Family Trees for Legal Systems: Towards a Contemporary Approach

Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 359-376

  Örücü, Esin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85186290200     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. R David and JEC Brierley, Major Legal Systems in the World Today, An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law 3rd ed, (Stevens & Sons, London, 1985), p 21.
2. K Zweigert and H Kötz, An Introduction to Comparative Law, Translated by T Weir 3rd ed, (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998), pp 63-67.
3. M Bogdan, Comparative Law (Goteborg, Kluwer Tano, 1994), pp 82-91.
4. VV Palmer, Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
5. B de Sousa Santos, Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation, 2nd ed, (Butterworths, LexisNexis, 2002), pp 191-3.
6. J Smits, The Making of European Private Law: Towards a Ius Commune Europaeum as a Mixed Legal System, (Metro, Maastricht, 2002).
7. A Malmström, ‘The System of Legal Systems, Notes on the Classification in Comparative Law’, (1969) 13 Scandinavian Studies in Law, 127;
8. G Eörsi, ‘Convergence in Civil law?', in Szabo & Peteri (eds) A Socialist Approach to Comparative Law (Budapest, Leyden, 1977) pp 45-94;
9. G Eörsi, ‘On the Problem of the Division of Legal Systems’, in M Rotondi (ed) Inchieste di diritto comparato 2. Buts et methodes du droit compare (New York, Padova, 1973), pp 179-210.
10. E Örücü, ‘Mixed and Mixing Systems: A Conceptual Search’, in E Örücü, E Attwooll and S Coyle (eds) Studies in Legal Systems: Mixed and Mixing (London, Kluwer Law International, 1996), p 344.
11. E Örücü, ‘An Exercise on the Internal Logic of Legal Systems’. (1987) 7 Legal Studies, 310.
12. E Örücü, ‘Law as Transposition’, (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 205.
13. E Hondius, ‘The Supremacy of Western Law’ in L de Ligt. J de Ruiter, E Slob, JM Tevel, M van de Vrugt & LC Winkel (eds) Viva Vox Iuris Romani: Essays in Honour of Johannes Emil Spruit, (Amsterdam, JC Giben Publisher, 2002) pp 337-42
14. E Örücü, ‘Comparatists and Extraordinary Places’, Chapter 13 in P Legrand & R Munday (eds) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003) 467-89.
15. A Watson, The Making of the Civil Law (London, Harvard University Press, 1981), p 4.
16. M Bernal, Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilisation, 2 vols, (New Jersey, Rutgers University Press, 1987, 1991).
17. HP Glenn, Legal Traditions of the World (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000).
18. E Örücü, Critical Comparative Law: Considering Paradoxes for Legal Systems in Transition, (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Rechtvergelijking No: 59, Deventer, Kluwer, 1999) pp 80-118.
19. E Clive, ‘Scottish Family Law’ in JP Grant (ed) Independence and Devolution: The Legal Implications for Scotland (Edinburgh, Green and Son, 1976) 162 at p 173.
20. I Ward, ‘The limits of Comparativism: Lessons from UK-EC Integration’, (1995) 2 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 23, at p 31.
21. M Aitkenhead, N Burrows, R Jagtenberg & E Örücü, Law and lawyers in European integration, (Rotterdam, Erasmus University No: 43, 1988), p 34.
22. RB, Schlesinger, ‘The Past and the Future of Comparative Law’, (1995) 43 American Journal of Comparative Law, 477.
23. VGD Curran, ‘Dealing in Difference: Comparative Law’s Potential for Broadening Legal Perspective’, (1998) 46 American Journal of Comparative Law, 657
24. NV Demleitner, ‘Challenge, Opportunity and Risk: An Era of Change in Comparative Law’, (1998) 46 American Journal of Comparative Law, 647.
25. E Örücü, ‘Unde Venit, Quo Tendit Comparative Law’, in A Harding & E Örücü (eds) Comparative Law in the 21st Century (London, Kluwer Law International, 2002), pp 9-10.
26. A Watson, ‘Legal Transplants and Law Reform’ (1976) 92 Law Quarterly Review, 61 at p 79
27. W Ewald, ‘Comparative Jurisprudence (II) The Logic of legal Transplants (1995) 43 American Journal of Comparative Law, 489.
28. R Martin, ‘Diverging Common Law-Invercargill goes to the Privy Council’, (1997) 60 Modern Law Review, 94.
29. W Twining, Globalization and Legal Theory (London, Butterworths, 2000), pp 136-41.
30. P Legrand, ‘Against a European Civil Code’ (1997) 60 Modern Law Review, 44.
31. M van Hoecke & F Ost, ‘Legal Doctrine in Crisis: Towards a European Legal Science’ (1998) 18 Legal Studies, 197 at pp 211-15.