Presuppositions, Truth Values, and Expressing Propositions

Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 349-396

  Glanzberg, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85195346993     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Adams, E. W. (1975). The Logic of Conditionals (Dordrecht: Reidel).
2. Atlas, D. J., and S. C. Levinson (1981). ‘It-Clefts, Informativeness, and Logical Form: Radical Pragmatics (Revised Standard Version)’, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics (New York: Academic Press), 1-61.
3. Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words, ed. J. O. Urmson and M. Sbisà (2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
4. Ayer, A. J. (1946). Language, Truth and Logic (2nd edn. London: Victor Gollancz).
5. Bach, K. (1994). ‘Conversational Impliciture’, Mind and Language, 9: 124-62.
6. Beaver, D. I. (1997). ‘Presupposition’, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 939-1008.
7. Beaver, D. I.(2001). Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics (Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications).
8. Carlson, L. (1983). Dialogue Games (Dordrecht: Reidel).
9. Carston, R. (1988). ‘Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics’, in R. M. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 155-81.
10. Carston, R.(2004). ‘Explicature and Semantics’, in S. Davis and B. Gillon (eds.), Semantics: A Reader (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
11. Chierchia, G. and S. McConnell-Ginet (1990). Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics (Cambridge: MIT Press).
12. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge: MIT Press).
13. Davis, S. (1991). Pragmatics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
14. Delin, J. (1992). ‘Properties of It-Cleft Presupposition’, Journal of Semantics, 9: 289-306.
15. Eijck, J. van (1993). ‘The Dynamics of Descriptions’, Journal of Semantics, 10: 239-67.
16. Eijck, J. van(1994). ‘Presupposition Failure: A Comedy of Errors’, Formal Aspects of Computing, 6A: 766-87.
17. Fintel, K. Von (2004). ‘Would You Believe It? The King of France Is Back!’, in A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
18. Frege, G. (1892). ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 25-50. References are to the translation as ‘On Sense and Meaning’ by M. Black, reprinted in Frege (1984).
19. Frege, G. (1984). Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, ed. B. McGuinness (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
20. Glanzberg, M. (2001). ‘The Liar in Context’, Philosophical Studies, 103: 217-51.
21. Glanzberg, M.(2002). ‘Context and Discourse’, Mind and Language, 17: 333-75.
22. Glanzberg, M.(2004). ‘Against Truth-Value Gaps’, in J. C. Beall (ed.), Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 151-94.
23. Glanzberg, M.and S. Siegel (forthcoming). ‘Presupposition and Policing in Complex Demonstratives’, Noûs.
24. Grice, P. (1969). ‘Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions’, Philosophical Review, 78: 147-77. Reprinted in Grice (1989).
25. Grice, P.(1975). ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, vol. iii of Syntax and Semantics (New York: Academic Press), 41-58. Reprinted in Grice (1989).
26. Grice, P.(1989). Studies in the Way of Words (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
27. Groenendijk, J., and M. Stokhof (1991). ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 14: 39-100.
28. Groenendijk, J., and M. StokhofM. Stokhof, and F. Veltman (1996). ‘Coreference and Modality’, in S. Lappin (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (Oxford: Blackwell), 179-213.
29. Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory (2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell).
30. Heim, I. (1982). ‘The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published New York, Gar-land, 1989.
31. Heim, I.(1983). ‘On the Projection Problem for Presupposition’, Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 2: 114-25. Reprinted in Davis (1991).
32. Heim, I.(1992). ‘Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs’, Journal of Semantics, 9: 183-221.
33. Heim, I.and A. Kratzer (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar (Oxford: Blackwell).
34. Herburger, E. (2000). What Counts: Focus and Quantification (Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press).
35. Horn, L. R. (1981). ‘Exhaustiveness and the Semantics of Clefts’, NELS 11: 125-42.
36. Horn, L. R.(1989). A Natural History of Negation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
37. Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
38. Kadmon, N. (2001). Formal Pragmatics (Oxford: Blackwell).
39. Kamp, H. (1984). ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Truth, Interpretation, and Information (Dordrecht: Foris), 1-41.
40. Karttunen, L. (1974). ‘Presupposition and Linguistic Context’, Theoretical Linguistics, 1: 181-94. Reprinted in Davis (1991).
41. Karttunen, L.and S. Peters (1979). ‘Conventional Implicature’, in C.-K. Oh and D. A. Dinneen (eds.), Presupposition, vol. xi of Syntax and Semantics (New York: Academic Press), 1-56.
42. King, J. C. (2001). Complex Demonstratives (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
43. Kiss, K. É. (1998). ‘Identificational Focus versus Information Focus’, Language, 74: 245-73.
44. Krahmer, E. (1998). Presupposition and Anaphora (Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications).
45. Kuppevelt, J. van (1995). ‘Discourse Structure, Topicality and Questioning’, Journal of Linguistics, 31: 109-47.
46. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
47. Lewis, D. (1979). ‘Scorekeeping in a Language Game’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 339-59. Reprinted in Lewis (1983).
48. Lewis, D.(1983). Philosophical Papers, i (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
49. Prince, E. F. (1978). ‘A Comparison of Wh-Clefts and It-Clefts in Discourse’, Language, 54: 883-906.
50. Recanati, F. (1993). Direct Reference (Oxford: Blackwell).
51. Roberts, C. (1996). ‘Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics’, Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 4: 91-136.
52. Rooth, M. (1985). ‘Association with Focus’, Ph. D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
53. Rooth, M.(1992). ‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation’, Natural Language Semantics, 1: 75-116.
54. Rooth, M.(1999). ‘Association with Focus or Association with Presupposition?’, in P. Bosch and R. A. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 232-44.
55. Sandt, R. A. van der (1988). Context and Presupposition (London: Croom Helm).
56. Sandt, R. A. van der(1992). ‘Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution’, Journal of Semantics, 9: 333-77.
57. Sandt, R. A. van derand B. Geurts (2001). ‘Too’, in Proceedings of the 13th Amsterdam Colloquium (Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam).
58. Schegloff, E. A., G. Jefferson, and H. Sacks (1977). ‘The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation’, Language, 53: 361-82.
59. Schiffer, S. (1972). Meaning (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
60. Schiffrin, D. (1985). ‘Conversational Coherence: The Role of Well’, Language, 61: 640-67.
61. Simons, M. (2001a). ‘Disjunction and Alternatives’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 24: 597-619.
62. Simons, M.(2001b). ‘On the Conversational Basis of Some Presuppositions’, Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 11: 431-48.
63. Simons, M. (n.d.), ‘Why Some Presuppositions Are Conversational Implicatures’, unpublished.
64. Soames, S. (1989). ‘Presupposition’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Hand-book of Philosophical Logic (Dordrecht: Kluwer), iv. 553-616.
65. Sperber, D., and D. Wilson (1986). Relevance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
66. Stalnaker, R. C. (1973). ‘Presuppositions’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2: 447-57.
67. Stalnaker, R. C.(1974). ‘Pragmatic Presuppositions’, in M. K. Munitz and P. K. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy (New York: New York University Press), 197-213. Reprinted in Stalnaker (1999).
68. Stalnaker, R. C.(1978). ‘Assertion’, in P. Cole (ed.), Pragmatics, vol. ix of Syntax and Semantics (New York: Academic Press), 315-22. Reprinted in Stalnaker (1999).
69. Stalnaker, R. C.(1998). ‘On the Representation of Context’, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 7: 3-19. Reprinted in Stalnaker (1999).
70. Stalnaker, R. C.(1999). Context and Content (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
71. Strawson, P. F. (1950). ‘On Referring’, Mind, 59: 320-344. Reprinted in Strawson (1971).
72. Strawson, P. F.(1952). Introduction to Logical Theory (London: Methuen).
73. Strawson, P. F.(1964). ‘Identifying Reference and Truth-Values’, Theoria, 30: 96-118. Reprinted in Strawson (1971).
74. Strawson, P. F.(1971). Logico-Linguistic Papers (London: Methuen).
75. Zeevat, H. (1992). ‘Presupposition and Accommodation in Update Semantics’, Journal of Semantics 9: 379-412.