Representation and activation in syntactic processing

Attention and Performance

Volumn 16, Issue , 1996, Pages 433-456

  MacDonald, Maryellen C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349151815     PISSN: 10470387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Altmann, G. T. M., and Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191-238.
2. Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structure. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.
3. Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Garrod, S., and Rayner, K. (1992). Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their limits. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 293-314.
4. Burgess, C. (1991). Interaction of semantic, syntactic and visual factors in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Ph.D. diss., University of Rochester.
5. Burke, D. and Yee, P. L. (1984). Semantic priming during sentence processing by young and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 20, 903-910.
6. Chomsky, N. (1982) Lectures on government and binding, Dordrecht: Foris.
7. Clifton, C. and Ferreira, F. (1989). Ambiguity in context. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI 77-104.
8. Connine, C. M. (1987). Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 527-538.
9. Connine, C., Blasko, D. G., and Hall, M. (1991). Effects of subsequent sentence context in auditory word recognition: Temporal and linguistic constraints. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 234-250.
10. Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., and Wang, J. (1994). Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: Multiple lexical activation, individual differences, and the role of sentence context. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 624-636.
11. Connine, C., Ferreira, F., Jones, C., Clifton, C., and Frazier, L. (1984). Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 307-319.
12. Daneman, M., and Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
13. Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., and Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429-226.
14. Ferreira, F., and Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348-368.
15. Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Ford, M., Bresnan, J., and Kaplan, R. M. (1982). A competence-based theory of syntactic closure. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations, 727-796. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Forster, K. I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. Cooper and E. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Francis, W. N., and Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
19. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Frazier, L. (1994). Sentence (re-)analysis. Unpublished manuscript. University of Massachusetts.
21. Inoue, A. and Fodor, J. D. (1995). Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In R. Mazuka, and N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese Sentence Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Just, M. A., and Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 98, 122-149.
23. Kawamoto, A. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 474-516.
24. MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 157-201.
25. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., and Seidenberg, M. S. (1994a). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
26. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., and Seidenberg, M. S. (1994b). Syntactic ambiguity resolution as lexical ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, and K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Massaro, D. W. (1989) Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 398-421.
28. McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading, 3-36. London: Erlbaum.
29. McClelland, J. L. (1991). Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1-44.
30. McClelland, J. L., and Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
31. Ni, W., and Crain, S. (1990). How to resolve structural ambiguities. In Proceeding of the 20th annual meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, 414-427. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Students Association.
32. Pearlmutter, N. J., and MacDonald, M. C. (1992). Plausibility and syntactic ambiguity resolution. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Society, 498-503. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Pearlmutter, N. J., and MacDonald, M. C. (1995). Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 521-542.
34. Potter, M. C., Moryadas, A., Abrams, I., and Noel, A. (1993). Word perception and misperception in context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 3-22.
35. Potter, M. C., Stiefbold, and Moryadas, A. (1995). Word selection in reading sentences: Preceding versus following contexts. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.
36. Rayner, K., Carlson, M., and Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358-374.
37. Rayner, K., Garrod, S., and Perfetti, C. A. (1992). Discourse influences during parsing are delayed. Cognition, 45, 109-139.
38. Salthouse, T. A. (1982). Adult cognition: An experimental psychology of human aging. New York: Springer.
39. Simpson, G. B. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 316-340.
40. Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Trueswell, J. C., and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1993). Context and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 276-309.
41. Stallings, L., MacDonald, M. C., and O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1995). Constraints on phrase order: Effects of length and verb disposition. Submitted.
42. Stevens, K., MacDonald, M. C., Schuster, S. P., and Harm, M. (1995). Aging and the use of context in ambiguity resolution. Poster presented at the Seventh Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Tucson, Arizona.
43. Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.
44. Tabossi, P., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., McRae, K., and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Semantic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution: Evidence for a constraint-based resolution process. In C. Umiltà and M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV, 589-616. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Taraban, R., and McClelland, J. L. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expectations. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 597-632.
46. Trueswell, J. C., and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1991). Tense, temporal context, and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 339-350.
47. Trueswell, J. C., and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1992). Consulting temporal context during sentence comprehension: Evidence from the monitoring of eye movements in reading. In 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 492-497.
48. Trueswell, J. C., and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework of constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier and K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing, 155-179. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, and Gamsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.
50. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., and Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528-553.