Guiding senior secondary students towards writing academically-valued responses to poetry

Language and Literacy: Functional Approaches

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 249-263

  Marshall, Susan ^a  

^a Education and Manpower Bureau   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STUDENTS;

EID: 85188088392     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Alonso, I. and McCabe, A. (2003), ‘Improving text flow in ESL learner compositions’, The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. IX, No 2, February. Available: www.iteslj.org.
2. Coffin, C. (2002), ‘The voices of history: theorizing the interpersonal semantics of historical discourses’, Text, 22, (4), 503-28.
3. Danes, F. (1974), ‘Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text’, in F. Danes (ed.), Papers in Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia, pp. 106-28.
4. Droga, L. and Humphrey, S. (2002), Getting Started with Functional Grammar. Sydney: Target Texts.
5. Eggins, S. (1994), An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
6. Fries, P. (1981), ‘On the status of Theme in English: Arguments from discourse’, Forum Linguisticum, 6, 1-38.
7. Fries, P. (2004), ‘What makes a text coherent?', in D. Banks (ed.), Text and Texture. L’Harmattan: Paris, pp. 9-50.
8. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985), Spoken and Written Language. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
9. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994), An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: E Iward Arnold.
10. Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (eds) (1993), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.
11. Hasan, R. (1985), Linguistics, Language and Verbal Art. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
12. Johns, A. (1997), Text, Role, and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Leckie-Tarry, H. (1995). Language and Context: A Functional Linguistic Theory of Register. London: Pinter.
14. Lock, G. (1996), Functional English Grammar: an Introduction for Second Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Marshall, S. A. (2002), WRAP-Wnting for Academic Purposes, CD-ROM. Adelaide: Method Media.
16. Martin, J. R. (1986), ‘Intervening in the process of writing development’, in J. R. Martin and C. Painter (eds), Writing to Mean: Teaching Genres across the Curriculum. Sydney, Applied Linguistics Association of Australia Occasional Papers Number 9, pp. 11-43.
17. Martin, J. R. (1993), ‘Technicality and abstraction: language for the creation of specialized texts’, in Halliday and Martin (eds), pp. 203-20.
18. Schleppegrell, M. (2000), ‘How SFL can inform writing instruction: the grammar of expository essays’, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses. 40, 171-88.
19. Schleppegrell, M. (2004), The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
20. White, P. (1998), ‘Towards a grammar of power and solidarity-developments in the linguistics of evaluation, inter-subjectivity, and ideological position’. Paper presented at the Tenth Euro-international Systemic Functional Workshop. The University of Liverpool, 22-25 July.