NATO’S NEW MISSION: Projecting Stability in a Post–Cold War World

Nato’s New Mission: Projecting Stability in a Post–Cold War World

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-210

  Moore, Rebecca R ^a  

^a and Exercise Science   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85184083189     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (99)

1. Albright, Madeleine. ‘‘NATO Expansion: Beginning the Process of Advice and Consent,’’ Statement before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, U.S. Department of State Dispatch, October 17, 1997.
2. Asmus, Ronald D. Opening NATO’s Door: How the Alliance Remade Itself for a New Era. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.
3. Asmus, Ronald D. ‘‘Rebuilding the Atlantic Alliance.’’ Foreign Affairs 82, no. 5(September/ October 2003): 28–40.
4. Asmus, Ronald D., Larry Diamond, Mark Leonard, and Michael McFaul. ‘‘A Transatlantic Strategy to Promote Democratic Development in the Broader Middle East.’’ The Washington Quarterly 28, no. 2 (Spring 2005): 7–21.
5. Asmus, Ronald D., Richard L. Kugler, and F. Stephen Larrabee, ‘‘Building a New NATO.’’ Foreign Affairs 72, no. 4 (September/October 1993): 28–40.
6. Axworth, Lloyd. ‘‘NATO’s New Security Vocation.’’ NATO Review 47, no. 4 (Winter 1999).
7. Baker, James. ‘‘A New Europe: A New Atlanticism: Architecture for a New Era.’’ (Current Policy no. 1233), December 12, 1989.
8. Baker, James. The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War and Peace, 1989–1992. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1995.
9. Bebler, Anton, ‘‘The Evolution of Civil-Military Relations in Central and Eastern Europe.’’ NATO Review 42, no. 4 (August 1994): 28–32.
10. Berman, Ilan. ‘‘The New Battleground: Central Asia and the Caucasus.’’ The Washington Quarterly 28, no. 1 (Winter 2004–2005): 59–69.
11. Binnendijk, Hans, and Richard Kugler. Dual Track Transformation for the Atlantic Alliance. Washington, DC: Center for Technology and National Security Policy, November 2003.
12. Binnendijk, Hans, and Richard Kugler. Needed—A NATO Stabilization and Reconstruction Force. Washington, DC: Center for Technology and National Security Policy, September 2004.
13. Blank, Stephen J. Prague, NATO and European Security. U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, April 17, 1996.
14. Booth, Ken, ed.The Kosovo Tragedy: The Human Rights Dimensions. Portland, OR: Frank Cass, 2001.
15. Bring, Ove. ‘‘Should NATO Take the Lead in Formulating a Doctrine on Humanitarian Intervention?’’ NATO Review 47, no. 3 (Autumn 1999): 24–27.
16. Buckley, William Joseph. Contending Voices on Balkan Interventions. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2000.
17. Buergenthal, Thomas. ‘‘Copenhagen: A Democratic Manifesto.’’ World Affairs 153, no.1(Summer 1990): 5–8.
18. Bush, George. ‘‘Proposals for a Free and Peaceful Europe.’’ Speech at Mainz, Federal Republic of Germany (Current Policy no. 1179), May 31, 1989.
19. Bush, George. ‘‘Security Strategy for the 1990s.’’ Address at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy (Current Policy no. 1178), May 24, 1989.
20. Bush, George, and Brent Scowcroft. A World Transformed. New York: Knopf, 1998. Buzan, Barry, Morten Kelstrup, Perre Lemaitre, Elzbieta Tomer, and Ole Waever. The European Security Order Recast: Scenarios of the Post–Cold War Era. London: Pinter Publishers, 1990.
21. Daalder, Ivo H., Nicole Gnesotto, and Philip Gordon, eds. Crescent of Crisis: U.S.–European Strategy for the Greater Middle East.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2006.
22. Daalder, Ivo H., and Michael E. O’Hanlon. Winning Ugly: NATO’s War to Save Kosovo. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2000.
23. Daalder, Ivo, and James Goldgeier. ‘‘Global NATO.’’ Foreign Affairs 85, no. 5 (September/October 2006): 105–113.
24. de Hoop Scheffer, Jaap. ‘‘Projecting Stability.’’ Speech by the Secretary General, Brussels, May 17, 2004.
25. Deutsch, Karl W. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. de Wijk, Rob. NATO on the Brink of the New Millennium: The Battle for Consensus. London: Brassey’s, 1997.
27. de Wijk. ‘‘Towards a New Political Strategy for NATO.’’ NATO Review 2 (Summer 1998).
28. Drozdiak, William, Geoffrey Kemp, Flynt L. Leverett, Christopher J. Makins, and Bruce Stokes. Partners in Frustration: Europe the United States and the Broader Middle East. Atlantic Council Policy Paper. Washington, DC: The Atlantic Council, September 2004.
29. Duffield, John. ‘‘NATO’s Function after the Cold War.’’ Political Science Quarterly 109, no. 5 (Winter 1994/95): 763–87.
30. Evans, Gareth, and Mohamed Sahoun. ‘‘The Responsibility to Protect.’’ Foreign Affairs 81, no. 6 (November/December 2002): 99–110.
31. FAES (Fundacion Para el Analisis y los Estudios Scoiales). NATO: An Alliance for Freedom: How to Transform the Atlantic Alliance to Effectively Defend our Freedom and Democracies. 2005.
32. Feith, Douglas J. ‘‘NATO’s Transformation: Security Freedom for Future Generations.’’ U.S. Department of State, U.S. Foreign Policy Agenda 7, no. 1 (March 2002).
33. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. ‘‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.’’ International Organization 52, no. 4 (Autumn, 1998): 887–917.
34. Flanagan, Stephen J. ‘‘NATO and Central and Eastern Europe: From Liaison to Security Partnership.’’ The Washington Quarterly (Spring 1992): 141–51.
35. Forster, Anthony, and William Wallace. ‘‘What Is NATO For?’’ Survival 43, no. 4 (2001): 107–22.
36. Garton Ash, Timothy. ‘‘Europe’s Endangered Liberal Order.’’ Foreign Affairs 77, no. 2 (March/April 1998): 51–65.
37. Garton Ash, Timothy. Free World: America, Europe and the Surprising Future of the West. New York: Random House, 2004.
38. Gheciu, Alexandra. NATO in the ‘‘New Europe’’: The Politics of International Socialization after the Cold War. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.
39. Glennon, Michael J. ‘‘The New Interventionsism.’’ Foreign Affairs 78, no. 3 (May/June1999): 2–7.
40. Goldgeier, James M. ‘‘Not When but Who,’’ NATO Review, no. 1 (Spring 2002).
41. Goldgeier, James M. Not Whether but When: The U.S. Decision to Enlarge NATO.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999.
42. Gordon, Philip, ‘‘NATO After 11 September.’’ Survival 43, no. 4 (Winter 2001–2002): 89–106.
43. Gordon, Philip, and James Steinberg. NATO Enlargement: Moving Forward. Brookings Policy Brief, no. 90.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, December 2001.
44. Grossman, Marc. ‘‘21st Century NATO: New Capabilities, New Members, New Relationships,’’ U.S. Department of State, U.S. Foreign Policy Agenda 7, no. 1 (March 2002).
45. Harries, Owen. ‘‘The Collapse of the ‘The West.’’’ Foreign Affairs 72 (September/ October 1993): 41–53.
46. Havel, Vaclav. ‘‘A Call for Sacrifice: The Co-Responsibility of the West.’’ Foreign Affairs 73, no. 2 (March/April 1994): 2–7.
47. Havel, Vaclav. ‘‘A New European Order?’’ The New York Review of Books, March 2, 1995.
48. Holbrooke, Richard. To End a War. New York: Random House, 1998.
49. Hunter, Robert. ‘‘Enlargement: Part of a Strategy for Projecting Stability into Central Europe.’’ NATO Review (May 1995): 3–8.
50. Hutchings, Robert L. American Diplomacy and the End of the Cold War: An Insider’s Account of U.S. Policy in Europe 1989–1992.Washington, DC: TheWoodrowWilson Center Press, 1997.
51. Kagan, Robert. Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2003.
52. Kagan, Robert. ‘‘Power and Weakness.’’ Policy Review, no. 113 (June 2002).
53. Kaldor, Mary, and Ivan Vejvoda, eds. Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Pinter, 1999.
54. Kaplan, Lawrence S. The Long Entanglement: NATO’s First Fifty Years.Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999.
55. Kagan, Robert. NATO Divided, NATO United: The Evolution of an Alliance. Westport, CT, 2004.
56. Katzenstein, Peter J. The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
57. Kay, Sean. NATO and the Future of European Security. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.
58. Kennedy, Robert. ‘‘Educating Leaders for the 21st Century—A Snapshot of the Marshall Center for Security Studies.’’ NATO Review 46, no. 4 (Winter 1998).
59. Lindberg, Tod. Beyond Paradise and Power: Europe, America and the Future of a Troubled Partnership. New York: Routledge, 2005.
60. Linden, Ronald H. ‘‘Putting on Their Sunday Best: Romania, Hungary, and the Puzzle of Peace.’’ International Studies Quarterly 44, no. 1 (March 2000): 121–46.
61. Lunak, Petr. ‘‘Security for Eastern Europe: the European Option.’’ World Policy Journal 11, no. 3 (Fall 1994): 128–32.
62. Lunn, Simon. ‘‘NATO’s Parliamentary Arm Helps Further the Aims of the Alliance.’’ NATO Review 46, no. 4 (Winter 1998).
63. Luong, Pauline Jones, and Erika Weinthal. ‘‘New Friends, New Foes in Central Asia.’’ Foreign Affairs 81, no. 2 (March/April 2002): 61–70.
64. Mandelbaum, Michael. ‘‘A Perfect Failure.’’ Foreign Affairs 78, no. 5 (September/ October 1999): 2–8.
65. Mandelbaum, Michael. ‘‘Preserving the New Peace: The Cast Against NATO Expansion.’’ Foreign Affairs 74, no. 3 (May/June 1995): 9–13.
66. McCalla, Robert. ‘‘NATO’s Persistence.’’ International Organization 50, no. 3 (Summer 1995): 445–75.
67. Mearsheimer, John. ‘‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the ColdWar.’’ International Security 15, no. 1 (Fall 1990): 5–56.
68. Meeting the Challenges of Post–Cold War World: NATO Enlargement and U.S.–Russia Relations. A Report to the Committee on Foreign Relations, submitted by Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in The Debate on NATO Enlargement, hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, 105th Congress, 1st session, October/November 1997.
69. Michta, Andrew A., ed. America’s New Allies: Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic in NATO. Seattle, WA and London: University of Washington Press, 1999.
70. Moisi, Dominque. ‘‘Reinventing the West.’’ Foreign Affairs 82, no. 6 (November/ December, 2003): 67–73.
71. Moroney, Jennifer D.P. Enlarging NATO’s MAP: An Expanded Membership Action Plan Can Guide Aspirants’ Contributions to the War on Terrorism. DFI International Government Services, Current Defense Analyses, no. 5 (August 2002).
72. Newman, Edward. ‘‘Human Security and Constructivism.’’ International Studies Perspectives 2, no. 3 (August 2001): 239–51.
73. Owen, John. ‘‘How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace.’’ International Security 19, no. 2 (Fall 1994): 87–125.
74. Pond, Elizabeth. The Rebirth of Europe. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999.
75. Powell, Colin L. ‘‘A Strategy of Partnerships.’’ Foreign Affairs 83, no. 1 (January/ February, 2004): 22–34.
76. Ralston, Joseph W. ‘‘Successfully Managing NATO Enlargement,’’ in U.S. Department of State, U.S. Foreign Policy Agenda 7, no. 1 (March 2002).
77. Reiter, Dan. ‘‘Why NATO Enlargement Does Not Spread Democracy.’’ International Security 25, no. 4 (2001): 41–67.
78. Risse-Kappen, Thomas. Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
79. Robertson, Lord. ‘‘NATO in the New Millennium.’’ NATO Review 47, no. 4 (Winter 1999).
80. Rose, Charlie. ‘‘Democratic Control of the Armed Forces: A Parliamentary Role in Partnership for Peace.’’ NATO Review 42, no. 5 ( October 1995): 15–19.
81. Ruggie, John Gerard. Winning the Peace: America and the World Order in the New Era. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
82. Ru¨ he, Volker. ‘‘Shaping Euro-Atlantic Policies: A Grand Strategy for a New Era.’’ Survival 35, no. 2 (Summer 1993): 129–37.
83. Rupp, Richard E. NATO After 9/11: An Alliance in Continuing Decline. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
84. Shea, Jamie. NATO 2000: A Political Agenda for a Political Alliance. Brassey’s Atlantic Commentaries. London: Brassey’s, 1990.
85. Simon, Jeffrey. NATO Enlargement and Central Europe: A Study in Civil-Military Relations. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, 1996.
86. Simon, Jeffrey. ‘‘NATO’s Partnership for Peace: Charting a Course for a New Era,’’ RFE/ RL East European Perspectives 6, no. 16 (August 7, 2004).
87. Sloan, Stanley R. NATO, The European Union, and the Atlantic Community: The Transatlantic Bargain Reconsidered. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.
88. Solana, Javier. ‘‘A Defining Moment for NATO: The Washington Summit Decisions and the Kosovo Crisis.’’ NATO Review 47, no. 2 (Summer 1999).
89. Solana, Javier. ‘‘NATO in the 21st Century: An Agenda for the Washington Summit.’’ Congressional Digest (April 1999).
90. Steinberg, James B. ‘‘An Elective Partnership: Salvaging Transatlantic Relations.’’ Survival 45, no. 2 (2003): 113–46.
91. Szayna, Thomas S. ‘‘The Czech Republic.’’ In America’s New Allies: Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic in NATO, edited by Andrew A. Michta. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1999.
92. Szayna, Thomas S NATO Enlargement 2000–2015: Determinants and Implications for Defense Planning and Shaping. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2001.
93. Talbott, Strobe. ‘‘From Prague to Baghdad: NATO at Risk.’’ Foreign Affairs 81, no. 6 (November/December 2002): 46–57.
94. Thomas, Ian. The Promise of Alliance: NATO and the Political Imagination. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, Publishers, Inc. 1997.
95. U.S. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. Report on Human Rights and the Process of NATO Enlargement. Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1997.
96. U.S. Mission to NATO, Report to Congress on Enlargement of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization: Rationale, Benefits, Costs and Implications—Executive Summary, February 24, 1997.
97. Wallander, Celeste. ‘‘Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War.’’ International Organization 54, no. 4 (2000): 705–35.
98. Weaver, Robert. ‘‘Continuing to Build Security Through Partnership.’’ NATO Review, no. 1 (Spring 2004).
99. Yost, David S. NATO Transformed, The Alliance’s New Roles in International Security. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1998.