Cracking the Highest Glass Ceiling: A Global Comparison of Women’s Campaigns for Executive Office

Cracking the Highest Glass Ceiling: A Global Comparison of Women’s Campaigns for Executive Office

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-267

  Murray, Rainbow ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85189811532     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (29)

1. Alexander, Deborah, and Kristi Andersen. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46, no. 3 (1993): 527-545.
2. Bystrom, Dianne G. “Advertising, Web Sites, and Media Coverage.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, edited by Susan J. Carroll and Richard L. Fox. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
3. Bystrom, Dianne G., Marcy C. Banwart, Lynda Lee Kaid, and Terry A. Robertson. Gender and Candidate Communication: VideoStyle, WebStyle, NewsStyle. London: Routledge, 2004.
4. Carroll, Susan J. “Reflections on Gender and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign: The Good, the Bad, and the Misogynic.” Politics & Gender 5. no. 1 (2009): 1-20.
5. Carroll, Susan J., and Richard L. Fox. eds. Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
6. Devitt, James. “Framing Gender on the Campaign Trail: Women’s Executive Leadership and the Press.” Report to the Women’s Leadership Fund, 1999.
7. Dolan, Kathleen. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder: Westview Press, 2004.
8. Dolan, Kathleen. “Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Websites.” Political Research Quarterly 58, no. 1 (2005): 31-44.
9. Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. “Reconceiving Theories of Power: Consequences of Masculinism in the Executive Branch.” In The Other Elites: Women, Politics, and Power in the Executive Branch, edited by Mary Anne Borrelli and Janet M. Martin. Boulder. CO: Lynne Reinner, 1997.
10. Dolan, Kathleen. “Presidential Elections: Gendered Space and the Case of 2004.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, edited by Susan J. Carroll and Richard L. Fox. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
11. Dolan, Kathleen. “Masculinity on the Campaign Trail.” In Rethinking Madam President: Are We Ready for a Woman in the White House? edited by Lori Cox Han and Caroline Heldman, 87-112. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2007.
12. Falk, Erika. Women for President: Media Bias in Eight Campaigns. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2008.
13. Heldman, Caroline, Susan J. Carroll, and Stephanie Olson. “She brought only a skirt: print media coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s bid for the Republican presidential nomination.” Political Communication 22, no. 3 (2005): 315-335.
14. Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37, no. 1 (1993a): 119-147.
15. Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46, no. 3 (1993b): 503-525.
16. Jalalzai, Farida. “Women Candidates and the Media: 1992-2000 Elections.” Politics and Policy 34, no. 3 (2006): 606-633.
17. Jalalzai, Farida. “Women Rule: Shattering the Executive Glass Ceiling.” Politics & Gender 4, no. 2 (2008): 205-232.
18. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
19. Kahn, Kim Fridkin. “Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of the Effects of Candidate Gender and Campaign Coverage on Evaluations of U.S. Senate Candidates.” Journal of Politics 54, vol. 2 (1992): 497-517.
20. Kahn, Kim Fridkin. “Gender Differences in Campaign Messages: the Political Advertisements of Men and Women Candidates for U.S. Senate.” Political Research Quarterly 46, no. 3 (1993): 481-502.
21. Kahn, Kim Fridkin. “Does Gender Make a Difference? An Experimental Examination of Sex Stereotypes, and Press Patterns in Statewide Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (1994): 162-195.
22. Kahn, Kim Fridkin. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
23. Kittilson, Miki Caul and Kim Fridkin. “Gender, Candidate Portrayals, and Election Campaigns: a Comparative Perspective.” Politics & Gender 4, no. 3 (2008): 385.
24. Koch, Jeffrey. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?" Journal of Politics 62, no. 2 (2000): 414-429.
25. Koch, Jeffrey. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens’ Impressions of House Candidates’ Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 46, no. 2 (2002): 453-462.
26. Lawrence, Regina, and Melody Rose. Hillary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender Politics & the Media on the Campaign Trail. Boulder. CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2009.
27. Norris, Pippa, ed. Women. Media, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
28. Sczesny, Sabine, Janine Bosak, Daniel Neff, and Birgit Schyns. “Gender Stereotypes and the Attribution of Leadership Traits: a Cross-Cultural Comparison.” Sex Roles 51, no. 11/12 (2004): 633.
29. Smith, Kevin. “When All’s Fair: Signs of Parity in Media Coverage of Female Candidates.” Political Communication 14 (1997): 71-82.