Legal Realism and the Taxonomy of Private Law

Structure and Justification in Private Law: Essays for Peter Birks

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 147-166

  Dagan, Hanoch ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85194758369     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. P Birks, ‘Introduction’ in P Birks (ed), English Private Law, vol 1 (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000) li.
2. E Weinrib, ‘The Juridical Classification of Obligations’ in P Birks (ed), The Classification of Obligations (Oxford, Clarendon, 1997) 37
3. B Leiter, ‘Legal Realism and Legal Positivism Reconsidered’ (2001) 111 Ethics 278.
4. H Dagan, ‘The Realist Conception of Law’ (2007) 57 University of Toronto Law Journal 607.
5. HLA Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford, Clarendon, 1961) 123, 141–2, 144.
6. K Llewellyn, ‘Some Realism about Realism’ in K Llewellyn, Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and in Practice (Chicago, IL, Chicago University Press, 1962) 42
7. F Cohen, ‘The Problems of Functional Jurisprudence’ in L Cohen (ed), The Legal Conscience: Selected Papers of Felix S Cohen (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1960) 77, 83;
8. K Llewellyn, The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals (Boston, MA, Little Brown, 1960) 77–91
9. K Llewellyn, ‘Remarks on the Theory of Appellate Decision and the Rules or Canons About How Statutes Are to Be Construed’ (1950) 3 Vanderbilt Law Review 395;
10. F Rodell, Woe Unto you, Lawyers! (New York, Pageant Press, 1939) 154, 160.
11. J Frank, Law and the Modern Mind (New York, Brentos, 1930) 138.
12. A Kronman, ‘Jurisprudential Responses to Legal Realism’ (1988) 73 Cornell Law Review 335, 335–6.
13. O Holmes, ‘The Path of the Law’ in O Holmes, Collected Legal Papers (New York, Harcourt, Brace and Howe, 1920) 167.
14. F Cohen, ‘Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach’ (1935) 35 Columbia Law Review 809, 811–12, 820–1, 827–9;
15. J Dewey, ‘Logical Method and Law’ in W W Fisher III, MJ Horowitz and TA Read (eds), American Legal Realism (New York, Oxford University Press, 1993) 185, 191, 193;
16. O Holmes, ‘Law in Science and Science in Law’ in Holmes, Collected Legal Papers, n 10 above, 210, 230, 232, 238–9.
17. R Cover, ‘Violence and the Word’ in M Minow et al (eds), Narrative, Violence, and the Law: the essays of Robert Cover (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992) 203.
18. R Gordon, ‘Unfreezing Legal Reality: Critical Approaches to Law’ (1987) 15 Florida State University Law Review 195, 212–14.
19. L Jaffe, ‘Law Making by Private Groups’ (1937) 51 Harvard Law Review 212.
20. K Llewellyn, ‘The Normative, the Legal, and the Law-jobs: The Problem of Juristic Method’ (1940) 49 Yale Law Journal 1355, 1362–5, 1367–8, 1370, 1381–3, 1387.
21. T Bechtler, ‘American Legal Realism Revaluated in Law’ in T Bechtler (ed), Social Context: Liber Amicorum Honouring Professor Lon L Fuller (Deventer, Kluwer, 1978) 3, 20–1;
22. H Jones, ‘Law and Morality in the Perspective of Legal Realism’ (1961) 61 Columbia Law Review 799, 801, 809;
23. H Yntema, ‘The Rational Basis of Legal Science’ (1931) 31 Columbia Law Review 295, 255.
24. H Yntema, ‘Jurisprudence on Parade’ (1941) 39 Michigan Law Review 1154, 1169.
25. J Bingham, ‘What is the Law?’ (1912) 11 Michigan Law Review 1, 17;
26. J Schlegel, American Legal Realism and Empirical Legal Science (Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press, 1995) chs 2
27. B Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1921) 105–6, 108.
28. W Twining,’ The Idea of Juristic Method: A Tribute to Karl Llewellyn’ (1993) 48 University of Miami Law Review 119, 151–2.
29. K Llewellyn, ‘American Common Law Tradition and American Democracy’ in Llewellyn, Jurisprudence, n 7 above, 282, 308–10.
30. H Oliphant, ‘A Return to Stare Decisis’ (1928) 14 American Bar Association Journal 71, 73–74, 159.
31. J Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, HLA Hart ed (London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1954) 14;
32. J Raz, The Authority of Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979) 40.
33. J Dewey, ‘My Philosophy of Law’ in Julius Rosenthal Foundation (ed), My Philosophy of Law: Credos of Sixteen American Scholars (Boston, MA, Boston Law Book Co, 1941) 73, 77
34. K Llewellyn, ‘Law and the Social Sciences’ in Llewellyn, Jurisprudence, n 7 above, 357, 361–2
35. S Smith, ‘Taking Law Seriously’ (2000) 50 University of Toronto Law Journal 241, 244.
36. J Feinman, ‘The Jurisprudence of Classification’ (1989) 41 Stanford Law Review 661, 710;
37. P Jaffey, ‘Classification and Unjust Enrichment’ (2004) 67 MLR 1012, 1013
38. D Herzog, Poisoning the Minds of the Lower Orders (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1998) 15–16, 18.
39. M Krygier, ‘Law as Tradition’ (1986) 5 Law&Philosophy 237, 242, 248.
40. S Waddams, Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003) 12–13, 226;
41. R Pound, ‘Classification of Law’ (1924) 37 Harvard Law Review 933, 942–3
42. G Samuel, ‘Can the Common Law be Mapped?’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 271, 286, 290, 295.
43. J Waldron, ‘Transcendental Nonsense and System in the Law’ (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review 16, 51 (2000).
44. P Birks, ‘Equity in the Modern Law: An Exercise in Taxonomy’ (1996) 26 University of Western Australia Law Review 1, 9.
45. G Samuel, ‘English Private Law: Old and New Thinking in the Taxonomy Debate’ (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 335, 341, 362
46. M Minow, Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1990) 3, 4, 8;
47. J Penner, ‘Basic Obligations’ in P Birks (ed), The Classification of Obligations (Oxford, Clarendon, 1997) 91
48. R Cotterrell, The Politics of Jurisprudence (London, Butterworths, 1989) 85–7, 106–9
49. A Altman, ‘The Legacy of Legal Realism’ (1986) 10 Legal Studies Forum 167, 171–172
50. T Rakoff, ‘The implied Terms of Contract: Of “Default Rules” and “Situation Sense”’ in J Beatson and D Friedmann (eds), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, Clarendon, 1995) 191, 216.
51. L Alexander and E Sherwin, The Rule of Rules (Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2001) 12–15.
52. F Schauer, ‘The Generality of Law’ (2004) 107 West Virginia Law Review 217, 224–34.
53. E Sherwin, ‘Rule-oriented Realism’ (2005) 103 Michigan Law Review 1578.
54. T Grey, ‘Freestanding Legal Pragmatism’ (1996) 18 Cardozo Law Review 21, 26
55. H Dagan, ‘The Craft of Property’ (2003) 92 California Law Review 1517.
56. K Llewellyn, The Bramble Bush (New York, Oceana, 1977) 48
57. M Martin, Legal Realism: American and Scandinavian (New York, Lang, 1997) 39–40, 76.
58. P Robinson and J Darley, ‘The Utility of Desert’ (1997) 91 Northwestern University Law Review 453, 479–482.
59. H Dagan, Unjust Enrichment: A Study of Private Law and Public Values (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977);
60. H Dagan, ‘Takings and Distributive Justice’ (1999) 85 Virginia Law Review 741.
61. D Herzog, Happy Slaves: A Critique of Consent Theory (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, 1989) 156, 166–8, 173–5.
62. A Schwartz and R Scott, ‘Contract Theory and the Limits of Contract Law’ (2003) 113 Yale Law Journal 541
63. G Calabresi, The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1970).
64. C Fried, Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1981) 7–17
65. D Markovitz, ‘Contract and Collaboration’ (2004) 114 Yale Law Journal 1419.
66. D Dobbs, Torts and Compensation: Personal Accountability and Social Responsibility for Injury (St Paul, MN, West Publishing, 2nd edn, 1993) 8–9
67. A Ripstein, Equality, Responsibility, and The Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999) 6;
68. G Keating, ‘Rawlsian Fairness and Regime Choice in the Law of Accidents’ (2004) 72 Fordham Law Review 1857, 1862–70.
69. E Weinrib, The Idea of Private Law (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1995).
70. E Weinrib, ‘Punishment and Disgorgement as Contract Remedies’ (2003) 78 Chicago-Kent Law Review 55.
71. W Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol 2 (London, Butterworth&Son, 1760) 2.
72. R Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (London, Duckworth, 1978) 118–23.
73. P Birks, ‘Definition and Division: A Mediation on Institutes 3.13’ in P Birks (ed), The Classification of Obligations (Oxford, Clarendon, 1997) 34–5;
74. W Fisher, ‘The Development of American Legal Theory and the Judicial Interpretation of the Bill of Rights’ in M Lacey and K Haakonssen (eds), A Culture of Rights (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991) 266, 275.
75. P Berger, B Berger and H Kellner, The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness (New York, Vintage Books, 1973) 63–82.
76. M Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York, Basic Books, 1983);
77. E Anderson, Value in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1993);
78. E Anderson, ‘Pragmatism, Science, and Moral Inquiry’ in R Fox and R Westbrook (eds), In the Face of Facts (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998) 10, 17.
79. R Kreitner, ‘Fear of Contract’ (2004) Wisconsin Law Review 429, 461–78;
80. F Schauer, ‘Prediction and Particularity’ (1998) 78 Boston University Law Review 773
81. A Schwartz, ‘The Default Rule Paradigm and the Limits of Contract Law’ (1994) 3 Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 389, 415–19.
82. P Birks, ‘Unjust Enrichment and Wrongful Enrichment’ (2001) 79 Texas Law Review 1767, 1794.
83. B Ackerman, ‘The Structure of Subchapter C: An Anthropological Comment’ (1977) 87 Yale Law Journal 436, 439.
84. R Scott and D Leslie, Contract Law and Theory (Charlottesville, VA, Michie, 2nd edn, 1993) 19.
85. A Schwartz, ‘Proposals for Products Liability Reform: A Theoretical Synthesis’ (1988) 97 Yale Law Journal 353
86. M Shapo, The Law of Products Liability (Salem, NH, Butterworth Legal Publishers, 3rd edn, 1994) lxxvii.
87. G Gilmore, The Death of Contract (Columbus, OH, Ohio State University Press, 1974).
88. H Dagan, The Law and Ethics of Restitution (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004) 34.
89. H Collins, ‘Legal Classifications as a Production of Knowledge System’ in P Birks (ed), The Classification of Obligations (Oxford, Clarendon, 1997) 57, 68.