Lines in the Sand: Between Common Foreign Policy and Single Foreign Policy

European Union Law for the Twenty-First Century: Rethinking the New Legal Order: Volume 1

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 259-272

  Denza, Eileen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85194842375     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (7)

1. R Jennings and A Watts, Oppenheim’s International Law, 9th edn (Harlow, Longman, 1996)Vol I, 122.
2. E Denza, The Intergovernmental Pillars of the European Union (Oxford, OUP, 2002) 33–35
3. R Gardiner, International Law (Harlow, Longman, 2003) chap 5, States.
4. C Warbrick ‘States and Recognition in International Law’, in M Evans (ed), International Law (Oxford, OUP, 2003) 229–30.
5. I Macleod, I Hendry and S Hyett, The External Relations of the European Communities (Oxford, OUP, 1996) 412: ‘But the process remains intergovernmental, subject to international law, not Community law. Its product is instruments governed by international law, not Community legislation.’
6. AG Tizzano, ‘The Foreign Relations Law of the EU: Between Supranationality and Intergovernmental Model’ chap 7 in Cannizarro (ed), The European Union as an Actor in International Relations (Kluwer Law International, 2000).
7. Holdgaard, ‘The European Community’s Implied External Competence after the Open Skies Cases’ (2003) European Foreign Affairs Review 366.