Comparatists and extraordinary places

Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 467-490

  Örücü, Esin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927010081     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511522260.013     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. David S. Berry, ‘Interpreting Rights and Culture: Extending Law’s Empire’, (1998) 4 Res Publica 3, p. 14.
2. Vivian G. Curran, ‘Dealing in Difference: Comparative Law’s Potential for Broadening Legal Perspective’, (1998) 46 Am. J. Comp. L. 657.
3. Nora V. Demleitner, ‘Challenge, Opportunity and Risk: An Era of Change in Comparative Law’, (1998) 46 Am. J. Comp. L. 647.
4. Pierre Legrand, ‘The Impossibility of “Legal Transplants”’, (1997) 4 Maastricht J. Eur. & Comp. L. 111.
5. Rodolfo Sacco, ‘Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law’, (1991) 39 Am. J. Comp. L. 1
6. Alan Watson, Legal Transplants, 2d ed. (Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1993).
7. Gunther Teubner, ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergencies’, (1998) 61 Modern L.R. 17.
8. John W. F. Allison, A Continental Distinction in the Common Law(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), p. 16.
9. Esin Örücü, ‘Law as Transposition’, (2002) 51 Int. & Comp. L.Q. 205.
10. Esin Örücü, ‘A Theoretical Framework for Transfrontier Mobility of Law’, in R. Jagtenberg, id. and A. de Roo (eds.), Transfrontier Mobility of Law(The Hague: Kluwer, 1995), pp. 5–8.
11. Piergiuseppe Monateri, ‘The “Weak” Law: Contaminations and Legal Cultures’, in Italian National Reports to the XVth International Congress of Comparative Law, Bristol, 1998(Milan: Giuffrè, 1998), p. 83.
12. Esin Örücü, ‘An Exercise on the Internal Logic of Legal Systems’, (1987) 7 Leg. Stud. 310.
13. Sally Falk Moore, Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach(London: Routledge & Kegan Paul: 1978).
14. Social Facts and Fabrications: ‘Customary’ Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).
15. Kalman Kulcsar, Modernisation and Law(Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1992), p. 18.
16. Esin Örücü, ‘Mixed and Mixing Systems: A Conceptual Search’, in id., Elspeth Attwooll and Sean Coyle (eds.), Studies in Legal Systems: Mixed and Mixing (London: Kluwer, 1996), p. 351.
17. Gianmaria Ajani, ‘The Role of Comparative Law in the Adoption of New Codifications’, in Italian National Reports to the XVth International Congress of Comparative Law, Bristol, 1998(Milan: Giuffrè, 1998), p. 70.
18. Paul Varul and Heiki Pisuke, ‘Louisiana’s Contribution to the Estonian Civil Code’, (1999) 73 Tulane L.R. 1027.
19. ‘La circulation des mod`eles juridiques dans le droit post-socialiste’, Rev. int. dr. comp., 1994, p. 1087.
20. Jan M. Smits, ‘Systems Mixing and in Transition: Import and Export of Legal Models – The Dutch Experience’, in Ewoud H. Hondius (ed.), Netherlands Reports to the Fifteenth International Congress of Comparative Law(Antwerpen: Intersentia, 1998), p. 55.
21. Roger Scruton, ‘The Reform of Law in Eastern Europe’, (1991) 1 Tilburg Foreign L.R. 7, p. 8.
22. Bogumila Pulchalska-Tych and Michael Salter, ‘Comparing Legal Cultures of East Europe: The Need for a Dialectical Analysis’, (1996) 16 Leg. Stud. 157.
23. Esin Örücü, Critical Comparative Law: Considering Paradoxes for Legal Systems in Transition(Deventer: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 118–26.
24. Akmal Saidov, ‘Le droit comparé et le droit ouzbek’, Rev. int. dr. comp., 1996, p. 481.
25. John H. Merryman, ‘The French Deviation’, (1996) 44 Am. J. Comp. L. 109, p. 109.
26. Esin Örücü, ‘The Impact of European Law on the Ottoman Empire and Turkey’, in Wolfgang J. Mommsen and Jan A. de Moor (eds.), European Expansion and Law(Oxford: Berg, 1992), pp. 39–58.
27. Elisabetta Grande, ‘Preface’, in id. (ed.), Transplants Innovation and Legal Tradition in the Horn of Africa(Trento: L’Harmattan, 1995), p. 14.
28. Chenguang Wang and Guobin Zhu, ‘A Tale of Two Legal Systems: The Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law in Hong Kong’, Rev. int. dr. comp., 1999, p. 917.
29. Derry Wong, ‘Language Discrimination and the Hong Kong Jury’, (1995) 1 J. Chinese & Comp. L. 153.
30. D.W. Ling, ‘Confucianism and English Common Law: A Chinese Lawyer’s Observations’, (1995) 1 J. Chinese & Comp. L. 72.
31. Alan Watson, ‘Aspects of Reception of Law’, (1996) 44 Am. J. Comp. L. 335, p. 335.
32. Gianmaria Ajani, ‘By Chance and Prestige: Legal Transplants in Russia and Eastern Europe’, (1995) 43 Am. J. Comp. L. 93.
33. Ugo Mattei, ‘Why the Wind Changed: Intellectual Leadership in Western Law’, (1994) 42 Am. J. Comp. L. 195.
34. Ugo Mattei, ‘Efficiency in Legal Transplants: An Essay in Comparative Law and Economics’, (1994) 14 Int. R. L. & Econ. 3, pp. 6–8.
35. Alan Watson, ‘Legal Transplants and Law Reform’, (1976) 92 L.Q.R. 79, p. 81.
36. William Ewald, ‘Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants’, (1995) 43 Am. J. Comp. L. 489.
37. Ian Ward, ‘The Limits of Comparativism: Lessons from UK–EC Integration’, (1995) 2 Maastricht J. Eur. & Comp. L. 23, p. 31.
38. Eric M. Clive, ‘Scottish Family Law’, in John P. Grant (ed.), Independence and Devolution: The Legal Implications for Scotland(Edinburgh: Green, 1976), p. 173.
39. Luigi Moccia, ‘Historical Overview on the Origins and Attitudes of Comparative Law’, in Bruno De Witte and Caroline Forder (eds.), The Common Law of Europe and the Future of Legal Education(Deventer: Kluwer, 1992), p. 619.
40. Rudolf B. Schlesinger, ‘The Past and Future of Comparative Law’, (1995) 43 Am. J. Comp. L. 477, p. 477.
41. Bruno De Witte, ‘The Convergence Debate’, (1996) 3 Maastricht J. Eur. & Comp. L. 105.
42. Esin Örücü, ‘The United Kingdom as an Importer and Exporter of Legal Models in the Context of Reciprocal Influences and Evolving Legal Systems’, in John Bridge (ed.), UK Law for the Millennium, 2d ed. (London: U.K.N.C.C.L., 2000), pp. 206–47.
43. Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kötz, An Introduction to Comparative Law, 3d ed. transl. by Tony Weir (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 17.
44. Bernhard Großfeld, The Strength and Weakness of Comparative Law, transl. by Tony Weir (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 47.
45. Werner F. Menski, Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa(London: Platinium, 2000), pp. 1–49
46. Volkmar Gessner, ‘Global Legal Interaction and Legal Cultures’, (1994) 7 Ratio Juris 132.
47. Ugo Mattei, ‘An Opportunity Not to Be Missed: The Future of Comparative Law in the United States’, (1998) 46 Am. J. Comp. L. 709, p. 715
48. Anthony Ogus, ‘Competition Between National Legal Systems: A Contribution of Economic Analysis to Comparative Law’, (1999) 48 Int. & Comp. L.Q. 405, pp. 405–6