Context and discourse

Mind and Language

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 333-375

  Glanzberg, Michael ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036753874     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00204     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Asher, N. 1993: Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Barwise, J. and Perry, J. 1983: Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Bolinger, D. 1972: Accent is predictable (if you're a mind-reader). Language, 48, 633-644.
4. Brown, G. and Yule, G. 1983: Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Büring, D. 1999: Topic. In P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 142-165.
6. Carberry, S. 1990: Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7. Chierchia, G. and McConnell-Ginet, S. 1990: Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. Chomsky, N. 1971: Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In D.D. Steinberg and L.A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183-216.
9. Cresswell, M.J. 1973: Logics and Languages. London: Methuen.
10. Dahl, Ö. 1974: Topic-comment structure revisited. In Ö. Dahl (ed.), Topic and Comment. Hamburg: Helmut Buske, 1-24.
11. Daneš, F. 1968: Some thoughts on the semantic structure of the sentence. Lingua, 21, 55-69.
12. Van Dijk, T.A. 1977: Text and Context. London: Longman.
13. Van Dijk, T.A. and Kintsch, W. 1983: Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
14. Dretske, F. 1972: Contrastive statements. Philosophical Review, 81, 411-437.
15. Van Eijck, J. and Kamp, H. 1997: Representing discourse in context. In J. Van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 179-237.
16. von Fintel, K. 1994: Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
17. von Fintel, K. forthcoming Would you believe it? The King of France is back! In A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Firbas, J. 1964: On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 1, 267-280.
19. Flaubert, G. 1877; 1978: The legend of Saint Julian the Hospitaller. In R.V. Cassill (ed.), The Norton Anthology of Short Fiction. 3rd edn. New York: Norton, 560-581. Translated from the French original of 1877.
20. Flaubert, G. 1856; 1994: Madame Bovars. Ware: Wordsworth. Translated from the French original of 1856.
21. García Márquez, G. 1967; 1970: One Hundred Years of Solutide. New York: Harper and Row. Translated by G. Rabassa from the Spanish original of 1967.
22. Giora, R. 1985: Notes towards a theory, of text coherence. Poetics Today, 6, 699-715.
23. Givón, T. 1983: Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-41.
24. Grice, P. 1969: Utterer's meaning and intentions. Philosophical Review, 78, 147-177. Reprinted in Grice (1989).
25. Grice, P. 1989: Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
26. Grosz, B.J., Joshi, A.K., and Weinstein, S. 1995: Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21, 203-225.
27. Grosz, B.J. and Sidner, C.L. 1986: Attention, intentions, and the structure of dis-course. Computational Linguistics, 12, 175-204.
28. Gundel, J.K. 1974: The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. Published by Garland, New York, 1988.
29. Gundel, J.K. 1985: Shared knowledge and topicality. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 83-107.
30. Hajičová, E., Partee, B.H., and Sgall, P. 1988: Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
31. Halliday, M.A.K. 1967: Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part 2). Journal of Linguistics, 3, 199-244.
32. Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. 1976: Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
33. Heim, I. 1982: The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published by Garland, New York, 1989.
34. Hobbs, J.R. 1985: On the coherence and structure of discourse. Tech. Rep. CSLI-85-37, CSLI, Stanford.
35. Jackendoff, R.S. 1972: Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
36. Kamp, H. 1984: A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Truth, Interpretation, and Information. Dordrecht: Foris, 1-41.
37. Kaplan, D. 1989a: Afterthoughts. In J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 565-614.
38. Kaplan, D. 1989b: Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 481-563. First publication of a widely circulated manuscript dated 1977.
39. Keenan, E.O. and Schieffelin, B. 1976a: Foregrounding referents: A reconsideration of left dislocation in discourse. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2, 240-257.
40. Keenan, E.O. and Schieffelin, B. 1976b: Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topics in the conversations of children and adults. In N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 335-384.
41. Krifka, M. 1993: Focus and presupposition in dynamic interpretation. Journal of Semantics, 10, 269-300.
42. Kuno, S. 1972: Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry, 3, 269-320.
43. Van Kuppevelt, J. 1995: Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics, 31, 109-147.
44. Ladd, D.R. 1996: Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Lasersohn, P. 1993: Existence presuppositions and background knowledge. Journal of Semantics, 10, 113-122.
46. Levinson, S.C. 1983: Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Lewis, D. 1970: General semantics. Synthese, 22, 18-67. Reprinted in Lewis (1983).
48. Lewis, D. 1979a: Attitudes de dicto and de se. Philosophical Review, 88, 513-543. Reprinted in Lewis (1983).
49. Lewis, D. 1979b: Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 339-359. Reprinted in Lewis (1983).
50. Lewis, D. 1980: Index, context, and content. In S. Kanger and S. Öhman (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel, 79-100. Reprinted in Lewis (1998).
51. Lewis, D. 1983: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Lewis, D. 1998: Papers in Philosophical Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Mann, W.C. and Thompson, S.A. 1988: Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243-281.
54. McNally, L. 1998: On recent formal analyses of topic. In J. Ginzburg, Z. Khasidashvili, C. Vogel, J.-J. Lévy, and E. Vallduví (eds.), The Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Lanouage and Computation. Stanford: CSLI, 147-160.
55. Montague, R. 1968: Pragmatics. In R. Klibansky (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy: A Survey. Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 102-122. Reprinted in Montague (1974).
56. Montague, R. 1974: Formal Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press. Edited by R. Thomason.
57. Parker, W.O. and Smith, H.K. 1979: Scene Design and Stage Lighting. 4th edn. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
58. Pierrehumbert, J. and Hirschberg, J. 1990: The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P.R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M.E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication. Cambridge: MIT Press, 271-311.
59. Polanyi, L. 1988: A formal model of the structure of discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 601-638.
60. Portner, P. and Yabushita, K. 1998: The semantics and pragmatics of topic phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, 117-157.
61. Prince, E.F. 1981: Topicalization, focus-movement, and yiddish-movement: A pragmatic differentiation. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 7, 249-264.
62. Prince, E.F. 1997: On the functions of left-dislocation in English discourse. In A. Kamio (ed.), Directions in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 117-144.
63. Reinhart, T. 1980: Conditions for text coherence. Poetics Today, 1, 161-180.
64. Reinhart, T. 1981: Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27, 53-94.
65. Roberts, C. 1996: Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 49, 91-136.
66. Rooth, M. 1985: Association with Focus. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
67. Rooth, M. 1992: A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75-116.
68. Rostand, E. 1897; 1951: Cyrano de Bergerac. New York: Bantam. Translated by B. Hooker from the French original of 1897.
69. Rumelhart, D.E. 1975: Notes on a schema for stories. In D.G. Bobrow and A. Collins (eds.), Representation and Understanding. New York: Academic Press, 211-236.
70. Schlobinski, P. and Schütze-Coburn, S. 1992: On the topic of topic and topic continuity. Linguistics, 30, 89-121.
71. Scholes, P.A. 1955: The Oxford Companion to Music. 9th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Schwarzschild, R. 1999: How specific is an utterance? Unpublished handout.
73. Stalnaker, R.C. 1974: Pragmatic presuppositions. In M.K. Munitz and P.K. Unger (eds.) Semantics and Philosophy New York: New York University Press, Reprinted in Stalnaker (1999).
74. Stalnaker, R.C. 1978: Assertion. In P. Cole (ed.), Pragmatics, vol. 9 of Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press, 315-322. Reprinted in Stalnaker (1999).
75. Stalnaker, R.C. 1998: On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language, and Infomation, 7, 3-19. Reprinted in Stalnaker (1999).
76. Stalnaker, R.C. 1999: Context and Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Stanley, J. and Szabó, Z.G. 2000: On quantifier domain restriction. Mind Language, 15, 219-261.
78. von Stechow, A. 1991: Current issues in the theory of focus. In A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter, 804-825.
79. Steedman, M. 2000: The Syntactic Process. Cambridge: MIT Press.
80. Strawson, P.F. 1950: On refemng. Mind 59, 320-344. Reprinted in Strawson (1971).
81. Strawson, P.F. 1964: Identifying reference and truth-values. Theoria, 30, 96-118. Reprinted in Strawson (1971).
82. Strawson, P.F. 1971: Logico-Linguistic Papers. London: Methuen.
83. Thorndyke, P.W. 1977: Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77-110.
84. Vallduví, E. 1990: The Informational Component. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Published by Garland, New York, 1992.
85. Vallduví, E. and Zacharski, R. 1984: Accenting phenomena, association with focus, and the recursiveness of focus-ground. Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium, 9, 683-702.
86. Ward, G.L. 1985: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Preposing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Published by Garland, New York, 1988.
87. Ward, G.L. and Prince, E.F. 1991: On the topicalization of indefinite NPs. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 167-177.