Fathers’ Rights Activism and Law Reform in Comparative Perspective

Fathers’ Rights Activism and Law Reform in Comparative Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-174

  Collier, Richard ^a   Sheldon, Sally ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85187343365     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (370)

1. ALANEN, L, Modern Childhood? Exploring the ‘Child Question’ in Sociology (Jyväskylä, Institute for Educational Research, 1992).
2. ALBERTS, S, ‘Class-Action Suit Threatened over Suffering by Children of Divorce’ National Post, 20 July 1999.
3. AMATO, PR and JG GILBRETH, ‘Nonresident Fathers and Children’s Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis’ (1999) 61 Journal of Marriage and the Family 557.
4. ARDITTI, J and K ALLEN, ‘Distressed Fathers’ Perceptions of Legal and Relational Inequities Post-Divorce’ (1993) 31 Family and Conciliation Courts Review 461.
5. ARENDELL, T, ‘The Social Self as Gendered: A Masculinist Discourse of Divorce’ (1992) 15 Symbolic Interactionism 151.
6. ARENDELL, T, Fathers and Divorce (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1995).
7. ARTS, W and J GELISSEN, ‘Three Worlds ofWelfare Capitalism or More? A State of the Art Report’ (2002) 12 Journal of European Social Policy 137.
8. ASHE, M, ‘Postmodernism, Legal Ethics, and Representation of “Bad Mothers”' in M FINEMAN and I KARPIN, Mothers in Law: Feminist Theory and the Legal Regulation of Motherhood (New York, Columbia University Press, 1995).
9. BACKETT, K, ‘The Negotiation of Fatherhood’ in C LEWIS and M O’BRIEN (eds), Reassessing Fatherhood: New Observations on Fathers and the Modern Family (London, Sage, 1987).
10. BAILEY, MJ and M GIROUX, Relocation of Custodial Parents: Final Report (Ottawa, Status of Women Canada, 1998).
11. BAILEY-HARRIS, R, J BARRON and J PEARCE, ‘From Utility to Rights? The Presumption of Contact in Practice’ (1999) 13 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 111.
12. BAINHAM, A, ‘Contact as a Fundamental Right’ (1995) 54 Cambridge Law Journal 255.
13. BAKER-FLETCHER, GK, Black Religion after the Million Man March (Maryknoll, NY, Orbis, 1998).
14. BALA, N, ‘A Report from Canada’s “Gender War Zone”: Reforming the Child Related Provision in the Divorce Act’ (1999) 16 Canadian Journal of Family Law 163.
15. BALKMAR, D, L IOVANNI and K PRINGLE, ‘Mäns våld i Danmark och Sverige’ NIKK Magasin. Temanummer Kön och våld (‘Men’s violence in Denmark and Sweden’, NIKK Magazine, special issue on gender and violence) 2 (2005) 22.
16. BALKMAR, D and K PRINGLE, Sweden National Report on Research on Men’s Practices (2005) EU Framework 6 Co-ordinated Action on Human Rights (CAHRV), http: //www.cromenet.org.
17. BANDES, SA, The Passions of Law (New York, New York University Press, 1999).
18. BARNOMBUDSMANNEN, När tryggheten står på spel (When safety is at stake) (Stockholm, Barnombudsmannen, 2005).
19. BAUMAN, Z, Intimations of Postmodernity (London, Routledge, 1992).
20. BAUMLI, F, Men Freeing Men: Exploding the Myth of the Traditional Male (Jersey City, NJ, New Atlantis, 1985).
21. BAXTER, J and M WESTON, ‘Women’s Satisfaction with the Domestic Division of Labour’ (1997) 47 Family Matters 16.
22. BECK, U, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London, Sage, 1992).
23. BECK, U and E BECK GERNSHEIM, The Normal Chaos of Love (Cambridge, Polity, 1995).
24. BECK, U and E BECK GERNSHEIM, Individualisation (London, Sage, 2002).
25. BEKKENGEN, L, Man får välja-om föräldraskap och föräldraledighet i arbetsliv och familjeliv (Man/one may choose-on parenthood and parental leave at work and in family life) (Malmö, Liber, 2002).
26. BENFORD, R and D SNOW, ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment’ (2000) 26 Annual Review of Sociology 611.
27. BENTLY, L and L FLYNN, Law and the Senses (London, Pluto, 1996).
28. BERGMAN, H and B HOBSON, ‘Compulsory Fatherhood: The Coding of Fatherhood in the Swedish Welfare State’ in B HOBSON (ed), Making Men into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002).
29. BERNARD, J, ‘The Good-Provider Role: Its Rise and Fall’ (1981) 36 American Psychologist 1.
30. BERTOIA, C, ‘An Interpretative Analysis of the Mediation Rhetoric of Fathers’ Rightists: Privatization versus Personalization’ (1998) 16(1) Mediation Quarterly 15.
31. BERTOIA, C and J DRAKICH, ‘The Fathers’ Rights Movement: Contradictions in Rhetoric and Practice’ (1993) 14(4) Journal of Family Issues 592.
32. BETTS, K, ‘People and Parliamentarians: The Great Divide’ (2004) 12 People and Place 64.
33. BIANCHI, SM, L SUBAIYA and J KAHN, ‘The Gender Gap in the Economic Well-being of Nonresident Fathers and Custodial Mothers’ (1999) 36 Demography 195.
34. BLANKENHORN, D, Fatherless America: Confronting our Most Urgent Social Problem (New York, Basic Books 1995).
35. BOURQUE, DM, '“Reconstructing” the Patriarchal Nuclear Family: Recent Developments in Child Custody and Access in Canada’ (1995) 10(1) Canadian Journal of Law and Society 1.
36. BOYD, S, ‘Backlash and the Construction of Legal Knowledge: The Case of Child Custody Law’ (2001) 20 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 141.
37. BOYD, S, Child Custody, Law and Women’s Work (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003).
38. BOYD, S, ‘Walking the Line: Canada’s Responses to Child Custody Law Reform Discourses’ (2003) 21 Canadian Family Law Quarterly 397.
39. BOYD, S, ‘Backlash Against Feminism: Custody and Access Reform Debates of the Late 20th Century’ (2004) 16(2) Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 255.
40. BOYD, S, ‘Demonizing Mothers: Fathers’ Rights Discourses in Child Custody Law Reform Processes’ (2004) 6(1) Journal of the Association for Research in Mothering 52.
41. BOYD, S and C YOUNG, ‘Who Influences Family Law Reform? Discourses on Motherhood and Fatherhood in Legislative Reform Debates in Canada’ (2002) 26 Studies in Law, Politics & Society 43.
42. BOYD, S and C YOUNG, ‘Feminism, Fathers’ Rights, and Family Catastrophes: Parliamentary Discourses on Post-Separation Parenting, 1966-2003' in DE CHUNN, SB BOYD and H LESSARD (eds), Feminism, Law, and Social Change: (Re)Action and Resistance (forthcoming).
43. BRANNEN, J, G MESZAROS, P MOSS and G POLAND, Employment and Family Life: A Review of Research in the UK (1980-1994), Department of Employment Research Series No 4 (London, University of London, 1994).
44. BRAVER, S and D O’CONNELL, Divorced Dads: Shattering the Myths (New York, Tarcher-Putnam, 1998).
45. BRITTAN, A, Masculinity and Power (Oxford, Blackwell, 1989).
46. BROWN, J and S DAY SCLATER, ‘Divorce: A Psychodynamic Perspective’ in S DAY SCLATER and C PIPER (eds), Undercurrents of Divorce (Aldershot, Ashgate, 1999).
47. BROWN, S, ‘Changes in Laws Governing Divorce: An Evaluation of Joint Custody Presumptions’ (1984) 5 Journal of Family Issues 200.
48. BRUCH, C, ‘Parental Alienation Syndrome and Alienated Children-Getting it Wrong in Child Custody Cases’ [2002] 14 (4) Child and Family Law Quarterly 381.
49. CAHILL, D, ‘New-Class Discourse and the Construction of Left-Wing Elites’ in M SAWER and B HINDESS (eds), Us and Them: Anti-Elitism in Australia (Perth, API Network, 2004).
50. CANADA, Department of Justice, Response to the Report of the Special Joint Committee on Child Custody and Access: Strategy for Reform (Ottawa, Department of Justice, 1999).
51. CANADA, Department of Justice, Custody, Access and Child Support in Canada: Report on Federal-Provincial-Territorial Consultations (Ottawa, IER Planning, Research and Management Services, presented to the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Family Law Committee, 2001).
52. CANADA, Department of Justice, Post-Separation Visitation Disputes: Differential Interventions by R Birnbaum and W McTavish (paper prepared for the Family, Children and Youth Section, 2001).
53. CANADA, Department of Justice, Final Federal-Provincial-Territorial Report on Custody and Access and Child Support: Putting Children First (Custody and Access Project of the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Family Law Committee, 2002).
54. CANADA, Department of Justice, An Overview of the Risks and Protectors for Children of Separation and Divorce by SC Bernardini and JM Jenkins (paper prepared for the Family, Children and Youth Section, 2002).
55. CANADA, Special Joint Committee on Child Custody and Access, For the Sake of the Children (Ottawa, Parliament of Canada, 1998).
56. CARRIGAN, T, R CONNELL and J LEE, ‘Towards a New Sociology of Masculinity’ (1985) 14 Theory and Society 551.
57. CASS, B, ‘The Changing Face of Poverty in Australia: 1972-1982' (1985) 1 Australian Feminist Studies 67.
58. CHUNN, DE, SB BOYD and H LESSARD (Re)Action and Resistance: Feminism, Law and Social Change (Vancouver, UBC Press, forthcoming).
59. COBBS, C, ‘The Custody Fight on the Hill’ Ottawa Citizen, 12 October 1998.
60. COBBS, C, ‘A Bill of Rights for Divorced Parents’ Ottawa Citizen, 9 December 1998.
61. COHEN, J and N GERSHBAIN, ‘For the Sake of the Fathers? Child Custody Reform and the Perils of Maximum Contact’ (2001) 19 Canadian Family Law Quarterly 121.
62. COLLIER, R, Masculinity, Law and the Family (London, Routledge, 1995).
63. COLLIER, R, '“Coming Together?": Post-Heterosexuality, Masculine Crisis and the New Men’s Movement’ (1996) 4(1) Feminist Legal Studies 3.
64. COLLIER, R, ‘Feminising the Workplace? (Re)constructing the “Good Parent” in Employment Law and Family Policy’ in A MORRIS and T O’DONNELL (eds), Feminist Perspectives on Employment Law (London, Cavendish, 1999).
65. COLLIER, R, ‘From “Women’s Emancipation” to “Sex War”?: Beyond the Masculinized Discourse of Divorce’ in SD SCLATER and C PIPER (eds), Undercurrents of Divorce (Aldershot, Dartmouth, 1999).
66. COLLIER, R, ‘Men, Heterosexuality and the Changing Family: (Re)constructing Fatherhood in Law and Social Policy’ in C WRIGHT and G JAGGAR (eds), Changing Family Values (London, Routledge, 1999).
67. COLLIER, R, ‘A Hard Time to be a Father?: Law, Policy and Family Practices’ (2001) 28 Journal of Law and Society 520.
68. COLLIER, R, ‘Reflections on the Relationship Between Law and Masculinities: Rethinking the “Man Question” in Legal Studies’ (2003) 56 Current Legal Problems 345.
69. COLLIER, R, ‘Fathers 4 Justice, Law and the New Politics of Fatherhood’ (2005) 17(4) Child and Family Law Quarterly 1.
70. COLLIER, R and S SHELDON, Fatherhood: A Socio-Legal Study (Oxford, Hart, forthcoming).
71. COLTRANE, S, ‘Marketing the Marriage Solution: Misplaced Simplicity in the Politics of Fatherhood’ (2001) 44 Sociological Perspectives 387.
72. COLTRANE, S and N HICKMAN, ‘The Rhetoric of Rights and Needs: Moral Discourse in the Reform of Child Custody and Child Support Laws’ (1992) 39 Social Problems 400.
73. Commonwealth Attorney-General’s Department, The Contact Orders Program: A Summary of the Independent Evaluation of the Contact Orders Pilot (Canberra, 2003).
74. Commonwealth, House of Representatives, Standing Committee on Family and Community Affairs, Every Picture Tells a Story: Report on the Inquiry into Child Custody Arrangements in the Event of Family Separation (Australian Government Publishing Service, 2003).
75. CONELL, C and S COHN, ‘Learning from Other People’s Actions: Environmental Variation and Diffusion in French Coal Mine Strikes, 1890-1935' (1995) 101 American Journal of Sociology 366.
76. CONNELL, RW, ‘Change among the Gatekeepers: Men, Masculinities, and Gender Equality in the Global Arena’ (2005) 30(3) Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1801.
77. CONNELL, RW, Gender and Power (Cambridge, Polity, 1987).
78. CONNELL, RW, Masculinities (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1995).
79. COSIC, M, ‘Uncivil War’ The Australian Magazine, 21-22 August 1999.
80. COSSMAN, B, ‘Family Feuds: Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservative Visions of the Reprivatization Project’ in B COSSMAN and J FUDGE (eds), Privatization, Law and the Challenge to Feminism (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2002).
81. COVER, R, ‘Nomos and Narrative’ (1983) 97 Harvard Law Review 4.
82. COVER, R, ‘Violence and the Word’ (1986) 95 Yale Law Review 1601.
83. CROWLEY, JE, ‘Supervised Devolution: The Case of Child Support Enforcement’ (2000) 30 Publius: The Journal of Federalism 99.
84. CROWLEY, JE, ‘Who Institutionalizes Institutions? The Case of Paternity Establishment in the United States’ (2001) 82 Social Science Quarterly 312.
85. CROWLEY, JE, ‘The Rise and Fall of Court Prerogatives in Paternity Establishment’ (2002) 23 Justice System Journal 363.
86. CROWLEY, JE, ‘The Gentrification of Child Support Enforcement Services, 1950-1984' (2003) 77 Social Services Review 585.
87. CROWLEY, JE, The Politics of Child Support in America (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2003).
88. CROWLEY, JE, ‘Organizational Responses to the Fatherhood Crisis: The Case of Fathers’ Rights Groups in the United States’ (forthcoming 2006) 39 Marriage and Family Review.
89. CROWLEY, JE, book manuscript on Fathers’ Rights Groups in the United States, in preparation.
90. CZAPANSKIY, K, ‘Volunteers and Draftees: The Struggle for Parental Equality’ (1991) 38 UCLA Law Review 415.
91. DANIELS, CR, ‘Introduction’ in CR DANIELS (ed), Lost Fathers (New York, St Martin’s Press, 1998).
92. DAY SCLATER, S, ‘Divorce-Coping Strategies, Conflict and Dispute Resolution’ [1998] Family Law 150.
93. DAY SCLATER, S, The Psychology of Divorce: A Research Report to the ESRC (London, University of East London, 1998).
94. DAY SCLATER, S, Divorce: A Psycho-Social Study (Aldershot, Ashgate, 1999).
95. DAY SCLATER, S, ‘Families Reunited’ (2003) FQ: The Magazine For Modern Dads (Winter) 56.
96. DAY SCLATER, S and F KAGANAS, ‘Contact: Mothers, Welfare and Rights’ in A BAINHAM, B LINDLEY, M RICHARDS and L TRINDER (eds), Children and Their Families (Oxford, Hart, 2003).
97. DAY SCLATER, S and C PIPER, ‘Re-Moralising the Family? Family Policy, Family Law and Youth’ [2000] 12 (3) Child and Family Law Quarterly 135.
98. DAY SCLATER, S and C YATES, ‘The Psycho-Politics of Post Divorce Parenting’ in A BAINHAM, S DAY SCLATER and M RICHARDS (eds), What is a Parent? A Socio-Legal Analysis (Oxford, Hart
99. DAY SCLATER, S and C YATES, ‘The Psycho-Politics of Post Divorce Parenting’ in A BAINHAM, S DAY SCLATER and M RICHARDS (eds), What is a Parent? A Socio-Legal Analysis (Oxford, Hart, 1999).
100. DE HAAN, W and I LOADER, ‘On the Emotions of Crime and Punishment and Social Control’ (2002) 6(3) Theoretical Criminology 243.
101. DEKESEREDY, W, ‘Tactics of the Antifeminist Backlash Against Canadian National Woman Abuse Surveys’ (1999) 5(11) Violence Against Women 1258.
102. DELOREY, AM, ‘Joint Legal Custody: A Reversion to Patriarchal Power’ (1989) 3(1) Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 33.
103. DENCH, D, Exploring Variations in Men’s Family Roles: Joseph Rowntree Foundation Social Policy Research Findings No 99 (York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1996).
104. DENNIS, N and G ERDOS, Families Without Fatherhood (London, Institute of Economic Affairs, 1993).
105. DEWAR, J, ‘The Family Law Reform Act 1995 (Cth) and the Children Act 1989 (UK) Compared-Twins or Distant Cousins?' (1996) 10 Australian Journal of Family Law 18.
106. DEWAR, J, ‘The Normal Chaos of Family Law’ (1998) 61 Modern Law Review 467.
107. DEWAR, J, ‘Family Law and its Discontents’ (2000) 14 International Journal of Law, Policy and Family 59.
108. DEWAR, J, J GIDDINGS and S PARKER, ‘The Impact of Legal Aid Changes on Family Law Practice’ (1999) 13 Australian Journal of Family Law 33.
109. DIAMOND, B, ‘The Special Joint Committee on Custody and Access: A Threat to Women’s Equality Rights’ (1999) 19 Canadian Woman Studies 182.
110. DIDUCK, A, Law’s Families (London, LexisNexis, 2003).
111. DINGWALL, R, ‘Some Problems about Predicting Child Abuse and Neglect’ in O STEVENSON (ed), Child Abuse: Professional Practice and Public Policy (Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989).
112. DIR (Sweden) (Committee instructions) 120. Handläggning av vårdnadstvister (The handling of custody disputes) (Stockholm, Fritzes, 1993).
113. DOUGLAS, M, ‘Emotion and Culture in Theories of Justice’ (1993) 22(4) Economy and Society 501.
114. DOWD, N, Redefining Fatherhood (New York, New York University Press, 2000).
115. DS (Sweden) (Departmental Series) 2. Slutrapport från arbetsgruppen om papporna, barnen och arbetslivet (Final report from the working group on daddies, children and working life) (Stockholm, Fritzes, 1995).
116. DUNCAN, S, A CARLING and R EDWARDS, Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice (London, Routledge, 2002).
117. DUNCAN, S and R EDWARDS, Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 1999).
118. DUNN, J, ‘Contact and Children’s Perspectives on Parental Relationships’ in A BAINHAM, B LINDLEY, M RICHARDS and L TRINDER (eds), Children and Their Families (Oxford, Hart, 2003).
119. DUNNE, JE, EW HUDGINS and J BABCOCK, ‘Can Changing the Divorce Law Affect Post-Divorce Adjustment?' (2000) 33 Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 35.
120. DYMOND, T, ‘A History of the “New Class” Concept in Australian Public Discourse’ in M SAWER and B HINDESS (eds), Us and Them: Anti-Elitism in Australia (Perth, API Network, 2004).
121. EDUARDS, M, Förbjuden Handling (Forbidden Action) (Malmö, Liber, 2002).
122. ELLIS, E, Divorce Wars: Interventions with Families in Conflict (Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 2000).
123. ELROD, LD, Child Custody, Practice and Procedure (Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1993 and Supp 2002).
124. ERIKSSON, M, I skuggan av Pappa. Familjerätten och hanteringen av fäders våld (In the shadow of Daddy. Family law and the handling of fathers’ violence) (Stehag, Gondolin, 2003).
125. ERIKSSON, M, ‘A Visible or Invisible Child? Professionals’ Approaches to Children whose Father is Violent towards their Mother’ in M ERIKSSON, M HESTER, S KESKINEN and K PRINGLE (eds), Tackling Men’s Violence in Families. Nordic Issues and Dilemmas (Bristol, Policy Press, 2005).
126. ERIKSSON, M and M HESTER, ‘Violent Men as Good-Enough Fathers? A Look at England and Sweden’ (2001) 7 Violence Against Women 779.
127. ERIKSSON, M, M HESTER, S KESKINEN and K PRINGLE, Tackling Men’s Violence in Families. Nordic Issues and Dilemmas (Bristol, Policy Press, 2005).
128. ERIKSSON, M and K PRINGLE, ‘Introduction: Nordic Issues and Dilemmas’ in M ERIKSSON, M HESTER, S KESKINEN and K PRINGLE (eds), Tackling Men’s Violence in Families. Nordic Issues and Dilemmas (Bristol, Policy Press, 2005).
129. ESPING-ANDERSEN, G, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge, Polity, 1990).
130. EYERMAN, J and A JAMISON, Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach (Cambridge, Polity, 1991).
131. FALCONER, C, C CLARKE and P HEWITT, ‘Ministerial Forward’ In Parental Separation: Children’s Needs and Parents’ Responsibilities, 6273 (London, HMSO, 2004).
132. FALUDI, S, Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women (London, Chatto and Windus, 1991).
133. FALUDI, S, Stiffed: The Betrayal of the Modern Man (London, Chatto and Windus, 1999).
134. FAROUQUE, F, ‘The Male Backlash’, The Age, 25 June 2005.
135. FARRELL, W, The Myth of Male Power: Why Men are the Disposable Sex (New York, Simon & Schuster, 1993).
136. FATHERHOOD FOUNDATION, ‘Howard’s Betrayal’, Dads on the Air: http://www.dadsontheair.com/index.php?page=showcomments&id=209.
137. FEATHERSTONE, B, ‘Taking Fathers Seriously’ (2003) 33 (2) British Journal of Social Work 239.
138. FERREE, MM, ‘Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debates of the United States and Germany’ (2003) 109 American Journal of Sociology 304.
139. FINEMAN, M, ‘Dominant Discourse, Professional Language, and Legal Change in Child Custody Decisionmaking’ (1988) 101 Harvard Law Review 727.
140. FINEMAN, M, The Illusion of Equality: The Rhetoric and Reality of Divorce Reform (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1991).
141. FINEMAN, M, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and other Twentieth Century Tragedies (New York and London, Routledge, 1995).
142. FISHER, T, ‘Family Mediators and Lawyers Communicating about Children: PDRLand and Lawyer-Land’ (2003) 9(2) Journal of Family Studies 201.
143. FLOOD, M, ‘Men’s Movements’ (1998) 46 Community Quarterly 62.
144. FLOOD, M, Fatherhood and Fatherlessness (ACT, The Australia Institute, Discussion Paper No 59, 2003).
145. FLOOD, M, ‘Backlash: Angry Men’s Movements’ in SE ROSSI (ed), The Battle and Backlash Rage On: Why Feminism Cannot be Obsolete (Philadelphia, Xlibris Press, 2004).
146. FLOOD, M, ‘Separated Fathers and the Fathers’ Rights Movement’ presented at Feminism, Law and the Family, workshop held at Melbourne Law School, 24 February 2006.
147. FOLKESSON, P, Nordisk mansforskning-en kartläggning (Nordic studies on men-an overview) (Karlstads universitet, Karlstad, Jämställdhetscentrum, 2000).
148. FUREDI, F, Paranoid Parenting (London, Allen Lane, 2002).
149. FURSTENBERG, G, ‘Good Dads-Bad Dads: Two Faces of Fatherhood’ in AJ CHERLINE (ed), The Changing American Family and Public Policy (Washington, DC, The Urban Institute Press, 1988).
150. GADD, D, ‘Masculinities, Violence and Defended Psycho-Social Subjects’ (2000) 4 Theoretical Criminology 429.
151. GARFINKEL, I, DR MEYER and SS MCLANAHAN, ‘A Brief History of Child Support Policies in the United States’ in I GARFINKEL, SS MCLANAHAN, DR MEYER and JA SELTZER (eds), Fathers Under Fire: The Revolution in Child Support Enforcement (New York, Russell Sage, 1998).
152. GAVANAS, A, ‘The Fatherhood Responsibility Movement: The Centrality of Marriage, Work and Male Sexuality in Reconstructions of Masculinity and Fatherhood’ in B HOBSON (ed), Making Men into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002).
153. GELDOF, B, ‘The Real Love that Dare Not Speak its Name’ in A BAINHAM, B LINDLEY, M RICHARDS and L TRINDER (eds), Children and Their Families (Oxford, Hart, 2003).
154. GENOVESE, A, ‘States of Contempt and Equality: The Family Court, John Hirst and Feminism’ (2006) 21 Australian Feminist Studies (forthcoming).
155. GERSON, K, No Man’s Land: Men’s Changing Commitments to Family and Work (New York, Basic Books, 1993).
156. GIBB, F, ‘Fathers Winning Battle to have Custody Hearing in Public’ The Times, 10 January 2005.
157. GIDDENS, A, The Transformations of Intimacy (Cambridge, Polity, 1992).
158. GOFFMAN, E, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (New York, Harper Colophon, 1974).
159. GOLDBERG, H, The Hazards of Being Male: Surviving the Myth of Masculine Privilege (New York, Signet, 1976).
160. GOLLOP, M, A SMITH and N TAYLOR, ‘Children’s Involvement in Custody and Access Arrangements after Parental Separation’ (2000) 12 Child and Family Law Quarterly 383.
161. GORDON, M, ‘No Anti-Male Bias in the Tragic White Family Case’ Edmonton Journal, 7 April 2000.
162. GOULD, A, ‘Sweden: The Last Bastion of Social Democracy’ in V GEORGE and P TAYLOR-GOOBY (eds), European Welfare Policy: Squaring the Welfare Circle (Houndmills, Macmillan, 1996).
163. GOWARD, P, ‘Revision of Labour’, The Weekend Australian, 25-26 June 2005.
164. GRALL, T, Custodial Mothers and Fathers and their Child Support: 2001 (Current Population Reports, US Census Bureau, 2003).
165. GRAYCAR, R, ‘Law Reform by Frozen Chook: Family Law Reform for the New Millennium?' (2000) 24 Melbourne University Law Review 737.
166. GRBICH, C, ‘Male Primary Caregivers and Domestic Labour: Involvement or Avoidance?' (1995) 1(2) Journal of Family Studies 114.
167. GREATBATCH, D and R DINGWALL, ‘The Marginalization of Domestic Violence in Divorce Mediation’ (1999) 13(2) International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 174.
168. GRIFFITHS, M, Feminisms and the Self: The Web of Identity (London, Routledge, 1995).
169. GUSTAFSSON, G, M EDUARDS and M RÖNNBLOM, Towards a New Democratic Order? Women’s Organizing in Sweden in the 1990s (Stockholm, Publica, 1997).
170. HAGSTRÖM, C, Man blir pappa. Föräldraskap och maskulinitet i förändring (Man/one becomes a daddy. Parenthood and masculinity in change) (Lund, Nordic Academic Press, 1999).
171. HAND, K and V LEWIS, ‘Fathers’ Views on Family Life and Paid Work’ (2002) 61 Family Matters 26.
172. HANTRAIS, L and M-T LETABLIER, Families and Family Policies in Europe (Harlow, Longman, 1996).
173. HATTEN, W, L VINTER and R WILLIAMS, Dads on Dads: Needs and Expectations at Work and Home (Manchester, Equal Opportunities Commission, 2002).
174. HEARN, J, ‘A Crisis in Masculinity, or New Agendas for Men?' in S WALDBY (ed), New Agendas For Women (London, Macmillan, 1999).
175. HEARN, J and K PRINGLE with members of Critical Research on Men in Europe, European Perspectives on Men and Masculinities (Houndmills, Palgrave, 2006).
176. HEARN, J, K PRINGLE, U MÜLLER, E OLEKSY, E LATTU, J CHERNOVA, H FERGUSON, ØG HOLTER, V KOLGA, I NOVIKOVA, C VENTIMIGLIA, E OLSVIK and T TALLBERG, ‘Critical Studies on Men in Ten European Countries: (1) the State of Academic Research’ (2002) 4 Men and Masculinities 380.
177. HESTER, M and L HARNE, ‘Fatherhood, Children and Violence: Placing England in an International Context’ in S WATSON and L DOYAL (eds), Engendering Social Policy (Buckingham, Open University Press, 1999).
178. HINDESS, B and M SAWER, ‘Introduction’ in M SAWER and B HINDESS (eds), Us and Them: Anti-Elitism in Australia (Perth, API Network, 2004).
179. HIRST, J, ‘Court Rule Offensive to Families’ The Australian, 21 March 2005.
180. HIRST, J, ‘Kangaroo Court: Family Law in Australia’ (2005) 17 Quarterly Essay.
181. HOBSON, B, Making Men into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002).
182. HOBSON, B and D MORGAN, ‘Introduction: Making Men into Fathers’ in B HOBSON (ed), Making Men into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002).
183. HØJGAARD L, ‘Working Fathers-Caught in the Web of the Symbolic Order of Gender’ (1997) 40 Acta Sociologica 245.
184. HOLDEN, KC and PJ SMOCK, ‘The Economic Costs of Marital Dissolution: Why do Women Bear a Disproportionate Cost?' (1991) 17 Annual Review of Sociology 51.
185. HOLMBERG, C and C BENDER, Våld mot kvinnor-män i kris (Violence against women-men in crisis) (Stockholm, National Board ofHealth and Welfare, 1998).
186. HORIN, A and N JAMAL, ‘Push for Equal Custody a Win for Fathers’ Groups’, The Age, 8 December 2005.
187. HORN, WF, ‘Did You Say “Movement”?' in WF HORN, D BLANKENHORN and MB PEARLSTEIN (eds), The Fatherhood Movement: A Call to Action (Lanham, MD, Lexington Books, 1999).
188. HORN, WF, D BLANKENHORN and MB PEARLSTEIN, The Fatherhood Movement: A Call to Action (Lexington MD, Lexington Books, 1999).
189. HUDSON, P, ‘PM Orders Inquiry on Joint Custody’, The Age, 25 June 2003.
190. HUNT, J, Researching Contact (London, National Council for One Parent Families, 2003).
191. HUNTER, R, ‘Adversarial Mythologies: Policy Assumptions and Research Evidence in Family Law’ (2003) 30 Journal of Law and Society 156.
192. JAMES, A and A JAMES, ‘Pump up the Volume: Listening to Children in Separation and Divorce’ (1999) 6 Childhood 189.
193. JAMES, A, C JENKS and A PROUT, Theorizing Childhood (Cambridge, Polity, 1998).
194. JAMES, A and MPM RICHARDS, ‘Sociological Perspectives, Family Policy, Family Law and Children: Adult Thinking and Sociological Tinkering’ (1999) 21 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 23.
195. JENKS, C, Childhood (London, Routledge, 1996).
196. JOHNSON, SD, ‘Who Supports the Promise Keepers?' (2001) 61 Sociology of Religion 93.
197. KAGANAS, F and S DAY SCLATER, ‘Contact Disputes: Narrative Constructions of “Good Parents”' (2004) 12(1) Feminist Legal Studies 1.
198. KAGANAS, F and A DIDUCK, ‘Incomplete Citizens: Changing Images of Post-Separation Children’ (2004) 67(6) Modern Law Review 959.
199. KAGANAS, F and C PIPER, ‘Contact and Domestic Violence: The Winds of Change?' [2000] Family Law 630.
200. KAGANAS, F and C PIPER, ‘Shared Parenting-A 70% Solution?' [2002] 14 (4) Child and Family Law Quarterly 365.
201. KATZENSTEIN, M, Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminism into the Church and the Military (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1998).
202. KAYE, M and J TOLMIE, ‘Discoursing Dads: The Rhetorical Devices of Fathers’ Rights Groups’ (1998) 22 Melbourne University Law Review 162.
203. KAYE, M and J TOLMIE, ‘Fathers’ Rights Groups in Australia and their Engagement with Issues in Family Law’ (1998) 12(1) Australian Journal of Family Law 19.
204. KAYE, M and J TOLMIE, '“Lollies at a Children’s Party” and Other Myths: Violence, Protection Orders and Fathers’ Rights Groups’ (1998) 10(1) Current Issues in Criminal Justice 52.
205. KELLY, JB, ‘Changing Perspectives on Children’s Adjustment Following Divorce’ (2003) 10 Childhood 237.
206. KENEDY, RA, Fathers For Justice: The Rise of a New Social Movement in Canada as a Case Study of Collective Identity Formation (Ann Arbor, MI, Caravan Books, 2004).
207. KING, M, ‘Foreword’ in S DAY SCLATER and C PIPER (eds), Undercurrents of Divorce (Aldershot, Ashgate, 1999).
208. KING, M and C PIPER, How the Law Thinks About Children (2nd edn, Aldershot, Arena, 1995).
209. KLINTH, R, Göra pappa med barn. Svensk pappa-politik 1960-95 (Making daddy with child: Swedish daddy-politics 1960-95) (Umeå, Boréa, 2002).
210. KURKI-SUONIO, K, ‘Joint Custody as an Interpretation of the Best Interests of the Child in Critical and Comparative Perspective’ (2000) 14(3) International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 183.
211. LAING, M, ‘For the Sake of the Children: Preventing Reckless New Laws’ (1999) 16 Canadian Journal of Family Law 229.
212. LAROSSA, R, The Modernization of Fatherhood: A Social and Political History (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1997).
213. LASTER, K and P O’MALLEY, ‘Sensitive New-Age Laws: the Reassertion of Emotionality in Law’ (1996) 24 International Journal of the Sociology of Law 21.
214. LAVILLE, S, ‘Batman and Robin Quit Protest Group’ The Guardian, 9 June 2005.
215. LAWRENCE, S, ‘Feminism, Consequences, Accountability’ (2004) 42(4) Osgoode Hall Law Journal 583.
216. LESSARD, H, ‘Mothers, Fathers, and Naming: Reflections on the Law Equality Framework and Trociuk v British Columbia (Attorney General)' (2004) 16(1) Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 165.
217. LEWIS, C, A Man’s Place in the Home: Fathers and Families in the UK (York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2000).
218. LEWIS, C, A PAPACOSTA and J WARIN, Cohabitation, Separation and Fatherhood (York, YPS/Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2002).
219. LEWIS, J, ‘The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model Family’ (2001) 8 Social Politics 152.
220. LEWIS, J, The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relations (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2001).
221. LILJESTRÖM, R, Jämställdhetens villkor: män och kvinnor i dagens värld (The conditions of gender equality: Men and women today) (Stockholm, Sveriges Radio, 1968).
222. LU (Reports from the civil law committee) 12. Lagutskottets betänkande Vårdnad, boende umgänge (Custody, residence, contact) (Stockholm, Fritzes, 1997/98).
223. LUEPNITZ, DA, Child Custody (Lexington, MD, DC Heath and Company, 1982).
224. LUNDGREN, E, G HEIMER, J WESTERSTRAND and A-M KALLIOKOSKI, Captured Queen. Men’s Violence Against Women in ‘Equal’ Sweden-A National Survey (Umeå, Brottsofermyndigheten, 2002).
225. LUPTON, D and L BARCLAY, Constructing Fatherhood: Discourses and Experiences (London, Sage, 1997).
226. MCADAM, D and D RUCHT, ‘Cross National Diffusion of Social Movement Ideas’ (1993) 528 The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 56.
227. MCMILLAN, L, ‘Women’s Anti-Violence Organisations in Sweden and the UK’ in M ERIKSSON, A NENOLA and MM NILSEN (eds), Gender and Violence in the Nordic Countries. Report from a Conference in Køge, Denmark, 23-24 November 2001. TemaNord 2002: 545 (Copenhagen, Nordic Council of Ministers, 2002).
228. MACLEAN, M, ‘The Contribution of the International Research Community to UK Law Reform re Child Contact’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Research Committee of the Sociology of Law, ISA, Paris, 11-13 June 2005.
229. MACLEAN, M and J EEKELAAR, The Parental Obligation: A Study of Parenthood Across Households (Oxford, Hart, 1997).
230. MAGNUSSON, E, ‘Party-Political Rhetoric on Gender Equality in Sweden: The Uses of Uniformity and Heterogeneity’ (2000) 8 Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies/NORA 78.
231. MARSIGLIO, W, Fatherhood: Contemporary Theory, Research and Social Policy (London, Sage, 1995).
232. MASON, MA, The Custody Wars: Why Children are Losing the Legal Battle and What We Can Do About It (New York, Basic Books, 1999).
233. MASSON, J, ‘Parental Alienation Syndrome’ [2002] Family Law 568.
234. MATAS, R, ‘The Pain Behind a Suicide’ The Globe and Mail, 8 April 2000.
235. MAY, S, ‘Child Custody and Visitation’ (2001) 2 Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law 382.
236. MELLI, MS, ‘Guideline Review: Child Support and Time-sharing by Parents’ (1999) 33 Family Law Quarterly 219.
237. MELVILLE, A and R HUNTER, ‘As Everybody Knows: Countering Myths of Gender Bias in Family Law’ (2001) 1(1) Griffith Law Review 124.
238. MEN’S RIGHTS AGENCY, ‘Disenfranchised Fathers Still Unequal When it Comes to Child Custody’: http://www.mensrights.com.au/, posting dated 6 September 2004.
239. MESSNER, MA, Politics of Masculinities: Men in Movements (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1997).
240. MEYER, DS and N WHITTIER, ‘Social Movement Spillover’ (1994) 41 Social Problems 277.
241. MITCHELL, L, ‘Caught in a Crossfire’, The Age, 11 July 2005.
242. MOLONEY, L, T LOVE, T FISHER and S FERGUSON, ‘The Words to Say It-Clients’ Own Experiences of Family Mediation’ (1996) 10 Australian Journal of Family Law 53.
243. MOLONEY, L and J MCINTOSH, ‘Child-Responsive Practices in Australian Family Law: Past Problems and Future Directions’ (2004) 10 Journal of Family Studies 71.
244. MORGAN, D, Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies (Cambridge, Polity, 1996).
245. MOSS, P, Father Figures: Fathers in the Families of the 1990s (London, HMSO, 1995).
246. NAFFINE, N, Law and the Sexes (Sydney, Allen and Unwin, 1990).
247. NEALE, B, J FLOWERDEW and C SMART, ‘Drifting Towards Shared Residence?' [2003] Family Law 904.
248. NEALE, B and C SMART, ‘Experiments with Parenthood?' (1997) 31(2) Sociology 201.
249. NEALE, B and C SMART, ‘In Whose Best Interests? Theorising Family Life following Parental Separation or Divorce’ in S DAY SCLATER and C PIPER (eds), Undercurrents of Divorce (Aldershot, Ashgate, 1999).
250. NEAVE, M, ‘Resolving the Dilemma of Difference: A Critique of “The Role of Private Ordering in Family Law”' (1994) 44 University of Toronto Law Journal 97.
251. NEILSON, LC, ‘Demeaning, Demoralizing and Disenfranchising Divorced Dads: A Review of the Literature’ (1999) 31(3/4) Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 129.
252. NEILSON, LC, ‘Putting Revisions to the Divorce Act through a Family Violence Filter: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’ (2003) 20(1) Canadian Journal of Family Law 11.
253. NORDBORG, G and J NIEMI-KIESILÄINEN, ‘Women’s Peace: A Criminal Law Reform in Sweden’ in K NOUSIAINEN, Å GUNNARSSON, K LUNDSTRÖM and J NIEMI-KIESILÄINEN (eds), Responsible Selves. Women in the Nordic Legal Culture (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2001).
254. NORDBORG, G, ‘Children’s Peace? The Possibility to Protect Children by Means of Criminal Law and Family Law’ in M ERIKSSON, M HESTER, S KESKINEN and K PRINGLE (eds), Tackling Men’s Violence in Families. Nordic Issues and Dilemmas (Bristol, Policy Press, 2005).
255. NORDENFORS, G, Fadersrätt, kvinnofrid och barns säkerhet (Father-rights, women’s peace and children’s safety) (ROKS/Riksorganisationen för kvinnooch tjejjourer i Sverige, Stockholm, 1996).
256. NOUSIAINEN, K, ‘Introductory Remarks in Nordic Law and Gender Identities’ in K NOUSIAINEN, Å GUNNARSSON, K LUNDSTRÖM and J NIEMI-KIESILÄINEN (eds), Responsible Selves. Women in the Nordic Legal Culture (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2001).
257. NUSSBAUM, M, Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame and the Law (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2004).
258. NYGH, P, ‘The New Part VII-An Overview’ (1996) 10 Australian Journal of Family Law 4.
259. O’BRIEN, M, Shared Caring: Bringing Fathers into the Frame (Manchester, Equal Opportunities Commission, 1995).
260. O’DONOVAN, K, Family Law Matters (London, Pluto, 1993).
261. OLSON, M, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1965).
262. PARKE, R, Fatherhood (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press, 1996).
263. PARKINSON, P, J CASHMORE, and J SINGLE, Adolescents’ Views on the Fairness of Parenting and Financial Arrangements After Separation (Sydney, University of Sydney, 2003).
264. PARTON, N, Child Protection and Family Support (London, Routledge, 1997).
265. PEASE, B, Recreating Men: Postmodern Masculinity Politics (London, Sage, 2000).
266. PHILLIPS, A, ‘Most Fathers get Justice’ The Guardian, 13 October 2004.
267. PHILLIPS, M, The Sex-Change Society: Feminised Britain and the Neutered Male (London, The Social Market Foundation, 1999).
268. PIPER, C, The Responsible Parent (Hemel Hempsted, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993).
269. PIPER, C, ‘Divorce Reform and the Image of the Child’ (1996) 23(3) Journal of Law and Society 364.
270. PIPER, C, ‘Assumptions About Children’s Best Interests’ (2000) 22 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 261.
271. POTTER, J, Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction (London, Sage, 1996).
272. PRINGLE, K, Men, Masculinities and Social Welfare (London, UCL Press, 1995).
273. PRINGLE, K, Children and Social Welfare in Europe (Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 1998).
274. PRINGLE, K, Final Report to the ESRC on project R000223551 (2002) on REGARD DATABASE website: http://www.regard.ac.uk/cgi-bin/regardng/showReports.pl?ref=R000223551
275. PRINGLE, K, ‘Hvorfor har vi brug for flere mandlige pædagoger?-Internationale synspunkter’ (Why do we need more men as pedagogues?-International perspectives) (2005) 33 VERA 30.
276. PRINGLE, K, ‘Neglected Issues in Swedish Child Protection Policy and Practice: Age, Ethnicity and Gender’ in M ERIKSSON, M HESTER, S KESKINEN and K PRINGLE (eds), Tackling Men’s Violence in Families. Nordic Issues and Dilemmas (Bristol, Policy Press, 2005).
277. PROP (Swedish government white paper) 1994/95: 224 Barns rätt att komma till tals (Children’s right to voice) (Stockholm, Fritzes).
278. PROP (Swedish government white paper) 1997/98: 7 Vårdnad, boende, umgänge (Custody, living, rights of access) (Stockholm, Fritzes).
279. PROP (Swedish government white paper) 1998/99: 133 Särskild företrädare för barn (Special representative for children) (Stockholm, Fritzes).
280. PROP (Swedish government white paper) 2005/06: 99 Nya vårdnadsregler (New custody rules) (Stockholm, Fritzes).
281. PRYOR, J and B RODGERS, Children in Changing Families: Life after Parental Separation (Oxford, Blackwell, 2001).
282. QUICKE, A and K ROBINSON, ‘Keeping the Promise of the Moral Majority: A Historical Critical Comparison of the Promise Keepers and the Christian Coalition, 1989-1998' in DS CLAUSSEN (ed), The Promise Keepers: Essays on Masculinity and Christianity (Jefferson, NJ, McFarland and Company, 2000).
283. REECE, H, ‘The Paramountcy Principle: Consensus or Construct’ (1996) 49 Current Legal Problems 267.
284. REECE, H, Divorcing Responsibly (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2003).
285. REPUTATION INTELLIGENCE, F4J Heralds a New Era in Political Campaigning: Media Report (London, Reputation Intelligence, 2004).
286. RHOADES, H, ‘Posing as Reform? The Case of the Family Law Reform Act’ (2000) 14(2) Australian Journal of Family Law 142.
287. RHOADES, H, ‘The “Non Contact Mother”: Reconstructions ofMotherhood in the Era of the New Father’ (2002) 16 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 72.
288. RHOADES, H, ‘The Rise and Rise of Shared Parenting Laws: A Critical Reflection’ (2002) 19(1) Canadian Journal of Family Law 75.
289. RHOADES, H, ‘Contact Enforcement and Parenting Programs-Policy Aims in Confusion?' (2004) 16 Child and Family Law Quarterly 1.
290. RHOADES, H and SB BOYD, ‘Reforming Custody Laws: A Comparative Study’ (2004) 18 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 119.
291. RHOADES, H, R GRAYCAR and M HARRISON, The Family Law Reform Act 1995: The First Three Years (University of Sydney/Family Court of Australia, 2000).
292. ROBSON, K, Wrapped in the Flag of the Child: Post-Divorce Parenting Experiences in an Era of Guidelines and Privatization (PhD Thesis, Department of Sociology, Queen’s University, defended 11 November 2005).
293. RUSSELL, G and L BOWMAN, Work and Family: Current Thinking, Research and Practice (Department of Family and Community Services, 2000).
294. SAINSBURY, D, Gender and Welfare State Regimes (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999).
295. SANDBERG, JF and SL HOFFERTH, ‘Changes in Children’s Time with Parents: United States, 1981-1997' (2001) 38 Demography 423.
296. SAWER, M, Populism and Public Choice: The Construction of Women as a ‘Special Interest’, paper presented at the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 29 September-1 October 2003.
297. SAWER, M, ‘Populism and Public Choice in Australia and Canada: Turning Equality-Seekers into “Special Interests”' in M Sawer and B Hindess (eds), Us and Them: Anti-Elitism in Australia (Perth, API Network, 2004).
298. SAWER, M and B HINDESS, Us and Them: Anti-Elitism in Australia (Perth, API Network, 2004).
299. SAYER, LC, SM BIANCHI and JP ROBINSON, ‘Are Parents Investing Less Time in Children?' (2004) 110 American Journal of Sociology 1.
300. SCALMER, S and MGOOT, ‘Elites Constructing Elites: News Limited’s Newspapers 1996-2002' in M SAWER and B HINDESS (eds), Us and Them: Anti-Elitism in Australia (Perth, API Network, 2004).
301. SCB (Statistics Sweden), Barn och deras familjer 2001 (Children and their families 2001) (Stockholm and Örebro, Statistiska centralbyrån, 2003).
302. SCHIRATZKI, J, Vårdnad och vårdnadstvister (Custody and custody disputes) (Stockholm, Nordstedts, 1997).
303. SCLATER, SD and F KAGANAS, ‘Contact: Mothers, Welfare and Rights’ in A BAINHAM, B LINDLEY, M RICHARDS and L TRINDER (eds), Children and Their Families (Oxford, Hart, 2003).
304. SEVENHUIJSEN, S, Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations about Justice, Morality and Politics (London, Routledge, 1998).
305. SEWELL, WH, ‘A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation’ (1992) 98 American Journal of Sociology 1.
306. SHARED PARENTING COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA, ‘Is the Family Court a Political or a Judicial Institution?', Media Release, 30 October 2002.
307. SHARED PARENTING COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA, ‘Federal Government Recognises Shared Parenting is the Way Forward for Australian Children of Divorce’, Press Release, 18 November 2002.
308. SHARED PARENTING COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA, ‘Government Shared Parenting Announcement a Courageous and Small Step Forward’, Media Release, 30 July 2004.
309. SHARED PARENTING COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA, ‘Protecting the Child’s Rights is Paramount to their Welfare and Best Interests’, Media Release, 30 July 2004.
310. SHARED PARENTING COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA, ‘Howard’s Family Law Amendments a Cruel Failure’, Media Release, 24 June 2005.
311. SHARED PARENTING COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA, ‘Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Bill 2005: The Fourth Pillar to the Family Reform Measures is a Solid Piece of Work’, Media Release, 9 December 2005.
312. SHELDON, S, ‘Fragmenting Fatherhood: The Regulation of Reproductive Technologies’ (2005) 68(4) Modern Law Review 523.
313. SIMONS, M, ‘Ties that Bind’ (2005) 8 Griffith Review 13.
314. SINGER, A, Föräldraskap i rättslig belysning (Parenthood according to the law) (Uppsala, Iustus, 2000).
315. SMART, C, ‘Feminism and Law: Some Problems of Analysis and Strategy’ (1986) 14 International Journal of the Sociology of Law 109.
316. SMART, C, Feminism and the Power of Law (London, Routledge, 1989).
317. SMART, C, ‘The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody’ (1991) 18 Journal of Law and Society 485.
318. SMART, C, ‘Losing the Struggle for Another Voice-The Case of Family Law’ (1995) 18 Dalhousie Law Journal 173.
319. SMART, C, ‘Wishful thinking and harmful tinkering? Sociological Reflections on Family Policy’ (1997) (26) 3 Journal of Social Policy 1.
320. SMART, C, ‘The “New” Parenthood: Fathers and Mothers After Divorce’ in E SILVA and C SMART (eds), The New Family? (London, Sage, 1999).
321. SMART, C, ‘From Children’s Shoes to Children’s Voices’ (2002) 40 Family Court Review 305.
322. SMART, C, ‘Introduction: New Perspectives on Childhood and Divorce’ (2003) 10(2) Childhood 123.
323. SMART, C, ‘Towards an Understanding of Family Change: Gender Conflict and Children’s Citizenship’ (2003) 17 Australian Journal of Family Law 20.
324. SMART, C, ‘Equal Shares: Rights for Fathers or Recognition for Children?' (2004) 24(4) Critical Social Policy 484.
325. SMART, C, ‘The Ethic of Justice Fights Back: Family Law and the Rise of the New Paternity’, paper presented at the Canadian Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, ‘Law’s Empire’, 26-29 June 2005.
326. SMART, C, V MAY, A WADE and C FURNISS, Residence and Contact Disputes in Court: Research Report 6/2003 (London, Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2003).
327. SMART, C and B NEALE, ‘Arguments Against Virtue: Must Contact be Enforced?' [1997] Family Law 332.
328. SMART, C and B NEALE, ‘Good Enough Morality? Divorce and Postmodernity’ (1997) 17(4) Critical Social Policy 3.
329. SMART, C and B NEALE, Family Fragments? (Cambridge, Polity, 1999).
330. SMART, C and B NEALE, '“I Hadn’t Really Thought About It”: New Identities/New Fatherhoods’ in J SEYMOUR and P BAGGULEY (eds), Relating Intimacies: Power and Resistance (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 1999).
331. SMART, C and B NEALE, '“It’s My Life Too”-Children’s Perspectives on Post-Divorce Parenting’ [2000] Family Law 163.
332. SMART, C, B NEALE and A WADE, The Changing Experience of Childhood: Families and Divorce (Cambridge, Polity, 2001).
333. SMART, C and P STEPHENS, Cohabitation Breakdown (York, Family Policy Studies Centre/Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2000).
334. SMEATON, D and A MARSH, Maternity and Paternity Benefits: Survey of Parents 2005: Employment Relations Research Series No 50 (London, Department of Trade and Industry, 2006).
335. SMITH, B, NJ TAYLOR and P TAPP, ‘Rethinking Children’s Involvement in Decision-Making after Parental Separation’ (2003) 10 Childhood 201.
336. SMOCK, PJ, ‘Gender and the Short-Run Economic Consequences of Marital Disruption’ (1994) 73 Social Forces 243.
337. SMYTH, B Parent-Child Contact and Post-Separation Parenting Arrangements (Research Report No 9, Australian Institute of Family Studies, 2004).
338. SOCIALSTYRELSEN, Barn i fokus-projektet. Slutrapport (The Children in focusproject. Final report) (Stockholm, Socialstyrelsen, 1996).
339. SOMMERS, CH, Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women (New York, Simon and Schuster, 1994).
340. SOU (Swedish Public Investigations) 1995: 60 Kvinnofrid. Kvinnovåldskommissionens huvudbetänkande (Women’s Peace.Main report from the commission on violence against women) (Stockholm, Fritzes, 1995).
341. SOU (Swedish Public Investigations) 1995: 79 Vårdnad, boende, umgänge. Vårdnadstvistutredningen (Custody, residence, contact. The inquiry on custody disputes) (Stockholm, Fritzes, 1995).
342. SOU (Swedish Public Investigations) 1998: 31 Det gäller livet-Stöd och vård till barn och ungdomar med psykiska problem (Concerning life-Support to and care of children and young people with psychiatric problems) (Stockholm, Fritzes, 1998).
343. SOU (Swedish Public Investigations) 2000: 77 Omhändertagen. Samhällets ansvar för utsatta barn och unga. Betänkande från LVU-utredningen (Taken into care. Society’s responsibility for children and young people at risk. Report from the inquiry on the law on young people in care) (Stockholm, Fritzes, 2000).
344. SOU (Swedish Public Investigations) 2001: 14 Sexualbrotten-ett ökat skydd för den sexuella integriteten och angränsande frågor. Betänkande från 1998 års Sexualbrottskommitté (Sexual crimes-increased protection of the sexual integrity and associated issues. Report from the 1998 Committee on sexual crimes) (Stockholm, Fritzes, 2001).
345. SOU (Swedish Public Investigations) 2001: 72. Barnmisshandel. Att förebygga och åtgärda (Child abuse-Prevention and protection. Final Report from the parliamentary committee against child abuse) (Stockholm, Fritzes, 2001).
346. SOU (Swedish Public Investigations) 2005: 43 Vårdnad-Boende-Umgänge. Barnets bästa, föräldrars ansvar. Betänkande från 2002 års Vårdnadskommitté (Custody, residence, contact. The best interests of children, parents’ responsibility. Report from the 2002 parliamentary committee on custody) (Stockholm, Fritzes, 2005).
347. SPELMAN, E, Inessential Woman (Boston, Beacon Press, 1990).
348. STACEY, J, ‘Dada-ism in the 1990s: Getting Past Baby Talk About Fatherlessness’ in CR DANIELS (ed), Lost Fathers: The Politics of Fatherlessness in America (New York, St Martin’s Press, 1998).
349. STATUS OF WOMEN CANADA, Setting the Stage for the Next Century: The Federal Plan for Gender Equality (Ottawa, Status of Women Canada, 1995).
350. STONE, L New Directions in Anthropological Kinship (Lanham, MD and Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield, 2001).
351. STRAUSS, A and J CORBIN, Basics of Grounded Theory: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990).
352. TARROW, S, ‘Modular Collective Action and the Rise of the Social Movement: Why the French Revolution Was Not Enough’ (1993) 21 Politics and Society 69.
353. TARROW, S, Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics (New York, Cambridge University Press, 1994).
354. TEUBNER, G, ‘How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law’ (1989) 23 Law & Society Review 727.
355. TORR, J, Is there a Father in the House: A Handbook for Health and Social Care Professionals (Oxford, Radcliffe Medical Press, 2003).
356. TRONTO, JC, ‘Women and Caring: What Can Feminists Learn about Morality from Caring?' in A JAGGAR and S BORDO (eds), Gender, Body, Knowledge (Newark, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1989).
357. TRONTO, JC, Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care (London, Routledge, 1993).
358. VAN TIGGELEN, J, ‘Dads’ Army’, The Age Good Weekend Magazine, 21 May 2005.
359. VENOHR, J and RG WILLIAMS, ‘The Implementation and Periodic Review of State Child Support Guidelines’ (1999) 33 Family Law Quarterly 7.
360. WADE, A, B NEALE and C SMART, The Changing Experience of Childhood: Families and Divorce (Cambridge, Polity, 2001).
361. WADE, A and C SMART, Facing Family Change: Children’s Circumstances, Strategies and Resources (York, YPS/Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2002).
362. WALLER, M, My Baby’s Father: Unmarried Parents and Paternal Responsibility (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 2002).
363. WARIN, J, Y SOLOMON, C LEWIS and W LANGFORD, Fathers, Work and Family Life (York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation/Family Policy Studies Centre, 1999).
364. WEBB, N and L MOLONEY, ‘Child-Focused Development Programs for Family Dispute Professionals: Recent Steps in the Evolution of Family Dispute Resolution Strategies in Australia’ (2003) 9 Journal of Family Studies 23.
365. WENDT-HÖJER, M, Rädslans politik. Våld och sexualitet i den svenska demokratin (The Politics of fear. Violence and sexuality in the Swedish democracy) (Malmö, Liber, 2002).
366. WESTON, R, L QU and G SORIANO, ‘Implications of Men’s Extended Work Hours for their Personal and Marital Happiness’ (2002) 61 Family Matters 18.
367. WILLIAMS, B, ‘Systems Failing Fathers: A Fatherless Society in Waiting’, Address to the Lone Fathers Association National Conference, 22-23 June 2005, Canberra.
368. WILLIAMS, C, ‘Parental Alienation Syndrome’ [2002] Family Law 410.
369. WILLIAMS, GI and RH WILLIAMS, ‘All We Want is Equality: Rhetorical Framing in the Fathers’ Rights Movement’ in J BEST (ed), Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems (New York, Aldine de Gruyter, 1995).
370. WROE, R, ‘Judge Claims Intimidation in Row over Child Custody’, The Age, 2 December 2003.