Desert and Justice

Desert and Justice

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 1-269

  Olsaretti, Serena ^a,b  

^a St John s College and University   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85195346810     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (118)

1. Adams, R., ‘Involuntary Sins’, Philosophical Review, 84 (1985), 3–31.
2. Adler, J., ‘Luckless Desert is Different Desert’, Mind, 96 (1987), 247–9.
3. Ake, C., ‘Justice as Equality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4 (1975), 69–89.
4. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, tr. D. Ross (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980).
5. Arneson, R., ‘Egalitarianism and the Undeserving Poor’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 5 (1997), 327–50.
6. Arneson, R. ‘Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism’, Ethics, 110 (2000), 339–49.
7. Arneson, R. ‘Luck and Equality’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement, 75 (2001), 73–90.
8. Austin, J. L., Sense and Sensibilia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).
9. Barry, B., Political Argument (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965).
10. Bedau, H. A. (ed.), The Death Penalty in America, 3rd edn. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982).
11. Bennett, J., ‘Accountability’, in Z. van Straaten (ed.), Philosophical Subjects (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980), 14–47.
12. Bok, H., Freedom and Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).
13. Carens, J., ‘Compensatory Justice and Social Institutions’, Economics and Philosophy, 1 (1985), 36–67.
14. Cohen, G. A., ‘On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice’, Ethics, 99 (1989), 906–42.
15. Cohen, G. A. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
16. Cummiskey, D., ‘Desert and Entitlement: A Rawlsian Consequentialist Account’, Analysis, 47 (1987), 15–19.
17. Cupit, G., Justice as Fittingness (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
18. Dick, J., ‘How to Justify a Distribution of Earnings’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4 (1975), 248–72.
19. Dolinko, D., ‘How to Criticize the Death Penalty’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77 (1986), 546–601.
20. Dolinko, D ‘Justice in the Age of Sentencing Guidelines’, Ethics, 110 (2000), 563–85.
21. Dworkin, R., ‘What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10 (1981), 283–345.
22. Dworkin, R Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press, 2000).
23. Farber, L. H., The Ways of the Will (New York: Harper & Row, 1966).
24. Feinberg, J., ‘Justice and Personal Desert’, in J. Feinberg, Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970), 55–94.
25. Feinberg, J. ‘The Expressive Function of Punishment’, in J. Feinberg, Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970), 95–118.
26. Feinberg, J., Social Philosophy (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973).
27. Feinberg, J. ‘Noncomparative Justice’, Philosophical Review, 83 (1974), 297–338; reprinted in J. Feinberg, Rights, Justice, and the Bounds of Liberty (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980), 265–306.
28. Feldman, F., ‘Adjusting Utility for Justice: A Consequentialist Reply to the Objections from Justice’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55 (1995), 567–85; reprinted in F. Feldman, Utilitarianism, Hedonism, and Desert: Essays in Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 151–74.
29. Feldman, F. ‘On the Intrinsic Value of Pleasures’, in F. Feldman, Utilitarianism, Hedonism, and Desert: Essays in Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 127–47.
30. Feldman, F. Utilitarianism, Hedonism, and Desert: Essays in Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
31. Feldman, F. ‘Desert: Reconsideration of Some Received Wisdom’, Mind, 104 (1995), 63–77; reprinted in L. P. Pojman and O. McLeod (eds.), What do we Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 140–8.
32. Feldman, F. ‘The Good Life: A Defense of Attitudinal Hedonism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64 (2002).
33. Fischer, J. M., and Ravizza, M., Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
34. Fleurbaey, M., ‘On Fair Compensation’, Theory and Decision, 36 (1994), 277–307.
35. Fleurbaey, M. ‘Equal Opportunity Egalitarianism or Equal Social Outcome’, Economics and Philosophy, 11 (1995), 25–55.
36. Frank, R. H., Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).
37. Goodin, R., ‘Negating Positive Desert Claims’, Political Theory, 13 (1985), 575–98.
38. Hayek, F. A., Law, Legislation and Liberty, ii. The Mirage of Social Justice (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976).
39. Hoffman, J., ‘A New Theory of Comparative and Noncomparative Justice’, Philosophical Studies, 70 (1993), 165–83.
40. Hume, D., Enquiries, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975).
41. Hurka, T., ‘The Common Structure of Virtue and Desert’, Ethics, 112 (2001), 6–31.
42. Hurley, S., ‘Justice without Constitutive Luck’, Ethics, in A. Phillips Griffiths (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 35 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 179–212.
43. Hurley, S. ‘Luck and Equality’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement 75 (2001), 51–72.
44. Husak, D., ‘Holistic Retributivism’, California Law Review, 88 (2000), 991–1000.
45. Kagan, S., ‘The Additive Fallacy’, Ethics, 99 (1988), 5–31.
46. Kagan, S. ‘Equality and Desert’, in L. P. Pojman and O. McLeod (eds.), What do we Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 298–314.
47. Kleinig, J., ‘The Concept of Desert’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 8 (1971), 71–8.
48. Kukathas, C., and Pettit, P., Rawls: A Theory of Justice and its Critics (Cambridge: Polity, 1990).
49. Lamont, J., ‘The Concept of Desert in Distributive Justice’, Philosophical Quarterly, 44 (1994), 45–64.
50. Lamont, J. ‘Problems for Effort-Based Distribution Principles’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12 (1995), 215–29.
51. Lamont, J. ‘Incentive Income, Deserved Income and Economic Rents’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 5 (1997), 26–46.
52. Levine, A., ‘Rewarding Effort’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 7 (1999), 404–18.
53. MacIntyre, A., After Virtue (London: Duckworth, 1981).
54. Marmor, A., ‘The Intrinsic Value of Economic Equality’, in L. H. Meyer, S. Paulson, and T. Pogge (eds.), Rights, Culture and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
55. Marshall, G., Swift, A., Routh, D., and Burgoyne, C., ‘What is and What ought to be: Popular Beliefs about Distributive Justice in Thirteen Countries’, European Sociological Review, 15 (1999), 349–67.
56. Mason, A. (ed.), Ideals of Equality (Oxford and Malden: Blackwell, 1998).
57. Matson, W., ‘What Rawls Calls Justice’, Occasional Review (Autumn 1978), 45–55.
58. McLeod, O., ‘Desert and Institutions’, in L. P. Pojman and O. McLeod (eds.), What do we Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 186–95.
59. McLeod, O. ‘Desert and Wages’, in L. P. Pojman and O. McLeod (eds.), What do we Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 271–82.
60. Mill, J. S., Utilitarianism, in Utilitarianism and Other Writings, ed. M. Warnock (Glasgow: Collins, 1962).
61. Miller, D., Social Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976).
62. Miller, D. Market, State and Community. Theoretical Foundations of Market Socialism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).
63. Miller, D. ‘Distributive Justice: What the People Think’, Ethics, 102 (1992), 555–93.
64. Miller, D. Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press, 1999).
65. Milne, H., ‘Desert, Effort and Equality’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 3 (1986), 235–43.
66. Montague, P., ‘Comparative and Noncomparative Justice’, Philosophical Quarterly, 30 (1980), 131–40.
67. Nagel, T., Equality and Partiality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).
68. Narveson, J., ‘Deserving Profits’, in R. Cowan and M. J. Rizzo (eds.), Profits and Morality (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1995), 48–87.
69. Nielson, K., ‘Radical Welfare Egalitarianism’, in K. Nielson, Equality and Liberty: A Defense of Radical Egalitarianism (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld, 1985); reprinted in L. P. Pojman and R. Westmoreland, Equality: Selected Readings (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 204–17.
70. Nozick, R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).
71. Olsaretti, S., ‘Desert and Luck’, in D. Bell and A. de Shalit (eds.), Forms of Justice (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002).
72. Olsaretti, S., ‘Unmasking Equality? Kagan on Equality and Desert’, Utilitas, 14 (2002), 387–400.
73. Parfit, D., Equality or Priority?, The Lindley Lecture (Lawrence, Kan.: University of Kansas Press, 1995).
74. Parfit, D. ‘Equality and Priority’, in A. Mason (ed.), Ideals of Equality (Oxford and Malden: Blackwell, 1998), 1–20.
75. Pereboom, D., Living without Free Will (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
76. Pojman, L. P., ‘Does Equality Trump Desert?’, in L. P. Pojman and O. McLeod (eds.), What do we Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 283–97.
77. Pojman, L. P. and McLeod, O. (eds.), What do we Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
78. Pojman, L. P. and Westmoreland, R. (eds.), Equality: Selected Readings (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).
79. Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, revised edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
80. Richards, N., ‘Luck and Desert’, Mind, 95 (1986), 198–209.
81. Roemer, J., ‘A Pragmatic Theory of Responsibility for the Egalitarian Planner’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22 (1993), 146–66.
82. Roemer, J. Theories of Distributive Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996).
83. Roemer, J. Equality of Opportunity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998).
84. Ross, M., and Miller, D. T. (eds.), The Justice Motive in Everyday Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
85. Ross, W. D., The Right and the Good (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930).
86. Sadurski, W., Giving Desert its Due: Social Justice and Legal Theory (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1985).
87. Sandel, M., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).
88. Scanlon, T. M., ‘The Significance of Choice’, in S. M. McMurrin (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, viii (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1988).
89. Scanlon, T. M. What we Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998).
90. Scheffler, S., ‘Responsibility, Reactive Attitudes, and Liberalism in Philosophy and Politics’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 21 (1992), 299–323.
91. Scheffler, S. ‘Justice and Desert in Liberal Theory’, California Law Review, 88 (2000), 965–90; reprinted in S. Scheffler, Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 173–96.
92. Scheffler, S. ‘Rawls and Utilitarianism’, in S. Scheffler, Boundaries and Allegiances (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 149–72.
93. Schlick, M., Problems of Ethics, tr. D. Rynin (New York: Prentice-Hall, 1939), 143–58.
94. Scott Arnold, N., ‘Why Profits are Deserved’, Ethics, 97 (1987), 387–402.
95. Sher, G., ‘Effort, Ability, and Personal Desert’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 8 (1979), 361–76.
96. Sher, G. Desert (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987).
97. Sher, G. ‘Blame for Traits’, Nous, 35 (Mar. 2001), 146–61.
98. Sidgwick, H., The Methods of Ethics, 7th edn. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1981).
99. Smart, J. J. C., ‘Free-Will, Praise, and Blame’, Mind, 70 (1961), 291–306.
100. Smart, J. J. C. ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics’, in J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams, Utilitarianism For and Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).
101. Smilansky, S., ‘Responsibility and Desert: Defending the Connection’, Mind, 105 (1996), 157–63.
102. Smilansky, S. Free Will and Illusion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000).
103. Strawson, P., ‘Freedom and Resentment’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 48 (1962), 1–25; reprinted in J. M. Fischer and M. Ravizza (eds.), Perspectives on Moral Responsibility (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1993), 45–66.
104. Swift, A., Marshall, G., and Burgoyne, C., ‘Which Road to Social Justice?’, Sociology Review, 1 (1992), 28–31.
105. Temkin, L., Inequality (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).
106. Tungodden, B., ‘Responsibility and Reward’, Social Choice and Welfare (forthcoming).
107. Vallentyne, P., ‘Brute Luck, Option Luck, and Equality of Initial Opportunities’, Ethics, 112 (2002), 529–57.
108. Van Den Haag, E., ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty: A Legal-Practical-Moral Analysis’, Criminal Law Bulletin, 14 (1978), 51–68.
109. Wallace, R. J., Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994).
110. Wallace, R. J. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996).
111. Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1983).
112. Watson, G., ‘Free Agency’, Journal of Philosophy, 72 (1975), 205–20.
113. Watson, G. ‘Soft Libertarianism and Hard Compatibilism’, Journal of Ethics, 3 (1999), 351–65.
114. Watson, G. ‘Reasons and Responsibility’, Ethics, 111 (2001), 374–94.
115. White, S., ‘The Egalitarian Earnings Subsidy Scheme’, British Journal of Political Science, 29 (1999), 601–22.
116. Wolff, J., ‘Fairness, Respect and the Egalitarian Ethos’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27 (1998), 97–122.
117. Young, R., ‘Egalitarianism and Personal Desert’, Ethics, 102 (1992), 319–41.
118. Zaitchick, A., ‘On Deserving to Deserve’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10 (1977), 370–88.