Quilligan, M. 1991a. “The allegory of female authority: Christine Pizan and canon formation.” In J. DeJean and N. Miller (eds), Displacements: Women, tradition, literatures in French, 126–143. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30. Quilligan, M. 1991b. The allegory of female authority: Christine de Pizan’s cité des dames. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
31. Richards, E. J. (ed.). 1992. Reinterpreting Christine Pizan. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
32. Schibanoff, S. 1994. “‘Taking the gold out of Egypt:’ The art of reading as a woman.” In R.Evans and L. Johnson (eds), Feminist Readings in Medieval Literature: The wyf of Bath and all her sect, 221–245. New York: Routledge.
33. Schneider, R. 2001. “Towards a cognitive theory of literary character: The dynamics of mental model construction.” Style (Winter): 607–640.
34. Turner, M. 1991. Reading Minds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
35. Turner, M. 1996. The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Tversky, B. “Three types of spatial cognition”. 1999 Lecture, 15 Dec, College de France, Paris, France.
37. Varela, F. 1999. “Quatre phares pour l’avenir des sciences cognitives.” Théorie Littérature Enseignement 17: 7–22.
38. Warner, M. 1982. Introduction to The Book of the City of Ladies, Christine de. Pizan. (Trans. E. J. Richards). New York: Persea.