Transnational Faces of Justice: Two Attempts to Build Common Standards Beyond National Boundaries

Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context: Essays in Honour of Professor Mirjan Damaška

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 221-250

  Jackson, John ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85194729170     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. M Damaška, ‘Negotiated Justice in International Criminal Courts’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice 1018, 1018–9.
2. M Damaška, ‘Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure’ (1973) 121 University Pennsylvania Law Review 506.
3. M Damaška, ‘Structures of Authority and Comparative Criminal Procedure’ (1975) 85 Yale Law Journal 480.
4. MR Damaška, The Faces of Authority and State Authority (New Haven, Yale UP, 1986).
5. M Damaška, ‘The Uncertain Fate of Evidentiary Transplants: Anglo-American and Continental Experiments’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law 839.
6. D Amann, ‘Harmonic Convergence? Constitutional Criminal Procedure in an International Context’ (2000) 75 Indiana Law Journal 809.
7. M Delmas-Marty and JR Spencer, European Criminal Procedures(Cambridge, CUP, 2002).
8. M Findlay, ‘Synthesis in Trial Procedures? The Experience of International Criminal Tribunals’ (2001) 50 International Comparative Law Quarterly 26.
9. G Robertson, Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice 2nd edn (London, Penguin Books, 2002).
10. SJ Summers, Fair Trials: The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2007).
11. MR Damaška, Evidence Law Adrift (New Haven, Yale UP, 1996) 134–8.
12. A Cassese, P Gaeta and JRWD Jones (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (Oxford, OUP, 2002).
13. WA Schabas, The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone (Cambridge, CUP, 2006) 67–73.
14. P Roberts, ‘Restoration and Retribution in International Criminal Justice: An Exploratory Analysis’ in A von Hirsch (ed), Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2003) 115, 136.
15. JD Jackson, ‘The Effect of Human Rights on Criminal Evidentiary Processes: Towards, Convergence, Divergence or Realignment’ (2005) 68 MLR 737.
16. M Delmas-Marty, Towards a Truly Common Law (Cambridge, CUP, 2002) 67.
17. AH Robertson and JG Merrills, Human Rights in Europe 3rd edn (Manchester, Manchester UP, 1993) 87.
18. AWB Simpson, Human Rights and the End of Empire (Oxford, OUP, 2001).
19. B Swart and J Young, ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and Criminal Justice in the Netherlands and the UK’ in P Fennell, C Harding, N Jorg and B Swart (eds), Criminal Justice in Europe: A Comparative Study (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995).
20. M Langer, ‘From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Processes’ (2004) 45 Harvard International Law Journal 1.
21. J F Nijboer, ‘Common Law Tradition in Evidence Scholarship Observed from a Continental Perspective’ (1993) 41 American Journal of Comparative Law 299, 311.
22. PTC van Kampen, Expert Evidence Compared (Leiden, E M Meijers Institute, 1998) 105-6.
23. J Pradel, ‘France’ in C Van Den Wyngaert (ed), Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community (London, Butterworths, 1993) 120.
24. V Dervieux, ‘The French System’ in Delmas-Marty and Spencer, above n 9, 218, 220-22.
25. JH Langbein, The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial (Oxford, OUP, 2003).
26. M Chiavario, ‘The Rights of the Defendant and the Victim’ in Delmas-Marty and Spencer, above n 9, 541, 548.
27. M Delmas-Marty, ‘Toward a European Model of the Criminal Trial’ in M Delmas- Marty (ed), The Criminal Process and Human Rights: Towards a European Consciousness (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1995) 191, 196.
28. M Delmas-Marty, La mise en état des affaires pénales: Rapport de la Commission justice pénale et droits de l’homme (Paris, La Documentation française, 1991).
29. J Hodgson, ‘Constructing the Pre-trial Role of the Defence in French Criminal Procedure: An Adversarial Outsider in an Inquisitorial Process’ (2002) 6 International Journal of Evidence & Proof 1
30. S Field and A West, ‘Dialogue and the Inquisitorial Tradition: French Defence Lawyers in the Pre-trial Criminal Process’ (2003) 14 Criminal Law Forum 261.
31. A Stone Sweet, The Judicial Construction of Europe (Oxford, OUP, 2004).
32. L Wildhaber, ‘A Constitutional Future of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2002) 23 Human Rights Law Journal 161.
33. G Mettraux, International Crimes and the Ad Hoc Tribunals (Oxford, OUP, 2005).
34. G Boas, The Milosevic Trial (Cambridge, CUP, 2007).
35. G Robertson, ‘General Editor’s Introduction to Essays on Fairness and Evidence in War Crimes Trials’ (2006) International Commentary on Evidence: Vol 4: Iss 1, Art 1.
36. C Francia, ‘Due Process in International Criminal Courts: Why Procedure Matters’ (2001) 87 Virginia LR 1381
37. M Fairlie, ‘The Marriage of Common Law and Continental Law at the ICTY and its Progeny, Due Process Model’ (2004) 4 International Criminal L R 243
38. P Wald, ‘Fair Trials for War Criminals’ (2006) International Commentary on Evidence: Vol 4: Iss 1, Art 6.
39. D Weissbrodt, The Right to a Fair Trial (The Hague, Kluwer, 2001) ch 3.
40. G Sluiter, ‘International Criminal Proceedings and the Protection of Human Rights’ (2003) 37 New England Law Review 935.
41. E J Wallach, ‘The Procedural and Evidentiary Rules of the Post - World War II War Trials: Did They Provide an Outline for International Legal Procedure?’ (1999) 37 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 851.
42. V Morris and M Scharf, An Insider’s Guide to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: A Documentary History and Analysis (Irvington-on-Hudson, NY, Transnational Publishers, 1995) 177.
43. V Tochilovsky, ‘Rules of Procedure for the International Criminal Court: Problems to Address in the light of the Experience of the Ad Hoc Tribunals’ (1999) Netherlands International Law Review 343, 359.
44. D A Mundis, ‘From “Common Law” toward “Civil Law”: The Evolution of the ICTY Rules of Procedure and Evidence’ (2001) 14 Leiden Journal of International Law 287.
45. S Zappala, Human Rights in International Criminal Proceedings (Oxford, OUP, 2003) 22-24.
46. M Langer, ‘The Rise of Managerial Judging in International Criminal Law’ (2005) 53 American Journal of Comparative Law 835.
47. FJ Pakes, ‘Styles of Trial Procedure at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ (2003) 17 Perspectives in Law and Psychology 309.
48. G Boas, ‘Creating Laws of Evidence for International Criminal Law: The ICTY and the Principle of Flexibility’ (2001) 12 Criminal Law Forum 41.
49. P Wald, ‘To “Establish Incredible Events by Credible Evidence”: The Use of Affidavit Testimony in Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal Proceedings’ (2001) 42 Harvard International Law Journal 535, 551.
50. O Kwok, ‘The Challenge of an International Criminal Trial as Seen from the Bench’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 360.
51. MP Scharf, Balkan Justice (Durham, Carolina Academic Press, 1997) 212.
52. R Cryer, ‘A Long Way from Home: Witnesses before International Criminal Tribunals’ (2006) International Commentary on Evidence: Vol 4: Iss 1, Art 8.
53. SD Roper and LA Barria, Designing Criminal Tribunals (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2006) 14.
54. C Jorda and J Hemptinne, ‘The Status and Role of the Victim’ in Cassese et al, above n 15, 1387.
55. G MacIntyre, ‘Equality of Arms - Defining Human Rights in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia’ (2003) 16 Leiden Journal of International Law 269.
56. SA Fernandez de Gurmendi, ‘International Criminal Law Procedures’ in R Lee (ed), The International Criminal Court - Issues, Negotiations, Results - The Making of the Rome Statute (The Hague, Kluwer, 1999) 234-235.
57. G Boas, ‘A Code of Evidence and Procedure for International Criminal Law? The Rules of the ICTY’ in G Boas and W A Schabas (eds), International Criminal Law Developments in the Case law of the ICTY (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 2003) 1, 26.
58. W Pizzi, ‘Overcoming Logistical and Structural Barriers to Fair Trials at International Tribunals’ (2006) International Commentary on Evidence: Vol 4: Iss 1, Art 4.
59. J Hodgson, French Criminal Justice (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2006).
60. G Sluiter, ‘The Law of Domestic Criminal Procedure and Domestic War Crimes Trials’ (2006) 6 International Criminal Law Review 605, 616.
61. M Miraglia, ‘The First Decision of the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber - International Criminal Procedure Rules Under Construction’ (2006) 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice 188.
62. Damaška, Evidence Law Adrift above n 13, 150.