Presupposition and implication of truth: Linguistic deficits following early brain lesions

Brain and Language

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 376-394

  Eisele, Julie A ^a   Lust, Barbara ^a   Aram, Dorothy M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; BRAIN INJURY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LEFT HEMISPHERE; ONSET AGE; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; RIGHT HEMISPHERE;

EID: 0032519288     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1883     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aram D. M., Eisele J. A. Limits to a left hemisphere explanation for specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 37:1994;824-830.
2. Aram D. M., Ekelman B. L. Unilateral brain lesions in childhood: Performance on the Revised Token Test. Brain and Language. 32:1987;137-158.
3. Bennett, S. Falmagne, R. J. 1977, A study of children's linguistic intuitions about factive presuppositions.
4. Bihrle A., Brownell H., Powelson J., Gardner H. Comprehension of humorous and non-humorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Cognition. 5:1986;399-411.
5. Brownell H. H., Potter H. H., Bihrle A. M., Gardner H. Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language. 27:1986;310-321.
6. Carrell P. L. Inferencing in ESL: Presuppositions and implications of factive and implicative predicates. Language Learning. 34:1984;1-21.
7. Chomsky N. Lectures in Government and Binding. 1981;Foris, Dordrecht.
8. Dennis M. Capacity and strategy for syntactic comprehension after left or right hemidecortication. Brain and Language. 10:1980;287-317.
9. Dennis M., Whitaker H. A. Linguistic superiority of the left over the right hemisphere. Brain and Language. 3:1976;404-433.
10. Eisele, J. A. 1992, The role of negation in determining presuppositions and implications of truth: A study of early hemisphere damage.
11. Eisele J. A., Aram D. M. Differential effects of early hemisphere damage on lexical comprehension and production. Aphasiology. 7:1993a;513-523.
12. Eisele J. A., Aram D. M. Comprehension and imitation of syntax following early hemisphere damage. Brain and Language. 46:1993b;212-231.
13. Eisele J. A., Aram D. M. Lexical and grammatical development in children with early hemisphere damage: A cross-sectional view from birth to adolescence. Handbook of child language. 1995;Blackwell Publishers, Oxford. p. 664-689.
14. Foldi N. S. Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language. 31:1987;88-108.
15. Harris R. J. Children's comprehension of complex sentences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 19:1975;420-433.
16. Hollingshead, A. B. 1975, Four factor index of social status.
17. Hornby P. A. Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 13:1974;530-538.
18. Hopmann M. R., Maratsos M. P. A developmental study of factivity and negation in complex sentences. Journal of Child Language. 5:1978;295-309.
19. Just M. A., Clark H. H. Drawing inferences from the presuppositions and implications of affirmative and negative sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 12:1973;21-31.
20. Karttunen L. Implicatives. Language. 47:1971;340-358.
21. Kelleher, T. R. 1975, Young children's understanding of presupposition and implication.
22. Kiparsky P., Kiparsky C. Fact. Bierwisch M., Heidolph K. Progress in linguistics. 1970;Mouton, The Hague.
23. Natsopoulos D. Processing implications and presuppositions by schoolchildren and adults: A developmental cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 16:1987;133-164.
24. Phinney M. Children's interpretation of negation in complex sentences. Tavakolian S. L. Language acquisition and linguistic theory. 1981;MIT Press, Cambridge.
25. Scoville R. P., Gordon A. M. Children's understanding of factive presuppositions: An experiment and a review. Journal of Child Language. 7:1980;381-399.
26. Singer M. S. A developmental study of children's comprehension of negation in complex sentences involving clauses. Journal of Genetic Psychology. 148:1988;189-196.
27. Smith N. V., Wilson D. Modern Linguistics. 1979;Penguin Books.
28. Vosniadou S. Drawing inferences from semantically positive and negative implicative predicates. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 11:1982;77-93.
29. Wetzel W. F., Molfese D. L. The processing of presuppositional information contained in sentences: Electrophysiological correlates. Brain and Language. 42:1992;286-307.
30. Winner E., Gardner H. The comprehension of metaphors in brain-damaged patients. Brain. 100:1977;719-727.