Beware of the Trojan Horse: Dispute Settlement in (Mixed) Agreements and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order

Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 187-207

  Govaere, Inge ^a,b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies Department   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85194715485     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. J H H Weiler, ‘The autonomy of the Community legal order: through the looking glass’ in The Constitution of Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999) 286–323.
2. R Dehousse, La Cour de Justice des Communautés européennes (Paris, Montchretien, 1994) 132–33;
3. I Govaere, ‘The supranational courts and application of Community law: positive and negative aspects’ in D Ventura (ed), Direito Communautario do Mercosul (Brazil, Advogado Editoria, 1997) 139–61.
4. A Rosas, ‘International dispute settlement: EU practice and procedures’ (2003) 46 German Yearbook of International Law 284 at 292–308.
5. F Hoffmeister, ‘The contribution of EU practice to international law’ in M Cremona (ed), Developments in EU External Relations Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008) 37 at 88.
6. I Macleod, I D Hendry and S Hyett, The External Relations of the European Communities (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998) 158–59
7. J Heliskoski, Mixed agreements as a technique for organizing the international relations of the European Community and its Member States (The Hague/London/New York, Kluwer Law International, 2001) 157–73
8. C Kaddous, ‘Effects of International Agreements in the EU Legal Order’ in M Cremona and B de Witte (eds), EU Foreign Relations Law: Constitutional Fundamentals (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2008) 291–312.
9. A Rosas, ‘With a little help from my friends: international case-law as a source of reference for the EC courts’ (2006) 5 The Global Community YILJ 2005 203–30
10. A Rosas, ‘The European Court of Justice and fundamental rights: yet another case of judicial activism ?’ in C Baudenbacher and H Bull (eds), European Integration through Interaction of Legal Regimes (IUSEF No 50, University of Oslo, Universitetsforlaget, 2007) 33–63.
11. I Govaere, ‘External competence: What’s in a Name? The difficult conciliation between dynamism of the ECJ and dynamics of European integration’ in P Demaret, I Govaere and D Hanf (eds), European Legal Dynamics—Dynamiques juridiques européennes (New York, PIE Peter Lang, 2007) 467 at 476–80.
12. I Govaere, J Capiau and A Vermeersch, ‘In-between seats: the participation of the European Union in international organisations’ (2004) 9 EFARev 155.
13. A De Walsche, ‘Le contrôle jurisdictionnel des accords internationaux’ in Commentaire Megret, 12, Relations Extérieures (Bruxelles, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2005) 141 at 163–64.
14. S Adam, ‘Het Europees Hof van Justitie en andere internationale rechtsprekende organen. Enkele opmerkingen naar aanleiding van het MOXFabriek arrest’ (2007) Revue Belge de Droit International 113.