A bias-free measure of retinotopic tilt adaptation

Journal of Vision

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Morgan, M J ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Methods; Signal detection theory; Visual adaptation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMETRY; RETINA; SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY; STATISTICAL BIAS; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

METHODS; SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RETINA; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 85178548797     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/4.1.7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Blackwell, H. R. (1952). Studies of psychophysical methods for measuring visual thresholds. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 42, 606-616.
2. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
3. De Valois, R. L., & De Valois, K. K. (1991). Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Research, 31(9), 1619-1626.
4. Garcia-Perez, M., & Alcala-Quintana, R. (2012). Shifts of the psychometric function: Distinguishing bias from perceptual effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, iFirst, 1-19.
5. Gheorghiu, E., Kingdom, F. A., Bell, J., & Gurnsey, R. (2011). Why do shape aftereffects increase with eccentricity? Journal of Vision, 11(14):18, 1-21, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/14/18, doi:10.1167/11.14.18. [PubMed] [Article]
6. Harris, J. M., & Morgan, M. J. (1993). Stereo and motion disparities interfere with positional averaging. Vision Research, 33(3), 309-312.
7. Harris, L. R., Morgan, M. J., & Still, A. W. (1981). Moving and the motion after-effect. Nature, 293(5828), 139-141.
8. Hayes, A. (2000). Apparent position governs contourelement binding by the visual system. Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 267(1450), 1341-1345.
9. Hoel, P. G., Port, S. C., & Stone, C. J. (1971). Introduction to statistical theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Jakel, F., & Wichmann, F. A. (2006). Spatial fouralternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naive observers. Journal of Vision, 6(11):13, 1307-1322, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/6/11/13, doi:10.1167/6. 11.13. [PubMed] [Article]
11. Knapen, T., Rolfs, M., & Cavanagh, P. (2009). The reference frame of the motion aftereffect is retinotopic. Journal of Vision, 9(5):16, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/5/16, doi:10. 1167/9.5.16. [PubMed] [Article]
12. Macmillan, N., & Creelman, C. (2009). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York, London: Psychology Press.
13. McGraw, P. V., Whitaker, D., Skillen, J., & Chung, S. T. (2002). Motion adaptation distorts perceived visual position. Current Biology, 12(23), 2042-2047.
14. Morgan, M., Dillenburger, B., Raphael, S., & Solomon, J. A. (2012). Observers can voluntarily shift their psychometric functions without losing sensitivity. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(1), 185-193.
15. Morgan, M. J. (1990). Hyperacuity. In D. Regan (Ed.), Spatial vision (pp. 87-113). London: Macmillan.
16. Morgan, M. J. (2012). Motion adaptation does not depend on attention to the adaptor. Vision Research, 55, 47-51.
17. Morgan, M. J. (2013). Sustained attention is not necessary for velocity adaptation. Journal of Vision, 13(8):26, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/13/8/26, doi:10.1167/13.8.26. [PubMed] [Article]
18. Morgan, M. J. (2011). Wohlgemuth was right: Distracting attention from the adapting stimulus does not decrease the motion after-effect. Vision Research, 51(20), 2169-2175.
19. Ramachandran, V. S., & Anstis, S. M. (1990). Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edges. Perception, 19(5), 611-616.
20. Raphael, S., Dillenburger, B., & Morgan, M. (2013). Computation of relative numerosity of circular dot textures. Journal of Vision, 13(2):17, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/13/2/17, doi:10. 1167/13.2.17. [PubMed] [Article]
21. Solomon, J. A., Lavie, N., & Morgan, M. J. (1997). The contrast discrimination function: Spatial cuing effects. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 38(4), 2953.
22. Taya, S., Adams, W., Graf, E., & Lavie, N. (2009). The fate of task-irrelevant visual motion: Perceptual load versus feature-based attention. Journal of Vision, 9(12):12, 1-10, http://www.journalofvision. org/content/9/12/12, doi:10.1167/9.12.12. [PubMed] [Article]
23. Turi, M., & Burr, D. (2012). Spatiotopic perceptual maps in humans: Evidence from motion adaptation. Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1740), 3091-3097.
24. Watt, R. J., & Andrews, D. P. (1981). APE: Adaptive probit estimation of a psychometric function. Current Psychological Reviews, 1, 205-214.
25. Westheimer, G. (1981). Visual hyperacuity. Progress in Sensory Physiology, 1, 2-29.
26. Winawer, J., Huk, A. C., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). A motion aftereffect from visual imagery of motion. Cognition, 114, 276-284.
27. Zimmermann, E., Morrone, M. C., Fink, G. R., & Burr, D. (2013). Spatiotopic neural representations develop slowly across saccades. Current Biology:CB, 23(5), R193-R194.